Cargando…
Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study
The effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) frequency on brain oscillations and cortical excitability are still controversial. Therefore, this study investigated how different tACS frequencies differentially modulate cortical oscillation and inhibition. To do so, we first dete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020195 |
_version_ | 1784656674704850944 |
---|---|
author | Suzuki, Makoto Tanaka, Satoshi Gomez-Tames, Jose Okabe, Takuhiro Cho, Kilchoon Iso, Naoki Hirata, Akimasa |
author_facet | Suzuki, Makoto Tanaka, Satoshi Gomez-Tames, Jose Okabe, Takuhiro Cho, Kilchoon Iso, Naoki Hirata, Akimasa |
author_sort | Suzuki, Makoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | The effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) frequency on brain oscillations and cortical excitability are still controversial. Therefore, this study investigated how different tACS frequencies differentially modulate cortical oscillation and inhibition. To do so, we first determined the optimal positioning of tACS electrodes through an electric field simulation constructed from magnetic resonance images. Seven electrode configurations were tested on the electric field of the precentral gyrus (hand motor area). We determined that the Cz-CP1 configuration was optimal, as it resulted in higher electric field values and minimized the intra-individual differences in the electric field. Therefore, tACS was delivered to the hand motor area through this arrangement at a fixed frequency of 10 Hz (alpha-tACS) or 20 Hz (beta-tACS) with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.6 mA for 20 min. We found that alpha- and beta-tACS resulted in larger alpha and beta oscillations, respectively, compared with the oscillations observed after sham-tACS. In addition, alpha- and beta-tACS decreased the amplitudes of conditioned motor evoked potentials and increased alpha and beta activity, respectively. Correspondingly, alpha- and beta-tACSs enhanced cortical inhibition. These results show that tACS frequency differentially affects motor cortex oscillation and inhibition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88701732022-02-25 Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study Suzuki, Makoto Tanaka, Satoshi Gomez-Tames, Jose Okabe, Takuhiro Cho, Kilchoon Iso, Naoki Hirata, Akimasa Brain Sci Article The effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) frequency on brain oscillations and cortical excitability are still controversial. Therefore, this study investigated how different tACS frequencies differentially modulate cortical oscillation and inhibition. To do so, we first determined the optimal positioning of tACS electrodes through an electric field simulation constructed from magnetic resonance images. Seven electrode configurations were tested on the electric field of the precentral gyrus (hand motor area). We determined that the Cz-CP1 configuration was optimal, as it resulted in higher electric field values and minimized the intra-individual differences in the electric field. Therefore, tACS was delivered to the hand motor area through this arrangement at a fixed frequency of 10 Hz (alpha-tACS) or 20 Hz (beta-tACS) with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.6 mA for 20 min. We found that alpha- and beta-tACS resulted in larger alpha and beta oscillations, respectively, compared with the oscillations observed after sham-tACS. In addition, alpha- and beta-tACS decreased the amplitudes of conditioned motor evoked potentials and increased alpha and beta activity, respectively. Correspondingly, alpha- and beta-tACSs enhanced cortical inhibition. These results show that tACS frequency differentially affects motor cortex oscillation and inhibition. MDPI 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8870173/ /pubmed/35203958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Suzuki, Makoto Tanaka, Satoshi Gomez-Tames, Jose Okabe, Takuhiro Cho, Kilchoon Iso, Naoki Hirata, Akimasa Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study |
title | Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study |
title_full | Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study |
title_fullStr | Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study |
title_short | Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study |
title_sort | nonequivalent after-effects of alternating current stimulation on motor cortex oscillation and inhibition: simulation and experimental study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suzukimakoto nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy AT tanakasatoshi nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy AT gomeztamesjose nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy AT okabetakuhiro nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy AT chokilchoon nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy AT isonaoki nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy AT hirataakimasa nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy |