Cargando…
Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and usability of a novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system designed for needle-free insertion and reduced environmental impact. We assessed the sensor performance of two GlucoMen(®) Day CGM systems worn simultaneously by eight participants...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8869704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12020106 |
_version_ | 1784656560049356800 |
---|---|
author | Hochfellner, Daniel A. Simic, Amra Taucher, Marlene T. Sailer, Lea S. Kopanz, Julia Pöttler, Tina Mader, Julia K. |
author_facet | Hochfellner, Daniel A. Simic, Amra Taucher, Marlene T. Sailer, Lea S. Kopanz, Julia Pöttler, Tina Mader, Julia K. |
author_sort | Hochfellner, Daniel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and usability of a novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system designed for needle-free insertion and reduced environmental impact. We assessed the sensor performance of two GlucoMen(®) Day CGM systems worn simultaneously by eight participants with type 1 diabetes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was performed regularly over 14 days at home. Participants underwent two standardized, 5-h meal challenges at the research center with frequent plasma glucose (PG) measurements using a laboratory reference (YSI) instrument. When comparing CGM to PG, the overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.7 [2.6–14.6]%. The overall MARD for CGM vs. SMBG was 13.1 [3.5–18.6]%. The consensus error grid (CEG) analysis showed 98% of both CGM/PG and CGM/SMBG pairs in the clinically acceptable zones A and B. The analysis confirmed that GlucoMen(®) Day CGM meets the clinical requirements for state-of-the-art CGM. In addition, the needle-free insertion technology is well tolerated by users and reduces medical waste compared to conventional CGM systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8869704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88697042022-02-25 Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study Hochfellner, Daniel A. Simic, Amra Taucher, Marlene T. Sailer, Lea S. Kopanz, Julia Pöttler, Tina Mader, Julia K. Biosensors (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and usability of a novel continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system designed for needle-free insertion and reduced environmental impact. We assessed the sensor performance of two GlucoMen(®) Day CGM systems worn simultaneously by eight participants with type 1 diabetes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) was performed regularly over 14 days at home. Participants underwent two standardized, 5-h meal challenges at the research center with frequent plasma glucose (PG) measurements using a laboratory reference (YSI) instrument. When comparing CGM to PG, the overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 9.7 [2.6–14.6]%. The overall MARD for CGM vs. SMBG was 13.1 [3.5–18.6]%. The consensus error grid (CEG) analysis showed 98% of both CGM/PG and CGM/SMBG pairs in the clinically acceptable zones A and B. The analysis confirmed that GlucoMen(®) Day CGM meets the clinical requirements for state-of-the-art CGM. In addition, the needle-free insertion technology is well tolerated by users and reduces medical waste compared to conventional CGM systems. MDPI 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8869704/ /pubmed/35200366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12020106 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hochfellner, Daniel A. Simic, Amra Taucher, Marlene T. Sailer, Lea S. Kopanz, Julia Pöttler, Tina Mader, Julia K. Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study |
title | Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Accuracy Assessment of the GlucoMen(®) Day CGM System in Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | accuracy assessment of the glucomen(®) day cgm system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8869704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200366 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios12020106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hochfellnerdaniela accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy AT simicamra accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy AT tauchermarlenet accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy AT sailerleas accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy AT kopanzjulia accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy AT pottlertina accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy AT maderjuliak accuracyassessmentoftheglucomendaycgmsysteminindividualswithtype1diabetesapilotstudy |