Cargando…

Endometrial Cancer: Transitioning from Histology to Genomics

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is traditionally treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on clinicopathological risk factors. The genomic analysis of EC in 2013 and subsequent studies using immunohistochemistry have led to the current EC molecular classification into: polymerase epsilon mut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitric, Cristina, Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020063
_version_ 1784656708875845632
author Mitric, Cristina
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
author_facet Mitric, Cristina
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
author_sort Mitric, Cristina
collection PubMed
description Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is traditionally treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on clinicopathological risk factors. The genomic analysis of EC in 2013 and subsequent studies using immunohistochemistry have led to the current EC molecular classification into: polymerase epsilon mutated (POLEmut), p53 abnormal (p53abn), mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP). The four groups have prognostic value and represent a promising tool for clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant treatment. Molecular classification was integrated into the recent European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) management guidelines. POLEmut EC has favorable outcomes and retrospective studies found that omitting adjuvant treatment is safe in this group; two prospective clinical trials, PORTEC-4 and TAPER, are ongoing to assess this. p53 abn is associated with increased recurrence, decreased survival, and benefitted from chemotherapy in the PORTEC-3 subgroup molecular analysis. The clinical trials PORTEC-4a and CANSTAMP will prospectively assess this. MMRd and NSMP groups have intermediate prognosis and will likely continue to rely closely on clinicopathological features for adjuvant treatment decisions. In addition, the molecular classification has led to exploring novel treatments such as checkpoint inhibitors. Overall, the molecular perspective on EC and associated clinical trials will likely refine EC risk stratification to optimize care and avoid overtreatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88702972022-02-25 Endometrial Cancer: Transitioning from Histology to Genomics Mitric, Cristina Bernardini, Marcus Q. Curr Oncol Review Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is traditionally treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on clinicopathological risk factors. The genomic analysis of EC in 2013 and subsequent studies using immunohistochemistry have led to the current EC molecular classification into: polymerase epsilon mutated (POLEmut), p53 abnormal (p53abn), mismatch repair deficient (MMRd), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP). The four groups have prognostic value and represent a promising tool for clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant treatment. Molecular classification was integrated into the recent European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO) management guidelines. POLEmut EC has favorable outcomes and retrospective studies found that omitting adjuvant treatment is safe in this group; two prospective clinical trials, PORTEC-4 and TAPER, are ongoing to assess this. p53 abn is associated with increased recurrence, decreased survival, and benefitted from chemotherapy in the PORTEC-3 subgroup molecular analysis. The clinical trials PORTEC-4a and CANSTAMP will prospectively assess this. MMRd and NSMP groups have intermediate prognosis and will likely continue to rely closely on clinicopathological features for adjuvant treatment decisions. In addition, the molecular classification has led to exploring novel treatments such as checkpoint inhibitors. Overall, the molecular perspective on EC and associated clinical trials will likely refine EC risk stratification to optimize care and avoid overtreatment. MDPI 2022-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8870297/ /pubmed/35200562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020063 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mitric, Cristina
Bernardini, Marcus Q.
Endometrial Cancer: Transitioning from Histology to Genomics
title Endometrial Cancer: Transitioning from Histology to Genomics
title_full Endometrial Cancer: Transitioning from Histology to Genomics
title_fullStr Endometrial Cancer: Transitioning from Histology to Genomics
title_full_unstemmed Endometrial Cancer: Transitioning from Histology to Genomics
title_short Endometrial Cancer: Transitioning from Histology to Genomics
title_sort endometrial cancer: transitioning from histology to genomics
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870297/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020063
work_keys_str_mv AT mitriccristina endometrialcancertransitioningfromhistologytogenomics
AT bernardinimarcusq endometrialcancertransitioningfromhistologytogenomics