Cargando…
The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management
The concept of ecotypes is complex, partly because of its interdisciplinary nature, but the idea is intrinsically valuable for evolutionary biology and applied conservation. The complex nature of ecotypes has spurred some confusion and inconsistencies in the literature, thereby limiting broader theo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13339 |
_version_ | 1784656109270728704 |
---|---|
author | Stronen, Astrid V. Norman, Anita J. Vander Wal, Eric Paquet, Paul C. |
author_facet | Stronen, Astrid V. Norman, Anita J. Vander Wal, Eric Paquet, Paul C. |
author_sort | Stronen, Astrid V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The concept of ecotypes is complex, partly because of its interdisciplinary nature, but the idea is intrinsically valuable for evolutionary biology and applied conservation. The complex nature of ecotypes has spurred some confusion and inconsistencies in the literature, thereby limiting broader theoretical development and practical application. We provide suggestions for how incorporating genetic analyses can ease confusion and help define ecotypes. We approach this by systematically reviewing 112 publications across taxa that simultaneously mention the terms ecotype, conservation and management, to examine the current use of the term in the context of conservation and management. We found that most ecotype studies involve fish, mammals and plants with a focus on habitat use, which at 60% was the most common criterion used for categorization of ecotypes. Only 53% of the studies incorporated genetic analyses, and major discrepancies in available genomic resources among taxa could have contributed to confusion about the role of genetic structure in delineating ecotypes. Our results show that the rapid advances in genetic methods, also for nonmodel organisms, can help clarify the spatiotemporal distribution of adaptive and neutral genetic variation and their relevance to ecotype designations. Genetic analyses can offer empirical support for the ecotype concept and provide a timely measure of evolutionary potential, especially in changing environmental conditions. Genetic variation that is often difficult to detect, including polygenic traits influenced by small contributions from several genes, can be vital for adaptation to rapidly changing environments. Emerging ecotypes may signal speciation in progress, and findings from genome‐enabled organisms can help clarify important selective factors driving ecotype development and persistence, and thereby improve preservation of interspecific genetic diversity. Incorporation of genetic analyses in ecotype studies will help connect evolutionary biology and applied conservation, including that of problematic groups such as natural hybrid organisms and urban or anthropogenic ecotypes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8867706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88677062022-02-28 The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management Stronen, Astrid V. Norman, Anita J. Vander Wal, Eric Paquet, Paul C. Evol Appl Perspective The concept of ecotypes is complex, partly because of its interdisciplinary nature, but the idea is intrinsically valuable for evolutionary biology and applied conservation. The complex nature of ecotypes has spurred some confusion and inconsistencies in the literature, thereby limiting broader theoretical development and practical application. We provide suggestions for how incorporating genetic analyses can ease confusion and help define ecotypes. We approach this by systematically reviewing 112 publications across taxa that simultaneously mention the terms ecotype, conservation and management, to examine the current use of the term in the context of conservation and management. We found that most ecotype studies involve fish, mammals and plants with a focus on habitat use, which at 60% was the most common criterion used for categorization of ecotypes. Only 53% of the studies incorporated genetic analyses, and major discrepancies in available genomic resources among taxa could have contributed to confusion about the role of genetic structure in delineating ecotypes. Our results show that the rapid advances in genetic methods, also for nonmodel organisms, can help clarify the spatiotemporal distribution of adaptive and neutral genetic variation and their relevance to ecotype designations. Genetic analyses can offer empirical support for the ecotype concept and provide a timely measure of evolutionary potential, especially in changing environmental conditions. Genetic variation that is often difficult to detect, including polygenic traits influenced by small contributions from several genes, can be vital for adaptation to rapidly changing environments. Emerging ecotypes may signal speciation in progress, and findings from genome‐enabled organisms can help clarify important selective factors driving ecotype development and persistence, and thereby improve preservation of interspecific genetic diversity. Incorporation of genetic analyses in ecotype studies will help connect evolutionary biology and applied conservation, including that of problematic groups such as natural hybrid organisms and urban or anthropogenic ecotypes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8867706/ /pubmed/35233242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13339 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Stronen, Astrid V. Norman, Anita J. Vander Wal, Eric Paquet, Paul C. The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management |
title | The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management |
title_full | The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management |
title_fullStr | The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management |
title_full_unstemmed | The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management |
title_short | The relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management |
title_sort | relevance of genetic structure in ecotype designation and conservation management |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stronenastridv therelevanceofgeneticstructureinecotypedesignationandconservationmanagement AT normananitaj therelevanceofgeneticstructureinecotypedesignationandconservationmanagement AT vanderwaleric therelevanceofgeneticstructureinecotypedesignationandconservationmanagement AT paquetpaulc therelevanceofgeneticstructureinecotypedesignationandconservationmanagement AT stronenastridv relevanceofgeneticstructureinecotypedesignationandconservationmanagement AT normananitaj relevanceofgeneticstructureinecotypedesignationandconservationmanagement AT vanderwaleric relevanceofgeneticstructureinecotypedesignationandconservationmanagement AT paquetpaulc relevanceofgeneticstructureinecotypedesignationandconservationmanagement |