Cargando…
Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology in different benign and malignant mesenteric masses (MMs). Methods: A total of 69 patients with MMs diagnosed from September 2018 to November 20...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020523 |
_version_ | 1784656854614278144 |
---|---|
author | Alhyari, Amjad Görg, Christian Dietrich, Christoph Frank Kawohl, Svenja Safai Zadeh, Ehsan |
author_facet | Alhyari, Amjad Görg, Christian Dietrich, Christoph Frank Kawohl, Svenja Safai Zadeh, Ehsan |
author_sort | Alhyari, Amjad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology in different benign and malignant mesenteric masses (MMs). Methods: A total of 69 patients with MMs diagnosed from September 2018 to November 2021 were included retrospectively in the study. The inclusion criteria were (1) an MM over 1 cm; (2) valid ARFI measurements; and (3) confirmation of the diagnosis of an MM by histological examination and/or clinical and radiological follow-up. To examine the mean ARFI velocities (MAVs) for potential cut-off values between benign and malignant MMs, a receiver operating characteristics analysis was implemented. Results: In total, 37/69 of the MMs were benign (53.6%) and 32/69 malignant (46.4%). Benign MMs demonstrated significantly lower MAVs than mMMs (1.59 ± 0.93 vs. 2.76 ± 1.01 m/s; p < 0.001). Selecting 2.05 m/s as a cut-off value yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 75.0% and 70.3%, respectively, in diagnosing malignant MMs (area under the curve = 0.802, 95% confidence interval 0.699–0.904). Conclusion: ARFI elastography may represent an additional non-invasive tool for differentiating benign from malignant MMs. However, to validate the results of this study, further prospective randomized studies are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88708452022-02-25 Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study Alhyari, Amjad Görg, Christian Dietrich, Christoph Frank Kawohl, Svenja Safai Zadeh, Ehsan Diagnostics (Basel) Article Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology in different benign and malignant mesenteric masses (MMs). Methods: A total of 69 patients with MMs diagnosed from September 2018 to November 2021 were included retrospectively in the study. The inclusion criteria were (1) an MM over 1 cm; (2) valid ARFI measurements; and (3) confirmation of the diagnosis of an MM by histological examination and/or clinical and radiological follow-up. To examine the mean ARFI velocities (MAVs) for potential cut-off values between benign and malignant MMs, a receiver operating characteristics analysis was implemented. Results: In total, 37/69 of the MMs were benign (53.6%) and 32/69 malignant (46.4%). Benign MMs demonstrated significantly lower MAVs than mMMs (1.59 ± 0.93 vs. 2.76 ± 1.01 m/s; p < 0.001). Selecting 2.05 m/s as a cut-off value yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 75.0% and 70.3%, respectively, in diagnosing malignant MMs (area under the curve = 0.802, 95% confidence interval 0.699–0.904). Conclusion: ARFI elastography may represent an additional non-invasive tool for differentiating benign from malignant MMs. However, to validate the results of this study, further prospective randomized studies are required. MDPI 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8870845/ /pubmed/35204612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020523 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alhyari, Amjad Görg, Christian Dietrich, Christoph Frank Kawohl, Svenja Safai Zadeh, Ehsan Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study |
title | Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study |
title_full | Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study |
title_short | Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study |
title_sort | diagnostic performance of point shear wave elastography (pswe) using acoustic radiation force impulse (arfi) technology in mesenteric masses: a feasibility study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020523 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alhyariamjad diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy AT gorgchristian diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy AT dietrichchristophfrank diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy AT kawohlsvenja diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy AT safaizadehehsan diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy |