Cargando…

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can detect lesions hidden in inflammatory regions and find necrosis or areas of severe fibrosis within the lesion. This retrospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of solid pancreatic lesions using percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gui, Yang, Dai, Menghua, Meng, Zhilan, Chang, Xiaoyan, Tan, Li, Zhang, Jing, Chen, Xueqi, Zhou, Tongtong, Zhang, Qing, Xiao, Mengsu, Lyu, Ke, Jiang, Yuxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8869662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001638
_version_ 1784656549747097600
author Gui, Yang
Dai, Menghua
Meng, Zhilan
Chang, Xiaoyan
Tan, Li
Zhang, Jing
Chen, Xueqi
Zhou, Tongtong
Zhang, Qing
Xiao, Mengsu
Lyu, Ke
Jiang, Yuxin
author_facet Gui, Yang
Dai, Menghua
Meng, Zhilan
Chang, Xiaoyan
Tan, Li
Zhang, Jing
Chen, Xueqi
Zhou, Tongtong
Zhang, Qing
Xiao, Mengsu
Lyu, Ke
Jiang, Yuxin
author_sort Gui, Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can detect lesions hidden in inflammatory regions and find necrosis or areas of severe fibrosis within the lesion. This retrospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of solid pancreatic lesions using percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with or without CEUS assessment. METHODS: Clinical, imaging, and pathologic data of 181 patients from January 2014 to December 2018 in Pecking Union Medical College Hospital, with solid pancreatic masses who underwent percutaneous US-FNA and ThinPrep cytologic test were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into CEUS and US groups according to whether CEUS was performed before the biopsy. According to FNA cytology diagnoses, we combined non-diagnostic, neoplastic, and negative cases into a negative category. The positive category included malignant, suspicious, and atypical cases. The final diagnosis was confirmed by pathology or clinical and radiological follow-up for at least 12 months. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of US-FNA were evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: This study enrolled 107 male and 74 female patients (average age: 60 years). There were 58 cases in the US group and 123 cases in the CEUS group. No statistically significant differences in age, gender, or lesion size were found between the two groups. The diagnostic accuracy of the CEUS group was 95.1% (117/123), which was higher than the 86.2% (50/58) observed in the US group (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the CEUS group were increased by 7.5%, 16.7%, 3.4%, and 18.8%, respectively, compared with the US group. However, the differences of the two groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the conventional US, the use of CEUS could improve the biopsy accuracy and avoid the need for a repeat biopsy, especially for some complicated FNA cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8869662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88696622022-02-25 Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions Gui, Yang Dai, Menghua Meng, Zhilan Chang, Xiaoyan Tan, Li Zhang, Jing Chen, Xueqi Zhou, Tongtong Zhang, Qing Xiao, Mengsu Lyu, Ke Jiang, Yuxin Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can detect lesions hidden in inflammatory regions and find necrosis or areas of severe fibrosis within the lesion. This retrospective study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of solid pancreatic lesions using percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with or without CEUS assessment. METHODS: Clinical, imaging, and pathologic data of 181 patients from January 2014 to December 2018 in Pecking Union Medical College Hospital, with solid pancreatic masses who underwent percutaneous US-FNA and ThinPrep cytologic test were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into CEUS and US groups according to whether CEUS was performed before the biopsy. According to FNA cytology diagnoses, we combined non-diagnostic, neoplastic, and negative cases into a negative category. The positive category included malignant, suspicious, and atypical cases. The final diagnosis was confirmed by pathology or clinical and radiological follow-up for at least 12 months. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of US-FNA were evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: This study enrolled 107 male and 74 female patients (average age: 60 years). There were 58 cases in the US group and 123 cases in the CEUS group. No statistically significant differences in age, gender, or lesion size were found between the two groups. The diagnostic accuracy of the CEUS group was 95.1% (117/123), which was higher than the 86.2% (50/58) observed in the US group (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the CEUS group were increased by 7.5%, 16.7%, 3.4%, and 18.8%, respectively, compared with the US group. However, the differences of the two groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the conventional US, the use of CEUS could improve the biopsy accuracy and avoid the need for a repeat biopsy, especially for some complicated FNA cases. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-02-20 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8869662/ /pubmed/34759214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001638 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gui, Yang
Dai, Menghua
Meng, Zhilan
Chang, Xiaoyan
Tan, Li
Zhang, Jing
Chen, Xueqi
Zhou, Tongtong
Zhang, Qing
Xiao, Mengsu
Lyu, Ke
Jiang, Yuxin
Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
title Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
title_full Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
title_fullStr Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
title_full_unstemmed Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
title_short Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
title_sort value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8869662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34759214
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000001638
work_keys_str_mv AT guiyang valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT daimenghua valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT mengzhilan valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT changxiaoyan valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT tanli valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT zhangjing valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT chenxueqi valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT zhoutongtong valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT zhangqing valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT xiaomengsu valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT lyuke valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions
AT jiangyuxin valueofcontrastenhancedultrasoundcombinedwithpercutaneousultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationinthediagnosisofsolidpancreaticlesions