Cargando…

Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas

The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is a new prognostic factor in lymphomas that could benefit from automation with deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN). Manual TMTV segmentations of 1218 baseline 18FDG-PET/CT have been used for training. A 3D V-NET model has been trained to generat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Revailler, Wendy, Cottereau, Anne Ségolène, Rossi, Cedric, Noyelle, Rudy, Trouillard, Thomas, Morschhauser, Franck, Casasnovas, Olivier, Thieblemont, Catherine, Le Gouill, Steven, André, Marc, Ghesquieres, Herve, Ricci, Romain, Meignan, Michel, Kanoun, Salim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020417
_version_ 1784656845817774080
author Revailler, Wendy
Cottereau, Anne Ségolène
Rossi, Cedric
Noyelle, Rudy
Trouillard, Thomas
Morschhauser, Franck
Casasnovas, Olivier
Thieblemont, Catherine
Le Gouill, Steven
André, Marc
Ghesquieres, Herve
Ricci, Romain
Meignan, Michel
Kanoun, Salim
author_facet Revailler, Wendy
Cottereau, Anne Ségolène
Rossi, Cedric
Noyelle, Rudy
Trouillard, Thomas
Morschhauser, Franck
Casasnovas, Olivier
Thieblemont, Catherine
Le Gouill, Steven
André, Marc
Ghesquieres, Herve
Ricci, Romain
Meignan, Michel
Kanoun, Salim
author_sort Revailler, Wendy
collection PubMed
description The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is a new prognostic factor in lymphomas that could benefit from automation with deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN). Manual TMTV segmentations of 1218 baseline 18FDG-PET/CT have been used for training. A 3D V-NET model has been trained to generate segmentations with soft dice loss. Ground truth segmentation has been generated using a combination of different thresholds (TMTVprob), applied to the manual region of interest (Otsu, relative 41% and SUV 2.5 and 4 cutoffs). In total, 407 and 405 PET/CT were used for test and validation datasets, respectively. The training was completed in 93 h. In comparison with the TMTVprob, mean dice reached 0.84 in the training set, 0.84 in the validation set and 0.76 in the test set. The median dice scores for each TMTV methodology were 0.77, 0.70 and 0.90 for 41%, 2.5 and 4 cutoff, respectively. Differences in the median TMTV between manual and predicted TMTV were 32, 147 and 5 mL. Spearman’s correlations between manual and predicted TMTV were 0.92, 0.95 and 0.98. This generic deep learning model to compute TMTV in lymphomas can drastically reduce computation time of TMTV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88708092022-02-25 Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas Revailler, Wendy Cottereau, Anne Ségolène Rossi, Cedric Noyelle, Rudy Trouillard, Thomas Morschhauser, Franck Casasnovas, Olivier Thieblemont, Catherine Le Gouill, Steven André, Marc Ghesquieres, Herve Ricci, Romain Meignan, Michel Kanoun, Salim Diagnostics (Basel) Article The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is a new prognostic factor in lymphomas that could benefit from automation with deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN). Manual TMTV segmentations of 1218 baseline 18FDG-PET/CT have been used for training. A 3D V-NET model has been trained to generate segmentations with soft dice loss. Ground truth segmentation has been generated using a combination of different thresholds (TMTVprob), applied to the manual region of interest (Otsu, relative 41% and SUV 2.5 and 4 cutoffs). In total, 407 and 405 PET/CT were used for test and validation datasets, respectively. The training was completed in 93 h. In comparison with the TMTVprob, mean dice reached 0.84 in the training set, 0.84 in the validation set and 0.76 in the test set. The median dice scores for each TMTV methodology were 0.77, 0.70 and 0.90 for 41%, 2.5 and 4 cutoff, respectively. Differences in the median TMTV between manual and predicted TMTV were 32, 147 and 5 mL. Spearman’s correlations between manual and predicted TMTV were 0.92, 0.95 and 0.98. This generic deep learning model to compute TMTV in lymphomas can drastically reduce computation time of TMTV. MDPI 2022-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8870809/ /pubmed/35204515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020417 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Revailler, Wendy
Cottereau, Anne Ségolène
Rossi, Cedric
Noyelle, Rudy
Trouillard, Thomas
Morschhauser, Franck
Casasnovas, Olivier
Thieblemont, Catherine
Le Gouill, Steven
André, Marc
Ghesquieres, Herve
Ricci, Romain
Meignan, Michel
Kanoun, Salim
Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas
title Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas
title_full Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas
title_fullStr Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas
title_full_unstemmed Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas
title_short Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas
title_sort deep learning approach to automatize tmtv calculations regardless of segmentation methodology for major fdg-avid lymphomas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204515
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020417
work_keys_str_mv AT revaillerwendy deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT cottereauannesegolene deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT rossicedric deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT noyellerudy deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT trouillardthomas deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT morschhauserfranck deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT casasnovasolivier deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT thieblemontcatherine deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT legouillsteven deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT andremarc deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT ghesquieresherve deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT ricciromain deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT meignanmichel deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas
AT kanounsalim deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas