Cargando…

Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas

As academic and political interest in citizen participation and democratic innovations is growing, the question of their impact on public policy remains essential to assess their genuine contribution to the normative project of democratization. Impact assessments of consultative participatory mechan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vrydagh, Julien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8869347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09450-w
_version_ 1784656476289105920
author Vrydagh, Julien
author_facet Vrydagh, Julien
author_sort Vrydagh, Julien
collection PubMed
description As academic and political interest in citizen participation and democratic innovations is growing, the question of their impact on public policy remains essential to assess their genuine contribution to the normative project of democratization. Impact assessments of consultative participatory mechanisms are commonly conducted with a congruency approach—a desk-based research method which assesses impact based on the textual correspondence between a citizen-created idea and public policy documents. This method, however, lacks reliability and uniformity, and this paper therefore seeks to standardize its application and ways to improve the accuracy of its results by proposing two methodological add-ons. First, a sequential impact matrix that considers the preferences of decision-makers before a consultative participatory mechanism to see the extent to which decision-makers take up citizen ideas that align with or diverge from their own agenda. Second, a mixed method that combines a congruency approach with interviews of actors involved in the follow-up of the participatory process to balance their experiences with the congruency approach’s main findings. The variants of the congruency approach are then applied to a deliberative minipublic—the citizen panel ‘Brussels—Make Your Mobility’. This analysis shows how these methodological strategies alter the impact assessment’s results, and its findings suggest that the use of a sequential impact matrix with a mixed method not only produces an accurate and reliable measurement but also generates valuable insights into the diffuse ways in which minipublics can exert substantial influences on the institutional structures and the political decision-making. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11077-022-09450-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8869347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88693472022-02-25 Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas Vrydagh, Julien Policy Sci Research Article As academic and political interest in citizen participation and democratic innovations is growing, the question of their impact on public policy remains essential to assess their genuine contribution to the normative project of democratization. Impact assessments of consultative participatory mechanisms are commonly conducted with a congruency approach—a desk-based research method which assesses impact based on the textual correspondence between a citizen-created idea and public policy documents. This method, however, lacks reliability and uniformity, and this paper therefore seeks to standardize its application and ways to improve the accuracy of its results by proposing two methodological add-ons. First, a sequential impact matrix that considers the preferences of decision-makers before a consultative participatory mechanism to see the extent to which decision-makers take up citizen ideas that align with or diverge from their own agenda. Second, a mixed method that combines a congruency approach with interviews of actors involved in the follow-up of the participatory process to balance their experiences with the congruency approach’s main findings. The variants of the congruency approach are then applied to a deliberative minipublic—the citizen panel ‘Brussels—Make Your Mobility’. This analysis shows how these methodological strategies alter the impact assessment’s results, and its findings suggest that the use of a sequential impact matrix with a mixed method not only produces an accurate and reliable measurement but also generates valuable insights into the diffuse ways in which minipublics can exert substantial influences on the institutional structures and the political decision-making. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11077-022-09450-w. Springer US 2022-02-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8869347/ /pubmed/35233119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09450-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vrydagh, Julien
Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas
title Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas
title_full Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas
title_fullStr Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas
title_short Measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas
title_sort measuring the impact of consultative citizen participation: reviewing the congruency approaches for assessing the uptake of citizen ideas
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8869347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35233119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09450-w
work_keys_str_mv AT vrydaghjulien measuringtheimpactofconsultativecitizenparticipationreviewingthecongruencyapproachesforassessingtheuptakeofcitizenideas