Cargando…

Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study

The effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) frequency on brain oscillations and cortical excitability are still controversial. Therefore, this study investigated how different tACS frequencies differentially modulate cortical oscillation and inhibition. To do so, we first dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suzuki, Makoto, Tanaka, Satoshi, Gomez-Tames, Jose, Okabe, Takuhiro, Cho, Kilchoon, Iso, Naoki, Hirata, Akimasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020195
_version_ 1784656674704850944
author Suzuki, Makoto
Tanaka, Satoshi
Gomez-Tames, Jose
Okabe, Takuhiro
Cho, Kilchoon
Iso, Naoki
Hirata, Akimasa
author_facet Suzuki, Makoto
Tanaka, Satoshi
Gomez-Tames, Jose
Okabe, Takuhiro
Cho, Kilchoon
Iso, Naoki
Hirata, Akimasa
author_sort Suzuki, Makoto
collection PubMed
description The effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) frequency on brain oscillations and cortical excitability are still controversial. Therefore, this study investigated how different tACS frequencies differentially modulate cortical oscillation and inhibition. To do so, we first determined the optimal positioning of tACS electrodes through an electric field simulation constructed from magnetic resonance images. Seven electrode configurations were tested on the electric field of the precentral gyrus (hand motor area). We determined that the Cz-CP1 configuration was optimal, as it resulted in higher electric field values and minimized the intra-individual differences in the electric field. Therefore, tACS was delivered to the hand motor area through this arrangement at a fixed frequency of 10 Hz (alpha-tACS) or 20 Hz (beta-tACS) with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.6 mA for 20 min. We found that alpha- and beta-tACS resulted in larger alpha and beta oscillations, respectively, compared with the oscillations observed after sham-tACS. In addition, alpha- and beta-tACS decreased the amplitudes of conditioned motor evoked potentials and increased alpha and beta activity, respectively. Correspondingly, alpha- and beta-tACSs enhanced cortical inhibition. These results show that tACS frequency differentially affects motor cortex oscillation and inhibition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88701732022-02-25 Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study Suzuki, Makoto Tanaka, Satoshi Gomez-Tames, Jose Okabe, Takuhiro Cho, Kilchoon Iso, Naoki Hirata, Akimasa Brain Sci Article The effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) frequency on brain oscillations and cortical excitability are still controversial. Therefore, this study investigated how different tACS frequencies differentially modulate cortical oscillation and inhibition. To do so, we first determined the optimal positioning of tACS electrodes through an electric field simulation constructed from magnetic resonance images. Seven electrode configurations were tested on the electric field of the precentral gyrus (hand motor area). We determined that the Cz-CP1 configuration was optimal, as it resulted in higher electric field values and minimized the intra-individual differences in the electric field. Therefore, tACS was delivered to the hand motor area through this arrangement at a fixed frequency of 10 Hz (alpha-tACS) or 20 Hz (beta-tACS) with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.6 mA for 20 min. We found that alpha- and beta-tACS resulted in larger alpha and beta oscillations, respectively, compared with the oscillations observed after sham-tACS. In addition, alpha- and beta-tACS decreased the amplitudes of conditioned motor evoked potentials and increased alpha and beta activity, respectively. Correspondingly, alpha- and beta-tACSs enhanced cortical inhibition. These results show that tACS frequency differentially affects motor cortex oscillation and inhibition. MDPI 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8870173/ /pubmed/35203958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020195 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Suzuki, Makoto
Tanaka, Satoshi
Gomez-Tames, Jose
Okabe, Takuhiro
Cho, Kilchoon
Iso, Naoki
Hirata, Akimasa
Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study
title Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study
title_full Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study
title_fullStr Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study
title_short Nonequivalent After-Effects of Alternating Current Stimulation on Motor Cortex Oscillation and Inhibition: Simulation and Experimental Study
title_sort nonequivalent after-effects of alternating current stimulation on motor cortex oscillation and inhibition: simulation and experimental study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020195
work_keys_str_mv AT suzukimakoto nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy
AT tanakasatoshi nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy
AT gomeztamesjose nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy
AT okabetakuhiro nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy
AT chokilchoon nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy
AT isonaoki nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy
AT hirataakimasa nonequivalentaftereffectsofalternatingcurrentstimulationonmotorcortexoscillationandinhibitionsimulationandexperimentalstudy