Cargando…

Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of 1382 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). A total of 684 (49.5%) were operated on by minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 233 (34%) by robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) by conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coronado, Pluvio J., Rychlik, Agnieszka, Baquedano, Laura, García-Pineda, Virginia, Martínez-Maestre, Maria A., Querleu, Denis, Zapardiel, Ignacio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041081
_version_ 1784656637252861952
author Coronado, Pluvio J.
Rychlik, Agnieszka
Baquedano, Laura
García-Pineda, Virginia
Martínez-Maestre, Maria A.
Querleu, Denis
Zapardiel, Ignacio
author_facet Coronado, Pluvio J.
Rychlik, Agnieszka
Baquedano, Laura
García-Pineda, Virginia
Martínez-Maestre, Maria A.
Querleu, Denis
Zapardiel, Ignacio
author_sort Coronado, Pluvio J.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of 1382 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). A total of 684 (49.5%) were operated on by minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 233 (34%) by robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) by conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) by open surgery (OP). Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) outcomes were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP. When matched by age, BMI, co-morbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, the DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact disease-free or overall survival amounts when matched by homogeneous groups, but laparoscopy seems to offer a higher specific overall survival rate compared to the open surgery approach. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgical approach on survival rates in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort of 1382 women diagnosed with EC was performed. A total of 684 (49.5%) women underwent minimally invasive surgery, 233 (34%) underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) underwent conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) underwent open surgery (OP). Sociodemographic features, tumor characteristics, and survival rates were analyzed in the whole sample and in a matched-pair model. (3) Results: Women operated on by OP were significantly older, presented more comorbidities, and had more aggressive tumors. Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) amounts were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP (p < 0.001). When matched by age, body mass index, comorbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, 798 patients were selected. DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. (4) Conclusions: The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact DFS or OS amounts when matched by homogeneous groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88700252022-02-25 Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study Coronado, Pluvio J. Rychlik, Agnieszka Baquedano, Laura García-Pineda, Virginia Martínez-Maestre, Maria A. Querleu, Denis Zapardiel, Ignacio Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of 1382 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). A total of 684 (49.5%) were operated on by minimally invasive surgery (MIS), 233 (34%) by robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) by conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) by open surgery (OP). Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) outcomes were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP. When matched by age, BMI, co-morbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, the DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact disease-free or overall survival amounts when matched by homogeneous groups, but laparoscopy seems to offer a higher specific overall survival rate compared to the open surgery approach. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: This study aimed to analyze the impact of surgical approach on survival rates in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer. (2) Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort of 1382 women diagnosed with EC was performed. A total of 684 (49.5%) women underwent minimally invasive surgery, 233 (34%) underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL), 451 (66%) underwent conventional laparoscopy (LPS), and 698 (50.5%) underwent open surgery (OP). Sociodemographic features, tumor characteristics, and survival rates were analyzed in the whole sample and in a matched-pair model. (3) Results: Women operated on by OP were significantly older, presented more comorbidities, and had more aggressive tumors. Disease-free (DFS), overall (OS), and specific survival related to EC (SS) amounts were significantly higher for MIS compared to OP (p < 0.001). When matched by age, body mass index, comorbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, and FIGO stage, 798 patients were selected. DFS, OS, and SS amounts were similar between the MIS and OP groups. (4) Conclusions: The surgical approach for women with EC does not impact DFS or OS amounts when matched by homogeneous groups. MDPI 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8870025/ /pubmed/35205829 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041081 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Coronado, Pluvio J.
Rychlik, Agnieszka
Baquedano, Laura
García-Pineda, Virginia
Martínez-Maestre, Maria A.
Querleu, Denis
Zapardiel, Ignacio
Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study
title Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study
title_full Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study
title_fullStr Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study
title_full_unstemmed Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study
title_short Survival Analysis in Endometrial Carcinomas by Type of Surgical Approach: A Matched-Pair Study
title_sort survival analysis in endometrial carcinomas by type of surgical approach: a matched-pair study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205829
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041081
work_keys_str_mv AT coronadopluvioj survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy
AT rychlikagnieszka survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy
AT baquedanolaura survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy
AT garciapinedavirginia survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy
AT martinezmaestremariaa survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy
AT querleudenis survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy
AT zapardielignacio survivalanalysisinendometrialcarcinomasbytypeofsurgicalapproachamatchedpairstudy