Cargando…

Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval

Does experience with signed language impact the neurocognitive processes recruited by adults solving arithmetic problems? We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to identify the components that are modulated by operation type and problem size in Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) native signers and i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berteletti, Ilaria, Kimbley, Sarah E., Sullivan, SaraBeth J., Quandt, Lorna C., Miyakoshi, Makoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020145
_version_ 1784656731880554496
author Berteletti, Ilaria
Kimbley, Sarah E.
Sullivan, SaraBeth J.
Quandt, Lorna C.
Miyakoshi, Makoto
author_facet Berteletti, Ilaria
Kimbley, Sarah E.
Sullivan, SaraBeth J.
Quandt, Lorna C.
Miyakoshi, Makoto
author_sort Berteletti, Ilaria
collection PubMed
description Does experience with signed language impact the neurocognitive processes recruited by adults solving arithmetic problems? We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to identify the components that are modulated by operation type and problem size in Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) native signers and in hearing English-speaking participants. Participants were presented with single-digit subtraction and multiplication problems in a delayed verification task. Problem size was manipulated in small and large problems with an additional extra-large subtraction condition to equate the overall magnitude of large multiplication problems. Results show comparable behavioral results and similar ERP dissociations across groups. First, an early operation type effect is observed around 200 ms post-problem onset, suggesting that both groups have a similar attentional differentiation for processing subtraction and multiplication problems. Second, for the posterior-occipital component between 240 ms and 300 ms, subtraction problems show a similar modulation with problem size in both groups, suggesting that only subtraction problems recruit quantity-related processes. Control analyses exclude possible perceptual and cross-operation magnitude-related effects. These results are the first evidence that the two operation types rely on distinct cognitive processes within the ASL native signing population and that they are equivalent to those observed in the English-speaking population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88703922022-02-25 Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval Berteletti, Ilaria Kimbley, Sarah E. Sullivan, SaraBeth J. Quandt, Lorna C. Miyakoshi, Makoto Brain Sci Article Does experience with signed language impact the neurocognitive processes recruited by adults solving arithmetic problems? We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to identify the components that are modulated by operation type and problem size in Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) native signers and in hearing English-speaking participants. Participants were presented with single-digit subtraction and multiplication problems in a delayed verification task. Problem size was manipulated in small and large problems with an additional extra-large subtraction condition to equate the overall magnitude of large multiplication problems. Results show comparable behavioral results and similar ERP dissociations across groups. First, an early operation type effect is observed around 200 ms post-problem onset, suggesting that both groups have a similar attentional differentiation for processing subtraction and multiplication problems. Second, for the posterior-occipital component between 240 ms and 300 ms, subtraction problems show a similar modulation with problem size in both groups, suggesting that only subtraction problems recruit quantity-related processes. Control analyses exclude possible perceptual and cross-operation magnitude-related effects. These results are the first evidence that the two operation types rely on distinct cognitive processes within the ASL native signing population and that they are equivalent to those observed in the English-speaking population. MDPI 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8870392/ /pubmed/35203909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020145 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Berteletti, Ilaria
Kimbley, Sarah E.
Sullivan, SaraBeth J.
Quandt, Lorna C.
Miyakoshi, Makoto
Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval
title Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval
title_full Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval
title_fullStr Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval
title_full_unstemmed Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval
title_short Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval
title_sort different language modalities yet similar cognitive processes in arithmetic fact retrieval
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020145
work_keys_str_mv AT bertelettiilaria differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval
AT kimbleysarahe differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval
AT sullivansarabethj differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval
AT quandtlornac differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval
AT miyakoshimakoto differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval