Cargando…

No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities

Acute aerobic high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has demonstrated positive effects on inhibitory control and P3 event-related potential (ERP) in young adults. However, the evidence is not well established regarding the effects of different HIIE modalities that incorporate aerobic-resistance tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drollette, Eric S., Johnson, Megan N., Meadows, Caroline C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020185
_version_ 1784656793955205120
author Drollette, Eric S.
Johnson, Megan N.
Meadows, Caroline C.
author_facet Drollette, Eric S.
Johnson, Megan N.
Meadows, Caroline C.
author_sort Drollette, Eric S.
collection PubMed
description Acute aerobic high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has demonstrated positive effects on inhibitory control and P3 event-related potential (ERP) in young adults. However, the evidence is not well established regarding the effects of different HIIE modalities that incorporate aerobic-resistance training on these cognitive and neurocognitive outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the transient effects of HIIE-aerobic and HIIE-aerobic/resistance on P3 and Flanker task performance. Participants (n = 24; 18–25 years old) completed the Flanker task at two time points (30 min and 85 min) following 9 min of HIIE-aerobic (intermittent bouts of walking and running at 90% of maximal heart rate), HIIE-aerobic/resistance (intermittent bouts of walking and high-intensity calisthenics), and seated rest on three separate counterbalanced days. Results revealed no changes in Flanker performance (i.e., reaction time and response accuracy) or P3 (latency and mean amplitude) following either HIIE conditions compared to seated rest. Together, these data suggest inhibitory control and neuroelectric underpinnings are not affected by different modalities of HIIE at 30 min and 85 min post-exercise. Such findings reveal that engaging in short bouts of different HIIE modalities for overall health neither improves nor diminishes inhibitory control and brain function for an extended period throughout the day.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88705892022-02-25 No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities Drollette, Eric S. Johnson, Megan N. Meadows, Caroline C. Brain Sci Article Acute aerobic high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has demonstrated positive effects on inhibitory control and P3 event-related potential (ERP) in young adults. However, the evidence is not well established regarding the effects of different HIIE modalities that incorporate aerobic-resistance training on these cognitive and neurocognitive outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the transient effects of HIIE-aerobic and HIIE-aerobic/resistance on P3 and Flanker task performance. Participants (n = 24; 18–25 years old) completed the Flanker task at two time points (30 min and 85 min) following 9 min of HIIE-aerobic (intermittent bouts of walking and running at 90% of maximal heart rate), HIIE-aerobic/resistance (intermittent bouts of walking and high-intensity calisthenics), and seated rest on three separate counterbalanced days. Results revealed no changes in Flanker performance (i.e., reaction time and response accuracy) or P3 (latency and mean amplitude) following either HIIE conditions compared to seated rest. Together, these data suggest inhibitory control and neuroelectric underpinnings are not affected by different modalities of HIIE at 30 min and 85 min post-exercise. Such findings reveal that engaging in short bouts of different HIIE modalities for overall health neither improves nor diminishes inhibitory control and brain function for an extended period throughout the day. MDPI 2022-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8870589/ /pubmed/35203949 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020185 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Drollette, Eric S.
Johnson, Megan N.
Meadows, Caroline C.
No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities
title No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities
title_full No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities
title_fullStr No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities
title_full_unstemmed No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities
title_short No Change in Inhibitory Control or P3 Following Different High-Intensity Interval Exercise Modalities
title_sort no change in inhibitory control or p3 following different high-intensity interval exercise modalities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35203949
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12020185
work_keys_str_mv AT drolletteerics nochangeininhibitorycontrolorp3followingdifferenthighintensityintervalexercisemodalities
AT johnsonmegann nochangeininhibitorycontrolorp3followingdifferenthighintensityintervalexercisemodalities
AT meadowscarolinec nochangeininhibitorycontrolorp3followingdifferenthighintensityintervalexercisemodalities