Cargando…
No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities
Acute aerobic high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has demonstrated positive effects on inhibitory control and P3 event-related potential (ERP) in young adults. However, the evidence is not well established regarding the effects of different HIIE modalities that incorporate aerobic-resistance tra...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020185 |
_version_ | 1784656793955205120 |
---|---|
author | Drollette, Eric S. Johnson, Megan N. Meadows, Caroline C. |
author_facet | Drollette, Eric S. Johnson, Megan N. Meadows, Caroline C. |
author_sort | Drollette, Eric S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Acute aerobic high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has demonstrated positive effects on inhibitory control and P3 event-related potential (ERP) in young adults. However, the evidence is not well established regarding the effects of different HIIE modalities that incorporate aerobic-resistance training on these cognitive and neurocognitive outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the transient effects of HIIE-aerobic and HIIE-aerobic/resistance on P3 and Flanker task performance. Participants (n = 24; 18–25 years old) completed the Flanker task at two time points (30 min and 85 min) following 9 min of HIIE-aerobic (intermittent bouts of walking and running at 90% of maximal heart rate), HIIE-aerobic/resistance (intermittent bouts of walking and high-intensity calisthenics), and seated rest on three separate counterbalanced days. Results revealed no changes in Flanker performance (i.e., reaction time and response accuracy) or P3 (latency and mean amplitude) following either HIIE conditions compared to seated rest. Together, these data suggest inhibitory control and neuroelectric underpinnings are not affected by different modalities of HIIE at 30 min and 85 min post-exercise. Such findings reveal that engaging in short bouts of different HIIE modalities for overall health neither improves nor diminishes inhibitory control and brain function for an extended period throughout the day. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88705892022-02-25 No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities Drollette, Eric S. Johnson, Megan N. Meadows, Caroline C. Brain Sci Article Acute aerobic high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has demonstrated positive effects on inhibitory control and P3 event-related potential (ERP) in young adults. However, the evidence is not well established regarding the effects of different HIIE modalities that incorporate aerobic-resistance training on these cognitive and neurocognitive outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the transient effects of HIIE-aerobic and HIIE-aerobic/resistance on P3 and Flanker task performance. Participants (n = 24; 18–25 years old) completed the Flanker task at two time points (30 min and 85 min) following 9 min of HIIE-aerobic (intermittent bouts of walking and running at 90% of maximal heart rate), HIIE-aerobic/resistance (intermittent bouts of walking and high-intensity calisthenics), and seated rest on three separate counterbalanced days. Results revealed no changes in Flanker performance (i.e., reaction time and response accuracy) or P3 (latency and mean amplitude) following either HIIE conditions compared to seated rest. Together, these data suggest inhibitory control and neuroelectric underpinnings are not affected by different modalities of HIIE at 30 min and 85 min post-exercise. Such findings reveal that engaging in short bouts of different HIIE modalities for overall health neither improves nor diminishes inhibitory control and brain function for an extended period throughout the day. MDPI 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8870589/ /pubmed/35203949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020185 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Drollette, Eric S. Johnson, Megan N. Meadows, Caroline C. No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities |
title | No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities |
title_full | No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities |
title_fullStr | No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities |
title_full_unstemmed | No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities |
title_short | No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities |
title_sort | no change in inhibitory control or p3 following different high-intensity interval exercise modalities |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drolletteerics nochangeininhibitorycontrolorp3followingdifferenthighintensityintervalexercisemodalities AT johnsonmegann nochangeininhibitorycontrolorp3followingdifferenthighintensityintervalexercisemodalities AT meadowscarolinec nochangeininhibitorycontrolorp3followingdifferenthighintensityintervalexercisemodalities |