Cargando…
Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas
The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is a new prognostic factor in lymphomas that could benefit from automation with deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN). Manual TMTV segmentations of 1218 baseline 18FDG-PET/CT have been used for training. A 3D V-NET model has been trained to generat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020417 |
_version_ | 1784656845817774080 |
---|---|
author | Revailler, Wendy Cottereau, Anne Ségolène Rossi, Cedric Noyelle, Rudy Trouillard, Thomas Morschhauser, Franck Casasnovas, Olivier Thieblemont, Catherine Le Gouill, Steven André, Marc Ghesquieres, Herve Ricci, Romain Meignan, Michel Kanoun, Salim |
author_facet | Revailler, Wendy Cottereau, Anne Ségolène Rossi, Cedric Noyelle, Rudy Trouillard, Thomas Morschhauser, Franck Casasnovas, Olivier Thieblemont, Catherine Le Gouill, Steven André, Marc Ghesquieres, Herve Ricci, Romain Meignan, Michel Kanoun, Salim |
author_sort | Revailler, Wendy |
collection | PubMed |
description | The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is a new prognostic factor in lymphomas that could benefit from automation with deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN). Manual TMTV segmentations of 1218 baseline 18FDG-PET/CT have been used for training. A 3D V-NET model has been trained to generate segmentations with soft dice loss. Ground truth segmentation has been generated using a combination of different thresholds (TMTVprob), applied to the manual region of interest (Otsu, relative 41% and SUV 2.5 and 4 cutoffs). In total, 407 and 405 PET/CT were used for test and validation datasets, respectively. The training was completed in 93 h. In comparison with the TMTVprob, mean dice reached 0.84 in the training set, 0.84 in the validation set and 0.76 in the test set. The median dice scores for each TMTV methodology were 0.77, 0.70 and 0.90 for 41%, 2.5 and 4 cutoff, respectively. Differences in the median TMTV between manual and predicted TMTV were 32, 147 and 5 mL. Spearman’s correlations between manual and predicted TMTV were 0.92, 0.95 and 0.98. This generic deep learning model to compute TMTV in lymphomas can drastically reduce computation time of TMTV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88708092022-02-25 Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas Revailler, Wendy Cottereau, Anne Ségolène Rossi, Cedric Noyelle, Rudy Trouillard, Thomas Morschhauser, Franck Casasnovas, Olivier Thieblemont, Catherine Le Gouill, Steven André, Marc Ghesquieres, Herve Ricci, Romain Meignan, Michel Kanoun, Salim Diagnostics (Basel) Article The total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) is a new prognostic factor in lymphomas that could benefit from automation with deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN). Manual TMTV segmentations of 1218 baseline 18FDG-PET/CT have been used for training. A 3D V-NET model has been trained to generate segmentations with soft dice loss. Ground truth segmentation has been generated using a combination of different thresholds (TMTVprob), applied to the manual region of interest (Otsu, relative 41% and SUV 2.5 and 4 cutoffs). In total, 407 and 405 PET/CT were used for test and validation datasets, respectively. The training was completed in 93 h. In comparison with the TMTVprob, mean dice reached 0.84 in the training set, 0.84 in the validation set and 0.76 in the test set. The median dice scores for each TMTV methodology were 0.77, 0.70 and 0.90 for 41%, 2.5 and 4 cutoff, respectively. Differences in the median TMTV between manual and predicted TMTV were 32, 147 and 5 mL. Spearman’s correlations between manual and predicted TMTV were 0.92, 0.95 and 0.98. This generic deep learning model to compute TMTV in lymphomas can drastically reduce computation time of TMTV. MDPI 2022-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8870809/ /pubmed/35204515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020417 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Revailler, Wendy Cottereau, Anne Ségolène Rossi, Cedric Noyelle, Rudy Trouillard, Thomas Morschhauser, Franck Casasnovas, Olivier Thieblemont, Catherine Le Gouill, Steven André, Marc Ghesquieres, Herve Ricci, Romain Meignan, Michel Kanoun, Salim Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas |
title | Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas |
title_full | Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas |
title_fullStr | Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas |
title_short | Deep Learning Approach to Automatize TMTV Calculations Regardless of Segmentation Methodology for Major FDG-Avid Lymphomas |
title_sort | deep learning approach to automatize tmtv calculations regardless of segmentation methodology for major fdg-avid lymphomas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204515 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT revaillerwendy deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT cottereauannesegolene deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT rossicedric deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT noyellerudy deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT trouillardthomas deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT morschhauserfranck deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT casasnovasolivier deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT thieblemontcatherine deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT legouillsteven deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT andremarc deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT ghesquieresherve deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT ricciromain deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT meignanmichel deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas AT kanounsalim deeplearningapproachtoautomatizetmtvcalculationsregardlessofsegmentationmethodologyformajorfdgavidlymphomas |