Cargando…

Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Though unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a useful procedure to treat knee osteoarthritis, it remains a great controversial point as to if navigated systems are able to achieve better accuracy of limb alignment and greater clinic results. Current meta-analysis was conducted to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Keteng, Chen, Qun, Yan, Qing, Wang, Qin, Sun, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03013-8
_version_ 1784656120737955840
author Xu, Keteng
Chen, Qun
Yan, Qing
Wang, Qin
Sun, Jun
author_facet Xu, Keteng
Chen, Qun
Yan, Qing
Wang, Qin
Sun, Jun
author_sort Xu, Keteng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Though unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a useful procedure to treat knee osteoarthritis, it remains a great controversial point as to if navigated systems are able to achieve better accuracy of limb alignment and greater clinic results. Current meta-analysis was conducted to explore if better clinical outcomes and radiographic outcomes could be acquired in the navigated system when compared with conventional procedures. METHODS: We identified studies in the online databases, including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science before May 2021. The PRISMA guidelines in this report were strictly followed. Our research was completed via Review Manager 5.4 software. RESULTS: Fourteen articles were included, involving 852 knees. The present meta-analysis displayed that the navigated system had remarkably improved outcomes in inliers of mechanical axis (MA) (P < 0.01), MA in the Kennedy's central zone (Zone C) (P = 0.04), inliers of the coronal femoral component (P < 0.01), inliers of the coronal tibial component (P = 0.005), inliers of the sagittal femoral component (P = 0.03), inliers of the sagittal tibial component (P = 0.002) and Range Of Motion (ROM) (P = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (P = 0.15), American Knee Society Knee Score (KSS score) (P = 0.61) and postoperative complications (P = 0.73) between these 2 groups. Regarding operating time, the navigated group was 10.63 min longer in contrast to the traditional group. CONCLUSION: Based on our research, the navigated system provided better radiographic outcomes and no significant difference in the risk of complications with longer surgical time than the conventional techniques. But no significant differences were found in functional outcomes. Because the included studies were small samples and short-term follow-up, high-quality RCTs with large patients and sufficient follow-up are required to identify the long-term effect of the navigated system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8867766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88677662022-02-25 Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis Xu, Keteng Chen, Qun Yan, Qing Wang, Qin Sun, Jun J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Though unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a useful procedure to treat knee osteoarthritis, it remains a great controversial point as to if navigated systems are able to achieve better accuracy of limb alignment and greater clinic results. Current meta-analysis was conducted to explore if better clinical outcomes and radiographic outcomes could be acquired in the navigated system when compared with conventional procedures. METHODS: We identified studies in the online databases, including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science before May 2021. The PRISMA guidelines in this report were strictly followed. Our research was completed via Review Manager 5.4 software. RESULTS: Fourteen articles were included, involving 852 knees. The present meta-analysis displayed that the navigated system had remarkably improved outcomes in inliers of mechanical axis (MA) (P < 0.01), MA in the Kennedy's central zone (Zone C) (P = 0.04), inliers of the coronal femoral component (P < 0.01), inliers of the coronal tibial component (P = 0.005), inliers of the sagittal femoral component (P = 0.03), inliers of the sagittal tibial component (P = 0.002) and Range Of Motion (ROM) (P = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (P = 0.15), American Knee Society Knee Score (KSS score) (P = 0.61) and postoperative complications (P = 0.73) between these 2 groups. Regarding operating time, the navigated group was 10.63 min longer in contrast to the traditional group. CONCLUSION: Based on our research, the navigated system provided better radiographic outcomes and no significant difference in the risk of complications with longer surgical time than the conventional techniques. But no significant differences were found in functional outcomes. Because the included studies were small samples and short-term follow-up, high-quality RCTs with large patients and sufficient follow-up are required to identify the long-term effect of the navigated system. BioMed Central 2022-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8867766/ /pubmed/35209906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03013-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xu, Keteng
Chen, Qun
Yan, Qing
Wang, Qin
Sun, Jun
Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35209906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03013-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xuketeng comparisonofcomputerassistednavigatedtechnologyandconventionaltechnologyinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyametaanalysis
AT chenqun comparisonofcomputerassistednavigatedtechnologyandconventionaltechnologyinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyametaanalysis
AT yanqing comparisonofcomputerassistednavigatedtechnologyandconventionaltechnologyinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyametaanalysis
AT wangqin comparisonofcomputerassistednavigatedtechnologyandconventionaltechnologyinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyametaanalysis
AT sunjun comparisonofcomputerassistednavigatedtechnologyandconventionaltechnologyinunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyametaanalysis