Cargando…
Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review
Objective: To provide recommendations for preferred models of follow-up care for stage I-IV colorectal (CRC) cancer survivors in Ontario; to identify signs and symptoms of potential recurrence and when to investigate; and to evaluate patient information and support needs during the post-treatment su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020040 |
_version_ | 1784656815428993024 |
---|---|
author | Galica, Jacqueline Zwaal, Caroline Kennedy, Erin Asmis, Tim Cho, Charles Ginty, Alexandra Govindarajan, Anand |
author_facet | Galica, Jacqueline Zwaal, Caroline Kennedy, Erin Asmis, Tim Cho, Charles Ginty, Alexandra Govindarajan, Anand |
author_sort | Galica, Jacqueline |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To provide recommendations for preferred models of follow-up care for stage I-IV colorectal (CRC) cancer survivors in Ontario; to identify signs and symptoms of potential recurrence and when to investigate; and to evaluate patient information and support needs during the post-treatment survivorship period. Methods: Consistent with the Program in Evidence-Based Medicine’s standardized approach, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO databases were systematically searched. The authors drafted recommendations and revised them based on the comments from internal and external reviewers. Results: Four guidelines, three systematic reviews, three randomized controlled trials, and three cohort studies provided evidence to develop recommendations. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer follow-up care is complex and requires multidisciplinary, coordinated care delivered by the cancer specialist, primary care provider, and allied health professionals. While there is limited evidence to support a shared care model for follow-up, this approach is deemed to be best suited to meet patient needs; however, the roles and responsibilities of care providers need to be clearly defined, and patients need to know when and how to contact them. Although there is insufficient evidence to recommend any individual or combination of signs or symptoms as strong predictor(s) of recurrence, patients should be educated about these and know which care provider to contact if they develop any new or concerning symptoms. Psychosocial support and empathetic, effective, and coordinated communication are most valued by patients for their post-treatment follow-up care. Continuing professional education should emphasize the importance of communication skills and coordination of communication between the patient, family, and healthcare providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88706782022-02-25 Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review Galica, Jacqueline Zwaal, Caroline Kennedy, Erin Asmis, Tim Cho, Charles Ginty, Alexandra Govindarajan, Anand Curr Oncol Guidelines Objective: To provide recommendations for preferred models of follow-up care for stage I-IV colorectal (CRC) cancer survivors in Ontario; to identify signs and symptoms of potential recurrence and when to investigate; and to evaluate patient information and support needs during the post-treatment survivorship period. Methods: Consistent with the Program in Evidence-Based Medicine’s standardized approach, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO databases were systematically searched. The authors drafted recommendations and revised them based on the comments from internal and external reviewers. Results: Four guidelines, three systematic reviews, three randomized controlled trials, and three cohort studies provided evidence to develop recommendations. Conclusions: Colorectal cancer follow-up care is complex and requires multidisciplinary, coordinated care delivered by the cancer specialist, primary care provider, and allied health professionals. While there is limited evidence to support a shared care model for follow-up, this approach is deemed to be best suited to meet patient needs; however, the roles and responsibilities of care providers need to be clearly defined, and patients need to know when and how to contact them. Although there is insufficient evidence to recommend any individual or combination of signs or symptoms as strong predictor(s) of recurrence, patients should be educated about these and know which care provider to contact if they develop any new or concerning symptoms. Psychosocial support and empathetic, effective, and coordinated communication are most valued by patients for their post-treatment follow-up care. Continuing professional education should emphasize the importance of communication skills and coordination of communication between the patient, family, and healthcare providers. MDPI 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8870678/ /pubmed/35200540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020040 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Guidelines Galica, Jacqueline Zwaal, Caroline Kennedy, Erin Asmis, Tim Cho, Charles Ginty, Alexandra Govindarajan, Anand Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review |
title | Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review |
title_full | Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review |
title_short | Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review |
title_sort | models of follow-up care and secondary prevention measures for survivors of colorectal cancer: evidence-based guidelines and systematic review |
topic | Guidelines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galicajacqueline modelsoffollowupcareandsecondarypreventionmeasuresforsurvivorsofcolorectalcancerevidencebasedguidelinesandsystematicreview AT zwaalcaroline modelsoffollowupcareandsecondarypreventionmeasuresforsurvivorsofcolorectalcancerevidencebasedguidelinesandsystematicreview AT kennedyerin modelsoffollowupcareandsecondarypreventionmeasuresforsurvivorsofcolorectalcancerevidencebasedguidelinesandsystematicreview AT asmistim modelsoffollowupcareandsecondarypreventionmeasuresforsurvivorsofcolorectalcancerevidencebasedguidelinesandsystematicreview AT chocharles modelsoffollowupcareandsecondarypreventionmeasuresforsurvivorsofcolorectalcancerevidencebasedguidelinesandsystematicreview AT gintyalexandra modelsoffollowupcareandsecondarypreventionmeasuresforsurvivorsofcolorectalcancerevidencebasedguidelinesandsystematicreview AT govindarajananand modelsoffollowupcareandsecondarypreventionmeasuresforsurvivorsofcolorectalcancerevidencebasedguidelinesandsystematicreview |