Cargando…

Negative Piezoelectric Coefficient in Ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) Monolayer

[Image: see text] The discovery of two-dimensional (2D) magnetic materials that have excellent piezoelectric response is promising for nanoscale multifunctional piezoelectric or spintronic devices. Piezoelectricity requires a noncentrosymmetric structure with an electronic band gap, whereas magnetis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noor-A-Alam, Mohammad, Nolan, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c01214
_version_ 1784656113056088064
author Noor-A-Alam, Mohammad
Nolan, Michael
author_facet Noor-A-Alam, Mohammad
Nolan, Michael
author_sort Noor-A-Alam, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The discovery of two-dimensional (2D) magnetic materials that have excellent piezoelectric response is promising for nanoscale multifunctional piezoelectric or spintronic devices. Piezoelectricity requires a noncentrosymmetric structure with an electronic band gap, whereas magnetism demands broken time-reversal symmetry. Most of the well-known 2D piezoelectrics, e.g., 1H-MoS(2) monolayer, are not magnetic. Being intrinsically magnetic, semiconducting 1H-LaBr(2) and 1H-VS(2) monolayers can combine magnetism and piezoelectricity. We compare piezoelectric properties of 1H-MoS(2), 1H-VS(2), and 1H-LaBr(2) using density functional theory. The ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) and 1H-VS(2) monolayers display larger piezoelectric strain coefficients, namely, d(11) = −4.527 pm/V for 1H-LaBr(2) and d(11) = 4.104 pm/V for 1H-VS(2), compared to 1H-MoS(2) (d(11) = 3.706 pm/V). 1H-MoS(2) has a larger piezoelectric stress coefficient (e(11) = 370.675 pC/m) than 1H-LaBr(2) (e(11) = −94.175 pC/m) and 1H-VS(2) (e(11) = 298.100 pC/m). The large d(11) for 1H-LaBr(2) originates from the low elastic constants, C(11) = 30.338 N/m and C(12) = 9.534 N/m. The sign of the piezoelectric coefficients for 1H-LaBr(2) is negative, and this arises from the negative ionic contribution of e(11), which dominates in 1H-LaBr(2), whereas the electronic part of e(11) dominates in 1H-MoS(2) and 1H-VS(2). We explain the origin of this large ionic contribution of e(11) for 1H-LaBr(2) through Born effective charges (Z(11)) and the sensitivity of the atomic positions to the strain (du/dη). We observe a sign reversal in the Z(11) values of Mo and S compared to the nominal oxidation states, which makes both the electronic and ionic parts of e(11) positive and results in the high value of e(11). We also show that a change in magnetic order can enhance (reduce) the piezoresponse of 1H-LaBr(2) (1H-VS(2)).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8867721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88677212022-02-24 Negative Piezoelectric Coefficient in Ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) Monolayer Noor-A-Alam, Mohammad Nolan, Michael ACS Appl Electron Mater [Image: see text] The discovery of two-dimensional (2D) magnetic materials that have excellent piezoelectric response is promising for nanoscale multifunctional piezoelectric or spintronic devices. Piezoelectricity requires a noncentrosymmetric structure with an electronic band gap, whereas magnetism demands broken time-reversal symmetry. Most of the well-known 2D piezoelectrics, e.g., 1H-MoS(2) monolayer, are not magnetic. Being intrinsically magnetic, semiconducting 1H-LaBr(2) and 1H-VS(2) monolayers can combine magnetism and piezoelectricity. We compare piezoelectric properties of 1H-MoS(2), 1H-VS(2), and 1H-LaBr(2) using density functional theory. The ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) and 1H-VS(2) monolayers display larger piezoelectric strain coefficients, namely, d(11) = −4.527 pm/V for 1H-LaBr(2) and d(11) = 4.104 pm/V for 1H-VS(2), compared to 1H-MoS(2) (d(11) = 3.706 pm/V). 1H-MoS(2) has a larger piezoelectric stress coefficient (e(11) = 370.675 pC/m) than 1H-LaBr(2) (e(11) = −94.175 pC/m) and 1H-VS(2) (e(11) = 298.100 pC/m). The large d(11) for 1H-LaBr(2) originates from the low elastic constants, C(11) = 30.338 N/m and C(12) = 9.534 N/m. The sign of the piezoelectric coefficients for 1H-LaBr(2) is negative, and this arises from the negative ionic contribution of e(11), which dominates in 1H-LaBr(2), whereas the electronic part of e(11) dominates in 1H-MoS(2) and 1H-VS(2). We explain the origin of this large ionic contribution of e(11) for 1H-LaBr(2) through Born effective charges (Z(11)) and the sensitivity of the atomic positions to the strain (du/dη). We observe a sign reversal in the Z(11) values of Mo and S compared to the nominal oxidation states, which makes both the electronic and ionic parts of e(11) positive and results in the high value of e(11). We also show that a change in magnetic order can enhance (reduce) the piezoresponse of 1H-LaBr(2) (1H-VS(2)). American Chemical Society 2022-01-15 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8867721/ /pubmed/35224502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c01214 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Noor-A-Alam, Mohammad
Nolan, Michael
Negative Piezoelectric Coefficient in Ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) Monolayer
title Negative Piezoelectric Coefficient in Ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) Monolayer
title_full Negative Piezoelectric Coefficient in Ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) Monolayer
title_fullStr Negative Piezoelectric Coefficient in Ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) Monolayer
title_full_unstemmed Negative Piezoelectric Coefficient in Ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) Monolayer
title_short Negative Piezoelectric Coefficient in Ferromagnetic 1H-LaBr(2) Monolayer
title_sort negative piezoelectric coefficient in ferromagnetic 1h-labr(2) monolayer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35224502
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c01214
work_keys_str_mv AT nooraalammohammad negativepiezoelectriccoefficientinferromagnetic1hlabr2monolayer
AT nolanmichael negativepiezoelectriccoefficientinferromagnetic1hlabr2monolayer