Cargando…
Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study
SIMPLE SUMMARY: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of 1382 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). A total of 684 (49.5%) were operated on by minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 233 (34%) by robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) by conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041081 |
_version_ | 1784656637252861952 |
---|---|
author | Coronado, Pluvio J. Rychlik, Agnieszka Baquedano, Laura García-Pineda, Virginia Martínez-Maestre, Maria A. Querleu, Denis Zapardiel, Ignacio |
author_facet | Coronado, Pluvio J. Rychlik, Agnieszka Baquedano, Laura García-Pineda, Virginia Martínez-Maestre, Maria A. Querleu, Denis Zapardiel, Ignacio |
author_sort | Coronado, Pluvio J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of 1382 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). A total of 684 (49.5%) were operated on by minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 233 (34%) by robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) by conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) by open surgery (OP). Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) outcomes were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP. When matched by age, BMI, co-morbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, the DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact disease-free or overall survival amounts when matched by homogeneous groups, but laparoscopy seems to offer a higher specific overall survival rate compared to the open surgery approach. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgical approach on survival rates in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort of 1382 women diagnosed with EC was performed. A total of 684 (49.5%) women underwent minimally invasive surgery, 233 (34%) underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) underwent conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) underwent open surgery (OP). Sociodemographic features, tumor characteristics, and survival rates were analyzed in the whole sample and in a matched-pair model. (3) Results: Women operated on by OP were significantly older, presented more comorbidities, and had more aggressive tumors. Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) amounts were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP (p < 0.001). When matched by age, body mass index, comorbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, 798 patients were selected. DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. (4) Conclusions: The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact DFS or OS amounts when matched by homogeneous groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88700252022-02-25 Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study Coronado, Pluvio J. Rychlik, Agnieszka Baquedano, Laura García-Pineda, Virginia Martínez-Maestre, Maria A. Querleu, Denis Zapardiel, Ignacio Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of 1382 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). A total of 684 (49.5%) were operated on by minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 233 (34%) by robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) by conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) by open surgery (OP). Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) outcomes were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP. When matched by age, BMI, co-morbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, the DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact disease-free or overall survival amounts when matched by homogeneous groups, but laparoscopy seems to offer a higher specific overall survival rate compared to the open surgery approach. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgical approach on survival rates in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort of 1382 women diagnosed with EC was performed. A total of 684 (49.5%) women underwent minimally invasive surgery, 233 (34%) underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) underwent conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) underwent open surgery (OP). Sociodemographic features, tumor characteristics, and survival rates were analyzed in the whole sample and in a matched-pair model. (3) Results: Women operated on by OP were significantly older, presented more comorbidities, and had more aggressive tumors. Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) amounts were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP (p < 0.001). When matched by age, body mass index, comorbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, 798 patients were selected. DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. (4) Conclusions: The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact DFS or OS amounts when matched by homogeneous groups. MDPI 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8870025/ /pubmed/35205829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041081 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Coronado, Pluvio J. Rychlik, Agnieszka Baquedano, Laura García-Pineda, Virginia Martínez-Maestre, Maria A. Querleu, Denis Zapardiel, Ignacio Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study |
title | Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study |
title_full | Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study |
title_fullStr | Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study |
title_short | Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study |
title_sort | survival analysis in endometrial carcinomas by type of surgical approach: a matched-pair study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coronadopluvioj survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy AT rychlikagnieszka survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy AT baquedanolaura survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy AT garciapinedavirginia survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy AT martinezmaestremariaa survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy AT querleudenis survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy AT zapardielignacio survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy |