Cargando…
Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval
Does experience with signed language impact the neurocognitive processes recruited by adults solving arithmetic problems? We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to identify the components that are modulated by operation type and problem size in Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) native signers and i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020145 |
_version_ | 1784656731880554496 |
---|---|
author | Berteletti, Ilaria Kimbley, Sarah E. Sullivan, SaraBeth J. Quandt, Lorna C. Miyakoshi, Makoto |
author_facet | Berteletti, Ilaria Kimbley, Sarah E. Sullivan, SaraBeth J. Quandt, Lorna C. Miyakoshi, Makoto |
author_sort | Berteletti, Ilaria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Does experience with signed language impact the neurocognitive processes recruited by adults solving arithmetic problems? We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to identify the components that are modulated by operation type and problem size in Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) native signers and in hearing English-speaking participants. Participants were presented with single-digit subtraction and multiplication problems in a delayed verification task. Problem size was manipulated in small and large problems with an additional extra-large subtraction condition to equate the overall magnitude of large multiplication problems. Results show comparable behavioral results and similar ERP dissociations across groups. First, an early operation type effect is observed around 200 ms post-problem onset, suggesting that both groups have a similar attentional differentiation for processing subtraction and multiplication problems. Second, for the posterior-occipital component between 240 ms and 300 ms, subtraction problems show a similar modulation with problem size in both groups, suggesting that only subtraction problems recruit quantity-related processes. Control analyses exclude possible perceptual and cross-operation magnitude-related effects. These results are the first evidence that the two operation types rely on distinct cognitive processes within the ASL native signing population and that they are equivalent to those observed in the English-speaking population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88703922022-02-25 Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval Berteletti, Ilaria Kimbley, Sarah E. Sullivan, SaraBeth J. Quandt, Lorna C. Miyakoshi, Makoto Brain Sci Article Does experience with signed language impact the neurocognitive processes recruited by adults solving arithmetic problems? We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to identify the components that are modulated by operation type and problem size in Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) native signers and in hearing English-speaking participants. Participants were presented with single-digit subtraction and multiplication problems in a delayed verification task. Problem size was manipulated in small and large problems with an additional extra-large subtraction condition to equate the overall magnitude of large multiplication problems. Results show comparable behavioral results and similar ERP dissociations across groups. First, an early operation type effect is observed around 200 ms post-problem onset, suggesting that both groups have a similar attentional differentiation for processing subtraction and multiplication problems. Second, for the posterior-occipital component between 240 ms and 300 ms, subtraction problems show a similar modulation with problem size in both groups, suggesting that only subtraction problems recruit quantity-related processes. Control analyses exclude possible perceptual and cross-operation magnitude-related effects. These results are the first evidence that the two operation types rely on distinct cognitive processes within the ASL native signing population and that they are equivalent to those observed in the English-speaking population. MDPI 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8870392/ /pubmed/35203909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020145 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Berteletti, Ilaria Kimbley, Sarah E. Sullivan, SaraBeth J. Quandt, Lorna C. Miyakoshi, Makoto Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval |
title | Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval |
title_full | Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval |
title_fullStr | Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval |
title_full_unstemmed | Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval |
title_short | Different Language Modalities Yet Similar Cognitive Processes in Arithmetic Fact Retrieval |
title_sort | different language modalities yet similar cognitive processes in arithmetic fact retrieval |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bertelettiilaria differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval AT kimbleysarahe differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval AT sullivansarabethj differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval AT quandtlornac differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval AT miyakoshimakoto differentlanguagemodalitiesyetsimilarcognitiveprocessesinarithmeticfactretrieval |