Cargando…

The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Germline genetic testing for patients with cancer can have important implications for treatment, preventive options, and for family members. In a mainstream genetic testing pathway, pre-test counseling is performed by non-genetic healthcare professionals, thereby making genetic testi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bokkers, Kyra, Vlaming, Michiel, Engelhardt, Ellen G., Zweemer, Ronald P., van Oort, Inge M., Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M., Bleiker, Eveline M. A., Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041059
_version_ 1784656783973810176
author Bokkers, Kyra
Vlaming, Michiel
Engelhardt, Ellen G.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
van Oort, Inge M.
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
author_facet Bokkers, Kyra
Vlaming, Michiel
Engelhardt, Ellen G.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
van Oort, Inge M.
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
author_sort Bokkers, Kyra
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Germline genetic testing for patients with cancer can have important implications for treatment, preventive options, and for family members. In a mainstream genetic testing pathway, pre-test counseling is performed by non-genetic healthcare professionals, thereby making genetic testing more accessible to all patients who might benefit from it. These mainstream genetic testing pathways are being implemented in different hospitals around the world, and for different cancer types. It is important to evaluate how a mainstream genetic testing pathway can be made sustainable and if quality of genetic care is maintained. We show in this systematic review that it is feasible to incorporate a mainstream genetic testing pathway into routine cancer care while maintaining quality of care. A training procedure for non-genetic healthcare professionals and a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments are highly recommended to ensure sustainability. ABSTRACT: Background: Non-genetic healthcare professionals can provide pre-test counseling and order germline genetic tests themselves, which is called mainstream genetic testing. In this systematic review, we determined whether mainstream genetic testing was feasible in daily practice while maintaining quality of genetic care. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched for articles describing mainstream genetic testing initiatives in cancer care. Results: Seventeen articles, reporting on 15 studies, met the inclusion criteria. Non-genetic healthcare professionals concluded that mainstream genetic testing was possible within the timeframe of a routine consultation. In 14 studies, non-genetic healthcare professionals completed some form of training about genetics. When referral was coordinated by a genetics team, the majority of patients carrying a pathogenic variant were seen for post-test counseling by genetic healthcare professionals. The number of days between cancer diagnosis and test result disclosure was always lower in the mainstream genetic testing pathway than in the standard genetic testing pathway (e.g., pre-test counseling at genetics department). Conclusions: Mainstream genetic testing seems feasible in daily practice with no insurmountable barriers. A structured pathway with a training procedure is desirable, as well as a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88705482022-02-25 The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review Bokkers, Kyra Vlaming, Michiel Engelhardt, Ellen G. Zweemer, Ronald P. van Oort, Inge M. Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M. Bleiker, Eveline M. A. Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Germline genetic testing for patients with cancer can have important implications for treatment, preventive options, and for family members. In a mainstream genetic testing pathway, pre-test counseling is performed by non-genetic healthcare professionals, thereby making genetic testing more accessible to all patients who might benefit from it. These mainstream genetic testing pathways are being implemented in different hospitals around the world, and for different cancer types. It is important to evaluate how a mainstream genetic testing pathway can be made sustainable and if quality of genetic care is maintained. We show in this systematic review that it is feasible to incorporate a mainstream genetic testing pathway into routine cancer care while maintaining quality of care. A training procedure for non-genetic healthcare professionals and a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments are highly recommended to ensure sustainability. ABSTRACT: Background: Non-genetic healthcare professionals can provide pre-test counseling and order germline genetic tests themselves, which is called mainstream genetic testing. In this systematic review, we determined whether mainstream genetic testing was feasible in daily practice while maintaining quality of genetic care. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched for articles describing mainstream genetic testing initiatives in cancer care. Results: Seventeen articles, reporting on 15 studies, met the inclusion criteria. Non-genetic healthcare professionals concluded that mainstream genetic testing was possible within the timeframe of a routine consultation. In 14 studies, non-genetic healthcare professionals completed some form of training about genetics. When referral was coordinated by a genetics team, the majority of patients carrying a pathogenic variant were seen for post-test counseling by genetic healthcare professionals. The number of days between cancer diagnosis and test result disclosure was always lower in the mainstream genetic testing pathway than in the standard genetic testing pathway (e.g., pre-test counseling at genetics department). Conclusions: Mainstream genetic testing seems feasible in daily practice with no insurmountable barriers. A structured pathway with a training procedure is desirable, as well as a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments. MDPI 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8870548/ /pubmed/35205807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041059 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Bokkers, Kyra
Vlaming, Michiel
Engelhardt, Ellen G.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
van Oort, Inge M.
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review
title The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review
title_full The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review
title_short The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review
title_sort feasibility of implementing mainstream germline genetic testing in routine cancer care—a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205807
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041059
work_keys_str_mv AT bokkerskyra thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT vlamingmichiel thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT engelhardtelleng thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT zweemerronaldp thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT vanoortingem thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT kiemeneylambertusalm thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT bleikerevelinema thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT ausemsmargreetgem thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT bokkerskyra feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT vlamingmichiel feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT engelhardtelleng feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT zweemerronaldp feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT vanoortingem feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT kiemeneylambertusalm feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT bleikerevelinema feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview
AT ausemsmargreetgem feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview