Cargando…
Association between Prior Malignancy Exclusion Criteria and Age Disparities in Cancer Clinical Trials
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Recent studies have shown that the incidence of age disparities in cancer clinical trials may be increasing over time. Excluding patients with prior malignancies is one such eligibility criterion through which elderly may inadvertently be excluded from clinical trial participation. W...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041048 |
_version_ | 1784656728747409408 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Roshal R. Parisi, Rose Verma, Vivek Kouzy, Ramez Abi Jaoude, Joseph Lin, Timothy A. Fuller, Clifton David VanderWalde, Noam A. Jagsi, Reshma Smith, Benjamin D. Guadagnolo, Beverly Ashleigh Thomas, Charles R. Ludmir, Ethan B. |
author_facet | Patel, Roshal R. Parisi, Rose Verma, Vivek Kouzy, Ramez Abi Jaoude, Joseph Lin, Timothy A. Fuller, Clifton David VanderWalde, Noam A. Jagsi, Reshma Smith, Benjamin D. Guadagnolo, Beverly Ashleigh Thomas, Charles R. Ludmir, Ethan B. |
author_sort | Patel, Roshal R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Recent studies have shown that the incidence of age disparities in cancer clinical trials may be increasing over time. Excluding patients with prior malignancies is one such eligibility criterion through which elderly may inadvertently be excluded from clinical trial participation. While strict enrollment criteria may improve internal validity of studies, they can also negatively impact generalizability of results. As such, we sought to characterize the incidence of prior malignancy exclusion criteria in phase III cancer clinical trials and assess if this eligibility criterion may directly contribute to age disparities. These data support efforts to modernize eligibility criteria and inform best practices regarding acceptable versus unacceptable exclusionary timeframes for prior malignancy exclusion criteria. ABSTRACT: Prior malignancy exclusion criteria (PMEC) are often utilized in cancer clinical trials; however, the incidence of PMEC and the association of PMEC with trial participant age disparities remain poorly understood. This study aimed to identify age disparities in oncologic randomized clinical trials as a result of PMEC. Using a comprehensive collection of modern phase III cancer clinical trials obtained via ClinicalTrials.gov, we assessed the incidence and covariates associated with trials excluding patients with prior cancers within 5+ years from registration (PMEC-5). Using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we further sought to determine the correlation between PMEC-5 and age disparities. PMEC-5 were used in 41% of all trials, with higher PMEC-5 utilization among industry-supported trials as well as trials evaluating a targeted therapy. Comparing trial patient median ages with population-matched median ages by disease site and time-period, we assessed the association between PMEC-5 and age disparities among trial participants. PMEC-5 were independently associated with heightened age disparities, which further worsened with longer exclusionary timeframes. Together, PMEC likely contribute to age disparities, suggesting that eligibility criteria modernization through narrower PMEC timeframes may work toward reducing such disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88703792022-02-25 Association between Prior Malignancy Exclusion Criteria and Age Disparities in Cancer Clinical Trials Patel, Roshal R. Parisi, Rose Verma, Vivek Kouzy, Ramez Abi Jaoude, Joseph Lin, Timothy A. Fuller, Clifton David VanderWalde, Noam A. Jagsi, Reshma Smith, Benjamin D. Guadagnolo, Beverly Ashleigh Thomas, Charles R. Ludmir, Ethan B. Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Recent studies have shown that the incidence of age disparities in cancer clinical trials may be increasing over time. Excluding patients with prior malignancies is one such eligibility criterion through which elderly may inadvertently be excluded from clinical trial participation. While strict enrollment criteria may improve internal validity of studies, they can also negatively impact generalizability of results. As such, we sought to characterize the incidence of prior malignancy exclusion criteria in phase III cancer clinical trials and assess if this eligibility criterion may directly contribute to age disparities. These data support efforts to modernize eligibility criteria and inform best practices regarding acceptable versus unacceptable exclusionary timeframes for prior malignancy exclusion criteria. ABSTRACT: Prior malignancy exclusion criteria (PMEC) are often utilized in cancer clinical trials; however, the incidence of PMEC and the association of PMEC with trial participant age disparities remain poorly understood. This study aimed to identify age disparities in oncologic randomized clinical trials as a result of PMEC. Using a comprehensive collection of modern phase III cancer clinical trials obtained via ClinicalTrials.gov, we assessed the incidence and covariates associated with trials excluding patients with prior cancers within 5+ years from registration (PMEC-5). Using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we further sought to determine the correlation between PMEC-5 and age disparities. PMEC-5 were used in 41% of all trials, with higher PMEC-5 utilization among industry-supported trials as well as trials evaluating a targeted therapy. Comparing trial patient median ages with population-matched median ages by disease site and time-period, we assessed the association between PMEC-5 and age disparities among trial participants. PMEC-5 were independently associated with heightened age disparities, which further worsened with longer exclusionary timeframes. Together, PMEC likely contribute to age disparities, suggesting that eligibility criteria modernization through narrower PMEC timeframes may work toward reducing such disparities in cancer clinical trial enrollment. MDPI 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8870379/ /pubmed/35205795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041048 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Patel, Roshal R. Parisi, Rose Verma, Vivek Kouzy, Ramez Abi Jaoude, Joseph Lin, Timothy A. Fuller, Clifton David VanderWalde, Noam A. Jagsi, Reshma Smith, Benjamin D. Guadagnolo, Beverly Ashleigh Thomas, Charles R. Ludmir, Ethan B. Association between Prior Malignancy Exclusion Criteria and Age Disparities in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title | Association between Prior Malignancy Exclusion Criteria and Age Disparities in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_full | Association between Prior Malignancy Exclusion Criteria and Age Disparities in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | Association between Prior Malignancy Exclusion Criteria and Age Disparities in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Association between Prior Malignancy Exclusion Criteria and Age Disparities in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_short | Association between Prior Malignancy Exclusion Criteria and Age Disparities in Cancer Clinical Trials |
title_sort | association between prior malignancy exclusion criteria and age disparities in cancer clinical trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205795 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelroshalr associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT parisirose associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT vermavivek associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT kouzyramez associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT abijaoudejoseph associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT lintimothya associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT fullercliftondavid associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT vanderwaldenoama associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT jagsireshma associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT smithbenjamind associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT guadagnolobeverlyashleigh associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT thomascharlesr associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials AT ludmirethanb associationbetweenpriormalignancyexclusioncriteriaandagedisparitiesincancerclinicaltrials |