Cargando…
The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks
Biomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory ne...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11040595 |
_version_ | 1784656647524712448 |
---|---|
author | Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar |
author_facet | Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar |
author_sort | Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that drive biomineralization in different species could illuminate the molecular evolution of biomineralization. Skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo was extensively studied and the underlying GRN shows high conservation within echinoderms, larval and adult skeletogenesis. The organic scaffold in which the calcite skeletal elements form in echinoderms is a tubular compartment generated by the syncytial skeletogenic cells. This is strictly different than the organic cartilaginous scaffold that vertebrates mineralize with hydroxyapatite to make their bones. Here I compare the GRNs that drive biomineralization and tubulogenesis in echinoderms and in vertebrates. The GRN that drives skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo shows little similarity to the GRN that drives bone formation and high resemblance to the GRN that drives vertebrates’ vascular tubulogenesis. On the other hand, vertebrates’ bone-GRNs show high similarity to the GRNs that operate in the cells that generate the cartilage-like tissues of basal chordate and invertebrates that do not produce mineralized tissue. These comparisons suggest that biomineralization in deuterostomes evolved through the phylum specific co-option of GRNs that control distinct organic scaffolds to mineralization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88700652022-02-25 The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar Cells Review Biomineralization is the process in which organisms use minerals to generate hard structures like teeth, skeletons and shells. Biomineralization is proposed to have evolved independently in different phyla through the co-option of pre-existing developmental programs. Comparing the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that drive biomineralization in different species could illuminate the molecular evolution of biomineralization. Skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo was extensively studied and the underlying GRN shows high conservation within echinoderms, larval and adult skeletogenesis. The organic scaffold in which the calcite skeletal elements form in echinoderms is a tubular compartment generated by the syncytial skeletogenic cells. This is strictly different than the organic cartilaginous scaffold that vertebrates mineralize with hydroxyapatite to make their bones. Here I compare the GRNs that drive biomineralization and tubulogenesis in echinoderms and in vertebrates. The GRN that drives skeletogenesis in the sea urchin embryo shows little similarity to the GRN that drives bone formation and high resemblance to the GRN that drives vertebrates’ vascular tubulogenesis. On the other hand, vertebrates’ bone-GRNs show high similarity to the GRNs that operate in the cells that generate the cartilage-like tissues of basal chordate and invertebrates that do not produce mineralized tissue. These comparisons suggest that biomineralization in deuterostomes evolved through the phylum specific co-option of GRNs that control distinct organic scaffolds to mineralization. MDPI 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8870065/ /pubmed/35203246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11040595 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ben-Tabou de-Leon, Smadar The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks |
title | The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks |
title_full | The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks |
title_fullStr | The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks |
title_short | The Evolution of Biomineralization through the Co-Option of Organic Scaffold Forming Networks |
title_sort | evolution of biomineralization through the co-option of organic scaffold forming networks |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203246 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11040595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bentaboudeleonsmadar theevolutionofbiomineralizationthroughthecooptionoforganicscaffoldformingnetworks AT bentaboudeleonsmadar evolutionofbiomineralizationthroughthecooptionoforganicscaffoldformingnetworks |