Cargando…

Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty

Assessing the intraocular pressure is a difficult but crucial task in the follow-up of patients that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Early recognition of elevated intraocular pressure and/or glaucoma and establishment of the appropriate treatment is essential to ensure the best possible vis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dumitrescu, Otilia-Maria, Istrate, Sinziana, Macovei, Mioara-Laura, Gheorghe, Alina Gabriela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020234
_version_ 1784656840054800384
author Dumitrescu, Otilia-Maria
Istrate, Sinziana
Macovei, Mioara-Laura
Gheorghe, Alina Gabriela
author_facet Dumitrescu, Otilia-Maria
Istrate, Sinziana
Macovei, Mioara-Laura
Gheorghe, Alina Gabriela
author_sort Dumitrescu, Otilia-Maria
collection PubMed
description Assessing the intraocular pressure is a difficult but crucial task in the follow-up of patients that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Early recognition of elevated intraocular pressure and/or glaucoma and establishment of the appropriate treatment is essential to ensure the best possible visual outcome for patients dealing with this feared complication. Although Goldmann applanation tonometry is still the gold standard for measuring the intraocular pressure, its limitations in postkeratoplasty eyes, due to postoperative modified corneal morphology, have led to the search for more suitable alternatives. This review is the result of a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE database that aims to present glaucoma in the context of perforating keratoplasty, the corneal properties with impact on ocular pressure measurement, and the results achieved with the most important tonometers that have been studied in this pathology. Goldmann applanation tonometry remains the reference for intraocular pressure assessment even in corneas after penetrating keratoplasty. However, some promising alternatives have emerged, the most important of which are the Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, the ocular response analyzer, and the iCare. All have advantages and disadvantages but have proved to be appropriate alternatives, especially in cases in which Goldmann applanation tonometry cannot be used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88707832022-02-25 Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty Dumitrescu, Otilia-Maria Istrate, Sinziana Macovei, Mioara-Laura Gheorghe, Alina Gabriela Diagnostics (Basel) Review Assessing the intraocular pressure is a difficult but crucial task in the follow-up of patients that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Early recognition of elevated intraocular pressure and/or glaucoma and establishment of the appropriate treatment is essential to ensure the best possible visual outcome for patients dealing with this feared complication. Although Goldmann applanation tonometry is still the gold standard for measuring the intraocular pressure, its limitations in postkeratoplasty eyes, due to postoperative modified corneal morphology, have led to the search for more suitable alternatives. This review is the result of a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE database that aims to present glaucoma in the context of perforating keratoplasty, the corneal properties with impact on ocular pressure measurement, and the results achieved with the most important tonometers that have been studied in this pathology. Goldmann applanation tonometry remains the reference for intraocular pressure assessment even in corneas after penetrating keratoplasty. However, some promising alternatives have emerged, the most important of which are the Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, the ocular response analyzer, and the iCare. All have advantages and disadvantages but have proved to be appropriate alternatives, especially in cases in which Goldmann applanation tonometry cannot be used. MDPI 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8870783/ /pubmed/35204325 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020234 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Dumitrescu, Otilia-Maria
Istrate, Sinziana
Macovei, Mioara-Laura
Gheorghe, Alina Gabriela
Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty
title Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_full Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_fullStr Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_short Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty
title_sort intraocular pressure measurement after penetrating keratoplasty
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204325
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020234
work_keys_str_mv AT dumitrescuotiliamaria intraocularpressuremeasurementafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT istratesinziana intraocularpressuremeasurementafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT macoveimioaralaura intraocularpressuremeasurementafterpenetratingkeratoplasty
AT gheorghealinagabriela intraocularpressuremeasurementafterpenetratingkeratoplasty