Cargando…
The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Germline genetic testing for patients with cancer can have important implications for treatment, preventive options, and for family members. In a mainstream genetic testing pathway, pre-test counseling is performed by non-genetic healthcare professionals, thereby making genetic testi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041059 |
_version_ | 1784656783973810176 |
---|---|
author | Bokkers, Kyra Vlaming, Michiel Engelhardt, Ellen G. Zweemer, Ronald P. van Oort, Inge M. Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M. Bleiker, Eveline M. A. Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. |
author_facet | Bokkers, Kyra Vlaming, Michiel Engelhardt, Ellen G. Zweemer, Ronald P. van Oort, Inge M. Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M. Bleiker, Eveline M. A. Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. |
author_sort | Bokkers, Kyra |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Germline genetic testing for patients with cancer can have important implications for treatment, preventive options, and for family members. In a mainstream genetic testing pathway, pre-test counseling is performed by non-genetic healthcare professionals, thereby making genetic testing more accessible to all patients who might benefit from it. These mainstream genetic testing pathways are being implemented in different hospitals around the world, and for different cancer types. It is important to evaluate how a mainstream genetic testing pathway can be made sustainable and if quality of genetic care is maintained. We show in this systematic review that it is feasible to incorporate a mainstream genetic testing pathway into routine cancer care while maintaining quality of care. A training procedure for non-genetic healthcare professionals and a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments are highly recommended to ensure sustainability. ABSTRACT: Background: Non-genetic healthcare professionals can provide pre-test counseling and order germline genetic tests themselves, which is called mainstream genetic testing. In this systematic review, we determined whether mainstream genetic testing was feasible in daily practice while maintaining quality of genetic care. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched for articles describing mainstream genetic testing initiatives in cancer care. Results: Seventeen articles, reporting on 15 studies, met the inclusion criteria. Non-genetic healthcare professionals concluded that mainstream genetic testing was possible within the timeframe of a routine consultation. In 14 studies, non-genetic healthcare professionals completed some form of training about genetics. When referral was coordinated by a genetics team, the majority of patients carrying a pathogenic variant were seen for post-test counseling by genetic healthcare professionals. The number of days between cancer diagnosis and test result disclosure was always lower in the mainstream genetic testing pathway than in the standard genetic testing pathway (e.g., pre-test counseling at genetics department). Conclusions: Mainstream genetic testing seems feasible in daily practice with no insurmountable barriers. A structured pathway with a training procedure is desirable, as well as a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88705482022-02-25 The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review Bokkers, Kyra Vlaming, Michiel Engelhardt, Ellen G. Zweemer, Ronald P. van Oort, Inge M. Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M. Bleiker, Eveline M. A. Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Germline genetic testing for patients with cancer can have important implications for treatment, preventive options, and for family members. In a mainstream genetic testing pathway, pre-test counseling is performed by non-genetic healthcare professionals, thereby making genetic testing more accessible to all patients who might benefit from it. These mainstream genetic testing pathways are being implemented in different hospitals around the world, and for different cancer types. It is important to evaluate how a mainstream genetic testing pathway can be made sustainable and if quality of genetic care is maintained. We show in this systematic review that it is feasible to incorporate a mainstream genetic testing pathway into routine cancer care while maintaining quality of care. A training procedure for non-genetic healthcare professionals and a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments are highly recommended to ensure sustainability. ABSTRACT: Background: Non-genetic healthcare professionals can provide pre-test counseling and order germline genetic tests themselves, which is called mainstream genetic testing. In this systematic review, we determined whether mainstream genetic testing was feasible in daily practice while maintaining quality of genetic care. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched for articles describing mainstream genetic testing initiatives in cancer care. Results: Seventeen articles, reporting on 15 studies, met the inclusion criteria. Non-genetic healthcare professionals concluded that mainstream genetic testing was possible within the timeframe of a routine consultation. In 14 studies, non-genetic healthcare professionals completed some form of training about genetics. When referral was coordinated by a genetics team, the majority of patients carrying a pathogenic variant were seen for post-test counseling by genetic healthcare professionals. The number of days between cancer diagnosis and test result disclosure was always lower in the mainstream genetic testing pathway than in the standard genetic testing pathway (e.g., pre-test counseling at genetics department). Conclusions: Mainstream genetic testing seems feasible in daily practice with no insurmountable barriers. A structured pathway with a training procedure is desirable, as well as a close collaboration between genetics and other clinical departments. MDPI 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8870548/ /pubmed/35205807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041059 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Bokkers, Kyra Vlaming, Michiel Engelhardt, Ellen G. Zweemer, Ronald P. van Oort, Inge M. Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M. Bleiker, Eveline M. A. Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review |
title | The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Feasibility of Implementing Mainstream Germline Genetic Testing in Routine Cancer Care—A Systematic Review |
title_sort | feasibility of implementing mainstream germline genetic testing in routine cancer care—a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205807 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bokkerskyra thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT vlamingmichiel thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT engelhardtelleng thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT zweemerronaldp thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT vanoortingem thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT kiemeneylambertusalm thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT bleikerevelinema thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT ausemsmargreetgem thefeasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT bokkerskyra feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT vlamingmichiel feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT engelhardtelleng feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT zweemerronaldp feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT vanoortingem feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT kiemeneylambertusalm feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT bleikerevelinema feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview AT ausemsmargreetgem feasibilityofimplementingmainstreamgermlinegenetictestinginroutinecancercareasystematicreview |