Cargando…

α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception

Spontaneous α oscillations (∼10 Hz) have been associated with various cognitive functions, including perception. Their phase and amplitude independently predict cortical excitability and subsequent perceptual performance. However, the causal role of α phase-amplitude tradeoffs on visual perception r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fakche, Camille, VanRullen, Rufin, Marque, Philippe, Dugué, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8868024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0244-21.2022
_version_ 1784656165482790912
author Fakche, Camille
VanRullen, Rufin
Marque, Philippe
Dugué, Laura
author_facet Fakche, Camille
VanRullen, Rufin
Marque, Philippe
Dugué, Laura
author_sort Fakche, Camille
collection PubMed
description Spontaneous α oscillations (∼10 Hz) have been associated with various cognitive functions, including perception. Their phase and amplitude independently predict cortical excitability and subsequent perceptual performance. However, the causal role of α phase-amplitude tradeoffs on visual perception remains ill-defined. We aimed to fill this gap and tested two clear predictions from the pulsed inhibition theory according to which α oscillations are associated with periodic functional inhibition. (1) High-α amplitude induces cortical inhibition at specific phases, associated with low perceptual performance, while at opposite phases, inhibition decreases (potentially increasing excitation) and perceptual performance increases. (2) Low-α amplitude is less susceptible to these phasic (periodic) pulses of inhibition, leading to overall higher perceptual performance. Here, cortical excitability was assessed in humans using phosphene (illusory) perception induced by single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over visual cortex at perceptual threshold, and its postpulse evoked activity recorded with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG). We observed that prepulse α phase modulates the probability to perceive a phosphene, predominantly for high-α amplitude, with a nonoptimal phase for phosphene perception between –π/2 and –π/4. The prepulse nonoptimal phase further leads to an increase in postpulse-evoked activity [event-related potential (ERP)], in phosphene-perceived trials specifically. Together, these results show that α oscillations create periodic inhibitory moments when α amplitude is high, leading to periodic decrease of perceptual performance. This study provides strong causal evidence in favor of the pulsed inhibition theory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8868024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88680242022-02-25 α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception Fakche, Camille VanRullen, Rufin Marque, Philippe Dugué, Laura eNeuro Research Article: New Research Spontaneous α oscillations (∼10 Hz) have been associated with various cognitive functions, including perception. Their phase and amplitude independently predict cortical excitability and subsequent perceptual performance. However, the causal role of α phase-amplitude tradeoffs on visual perception remains ill-defined. We aimed to fill this gap and tested two clear predictions from the pulsed inhibition theory according to which α oscillations are associated with periodic functional inhibition. (1) High-α amplitude induces cortical inhibition at specific phases, associated with low perceptual performance, while at opposite phases, inhibition decreases (potentially increasing excitation) and perceptual performance increases. (2) Low-α amplitude is less susceptible to these phasic (periodic) pulses of inhibition, leading to overall higher perceptual performance. Here, cortical excitability was assessed in humans using phosphene (illusory) perception induced by single pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over visual cortex at perceptual threshold, and its postpulse evoked activity recorded with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG). We observed that prepulse α phase modulates the probability to perceive a phosphene, predominantly for high-α amplitude, with a nonoptimal phase for phosphene perception between –π/2 and –π/4. The prepulse nonoptimal phase further leads to an increase in postpulse-evoked activity [event-related potential (ERP)], in phosphene-perceived trials specifically. Together, these results show that α oscillations create periodic inhibitory moments when α amplitude is high, leading to periodic decrease of perceptual performance. This study provides strong causal evidence in favor of the pulsed inhibition theory. Society for Neuroscience 2022-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8868024/ /pubmed/35105658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0244-21.2022 Text en Copyright © 2022 Fakche et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article: New Research
Fakche, Camille
VanRullen, Rufin
Marque, Philippe
Dugué, Laura
α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
title α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
title_full α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
title_fullStr α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
title_full_unstemmed α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
title_short α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception
title_sort α phase-amplitude tradeoffs predict visual perception
topic Research Article: New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8868024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0244-21.2022
work_keys_str_mv AT fakchecamille aphaseamplitudetradeoffspredictvisualperception
AT vanrullenrufin aphaseamplitudetradeoffspredictvisualperception
AT marquephilippe aphaseamplitudetradeoffspredictvisualperception
AT duguelaura aphaseamplitudetradeoffspredictvisualperception