Cargando…

The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare

SIMPLE SUMMARY: For at least the last four decades, the focus of animal welfare research, quality assurance, and policy initiatives has been on measuring behavioural and physiological stress responses in animals. In the last decade, however, this focus of animal welfare research has shifted to the c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acharya, Rutu Y., Hemsworth, Paul H., Coleman, Grahame J., Kinder, James E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8868546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12040487
_version_ 1784656293309448192
author Acharya, Rutu Y.
Hemsworth, Paul H.
Coleman, Grahame J.
Kinder, James E.
author_facet Acharya, Rutu Y.
Hemsworth, Paul H.
Coleman, Grahame J.
Kinder, James E.
author_sort Acharya, Rutu Y.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: For at least the last four decades, the focus of animal welfare research, quality assurance, and policy initiatives has been on measuring behavioural and physiological stress responses in animals. In the last decade, however, this focus of animal welfare research has shifted to the consequences of these behavioural and physiological stress responses rather than only the responses per se. Modern-day farming, even with the intensification and automation requires regular monitoring and interactions by stockpeople. Research conducted in both experimental and commercial settings has shown widespread effects of the human-animal interactions on behaviour, physiology, and reproductive performance in farm animals. In this paper, we review the implications of human-animal interactions on reproduction in farm animals. ABSTRACT: A negative human-animal relationship (HAR) from the perspective of the animal is a limiting factor affecting farm animal welfare, as well as farm animal productivity. Research in farm animals has elucidated sequential relationships between stockperson attitudes, stockperson behaviour, farm animal fear behaviour, farm animal stress physiology, and farm animal productivity. In situations where stockperson attitudes to and interactions with farm animals are sub-optimal, through animal fear and stress, both animal welfare and productivity, including reproductive performance, can be compromised. There is a growing body of evidence that farm animals often seek and enjoy interacting with humans, but our understanding of the effects of a positive HAR on stress resilience and productivity in farm animals is limited. In this review, we explore the pathways by which stress induced by human-animal interactions can negatively affect farm animal reproduction, in particular, via inhibitory effects on the secretion of gonadotrophins. We also review the current knowledge of the stockperson characteristics and the nature of stockperson interactions that affect fear and physiological stress in farm animals. The contents of this review provide an insight into the importance of the HAR on farm animal welfare and reproduction while highlighting the gap in knowledge regarding the effects of a positive HAR on farm animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8868546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88685462022-02-25 The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare Acharya, Rutu Y. Hemsworth, Paul H. Coleman, Grahame J. Kinder, James E. Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: For at least the last four decades, the focus of animal welfare research, quality assurance, and policy initiatives has been on measuring behavioural and physiological stress responses in animals. In the last decade, however, this focus of animal welfare research has shifted to the consequences of these behavioural and physiological stress responses rather than only the responses per se. Modern-day farming, even with the intensification and automation requires regular monitoring and interactions by stockpeople. Research conducted in both experimental and commercial settings has shown widespread effects of the human-animal interactions on behaviour, physiology, and reproductive performance in farm animals. In this paper, we review the implications of human-animal interactions on reproduction in farm animals. ABSTRACT: A negative human-animal relationship (HAR) from the perspective of the animal is a limiting factor affecting farm animal welfare, as well as farm animal productivity. Research in farm animals has elucidated sequential relationships between stockperson attitudes, stockperson behaviour, farm animal fear behaviour, farm animal stress physiology, and farm animal productivity. In situations where stockperson attitudes to and interactions with farm animals are sub-optimal, through animal fear and stress, both animal welfare and productivity, including reproductive performance, can be compromised. There is a growing body of evidence that farm animals often seek and enjoy interacting with humans, but our understanding of the effects of a positive HAR on stress resilience and productivity in farm animals is limited. In this review, we explore the pathways by which stress induced by human-animal interactions can negatively affect farm animal reproduction, in particular, via inhibitory effects on the secretion of gonadotrophins. We also review the current knowledge of the stockperson characteristics and the nature of stockperson interactions that affect fear and physiological stress in farm animals. The contents of this review provide an insight into the importance of the HAR on farm animal welfare and reproduction while highlighting the gap in knowledge regarding the effects of a positive HAR on farm animals. MDPI 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8868546/ /pubmed/35203194 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12040487 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Acharya, Rutu Y.
Hemsworth, Paul H.
Coleman, Grahame J.
Kinder, James E.
The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare
title The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare
title_full The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare
title_fullStr The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare
title_full_unstemmed The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare
title_short The Animal-Human Interface in Farm Animal Production: Animal Fear, Stress, Reproduction and Welfare
title_sort animal-human interface in farm animal production: animal fear, stress, reproduction and welfare
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8868546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203194
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12040487
work_keys_str_mv AT acharyarutuy theanimalhumaninterfaceinfarmanimalproductionanimalfearstressreproductionandwelfare
AT hemsworthpaulh theanimalhumaninterfaceinfarmanimalproductionanimalfearstressreproductionandwelfare
AT colemangrahamej theanimalhumaninterfaceinfarmanimalproductionanimalfearstressreproductionandwelfare
AT kinderjamese theanimalhumaninterfaceinfarmanimalproductionanimalfearstressreproductionandwelfare
AT acharyarutuy animalhumaninterfaceinfarmanimalproductionanimalfearstressreproductionandwelfare
AT hemsworthpaulh animalhumaninterfaceinfarmanimalproductionanimalfearstressreproductionandwelfare
AT colemangrahamej animalhumaninterfaceinfarmanimalproductionanimalfearstressreproductionandwelfare
AT kinderjamese animalhumaninterfaceinfarmanimalproductionanimalfearstressreproductionandwelfare