Cargando…

The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks

Biomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203246
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11040595
_version_ 1784656647524712448
author Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar
author_facet Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar
author_sort Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar
collection PubMed
description Biomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that drive biomineralization in different species could illuminate the molecular evolution of biomineralization. Skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo was extensively studied and the underlying GRN shows high conservation within echinoderms, larval and adult skeletogenesis. The organic scaffold in which the calcite skeletal elements form in echinoderms is a tubular compartment generated by the syncytial skeletogenic cells. This is strictly different than the organic cartilaginous scaffold that vertebrates mineralize with hydroxyapatite to make their bones. Here I compare the GRNs that drive biomineralization and tubulogenesis in echinoderms and in vertebrates. The GRN that drives skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo shows little similarity to the GRN that drives bone formation and high resemblance to the GRN that drives vertebrates’ vascular tubulogenesis. On the other hand, vertebrates’ bone-GRNs show high similarity to the GRNs that operate in the cells that generate the cartilage-like tissues of basal chordate and invertebrates that do not produce mineralized tissue. These comparisons suggest that biomineralization in deuterostomes evolved through the phylum specific co-option of GRNs that control distinct organic scaffolds to mineralization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88700652022-02-25 The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar Cells Review Biomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that drive biomineralization in different species could illuminate the molecular evolution of biomineralization. Skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo was extensively studied and the underlying GRN shows high conservation within echinoderms, larval and adult skeletogenesis. The organic scaffold in which the calcite skeletal elements form in echinoderms is a tubular compartment generated by the syncytial skeletogenic cells. This is strictly different than the organic cartilaginous scaffold that vertebrates mineralize with hydroxyapatite to make their bones. Here I compare the GRNs that drive biomineralization and tubulogenesis in echinoderms and in vertebrates. The GRN that drives skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo shows little similarity to the GRN that drives bone formation and high resemblance to the GRN that drives vertebrates’ vascular tubulogenesis. On the other hand, vertebrates’ bone-GRNs show high similarity to the GRNs that operate in the cells that generate the cartilage-like tissues of basal chordate and invertebrates that do not produce mineralized tissue. These comparisons suggest that biomineralization in deuterostomes evolved through the phylum specific co-option of GRNs that control distinct organic scaffolds to mineralization. MDPI 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8870065/ /pubmed/35203246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11040595 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar
The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_full The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_fullStr The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_full_unstemmed The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_short The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
title_sort evolution of biomineralization through the co-option of organic scaffold forming networks
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203246
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11040595
work_keys_str_mv AT bentaboudeleonsmadar theevolutionofbiomineralizationthroughthecooptionoforganicscaffoldformingnetworks
AT bentaboudeleonsmadar evolutionofbiomineralizationthroughthecooptionoforganicscaffoldformingnetworks