Cargando…

Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and usability of a novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system designed for needle-free insertion and reduced environmental impact. We assessed the sensor performance of two GlucoMen(®) Day CGM systems worn simultaneously by eight participants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hochfellner, Daniel A., Simic, Amra, Taucher, Marlene T., Sailer, Lea S., Kopanz, Julia, Pöttler, Tina, Mader, Julia K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8869704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200366
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12020106
_version_ 1784656560049356800
author Hochfellner, Daniel A.
Simic, Amra
Taucher, Marlene T.
Sailer, Lea S.
Kopanz, Julia
Pöttler, Tina
Mader, Julia K.
author_facet Hochfellner, Daniel A.
Simic, Amra
Taucher, Marlene T.
Sailer, Lea S.
Kopanz, Julia
Pöttler, Tina
Mader, Julia K.
author_sort Hochfellner, Daniel A.
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and usability of a novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system designed for needle-free insertion and reduced environmental impact. We assessed the sensor performance of two GlucoMen(®) Day CGM systems worn simultaneously by eight participants with type 1 diabetes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was performed regularly over 14 days at home. Participants underwent two standardized, 5-h meal challenges at the research center with frequent plasma glucose (PG) measurements using a laboratory reference (YSI) instrument. When comparing CGM to PG, the overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.7 [2.6–14.6]%. The overall MARD for CGM vs. SMBG was 13.1 [3.5–18.6]%. The consensus error grid (CEG) analysis showed 98% of both CGM/PG and CGM/SMBG pairs in the clinically acceptable zones A and B. The analysis confirmed that GlucoMen(®) Day CGM meets the clinical requirements for state-of-the-art CGM. In addition, the needle-free insertion technology is well tolerated by users and reduces medical waste compared to conventional CGM systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8869704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88697042022-02-25 Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study Hochfellner, Daniel A. Simic, Amra Taucher, Marlene T. Sailer, Lea S. Kopanz, Julia Pöttler, Tina Mader, Julia K. Biosensors (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and usability of a novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system designed for needle-free insertion and reduced environmental impact. We assessed the sensor performance of two GlucoMen(®) Day CGM systems worn simultaneously by eight participants with type 1 diabetes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was performed regularly over 14 days at home. Participants underwent two standardized, 5-h meal challenges at the research center with frequent plasma glucose (PG) measurements using a laboratory reference (YSI) instrument. When comparing CGM to PG, the overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.7 [2.6–14.6]%. The overall MARD for CGM vs. SMBG was 13.1 [3.5–18.6]%. The consensus error grid (CEG) analysis showed 98% of both CGM/PG and CGM/SMBG pairs in the clinically acceptable zones A and B. The analysis confirmed that GlucoMen(®) Day CGM meets the clinical requirements for state-of-the-art CGM. In addition, the needle-free insertion technology is well tolerated by users and reduces medical waste compared to conventional CGM systems. MDPI 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8869704/ /pubmed/35200366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12020106 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hochfellner, Daniel A.
Simic, Amra
Taucher, Marlene T.
Sailer, Lea S.
Kopanz, Julia
Pöttler, Tina
Mader, Julia K.
Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
title Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
title_full Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
title_short Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
title_sort accuracy assessment of the glucomen(®) day cgm system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a pilot study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8869704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200366
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12020106
work_keys_str_mv AT hochfellnerdaniela accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy
AT simicamra accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy
AT tauchermarlenet accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy
AT sailerleas accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy
AT kopanzjulia accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy
AT pottlertina accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy
AT maderjuliak accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy