Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology in different benign and malignant mesenteric masses (MMs). Methods: A total of 69 patients with MMs diagnosed from September 2018 to November 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alhyari, Amjad, Görg, Christian, Dietrich, Christoph Frank, Kawohl, Svenja, Safai Zadeh, Ehsan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020523
_version_ 1784656854614278144
author Alhyari, Amjad
Görg, Christian
Dietrich, Christoph Frank
Kawohl, Svenja
Safai Zadeh, Ehsan
author_facet Alhyari, Amjad
Görg, Christian
Dietrich, Christoph Frank
Kawohl, Svenja
Safai Zadeh, Ehsan
author_sort Alhyari, Amjad
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology in different benign and malignant mesenteric masses (MMs). Methods: A total of 69 patients with MMs diagnosed from September 2018 to November 2021 were included retrospectively in the study. The inclusion criteria were (1) an MM over 1 cm; (2) valid ARFI measurements; and (3) confirmation of the diagnosis of an MM by histological examination and/or clinical and radiological follow-up. To examine the mean ARFI velocities (MAVs) for potential cut-off values between benign and malignant MMs, a receiver operating characteristics analysis was implemented. Results: In total, 37/69 of the MMs were benign (53.6%) and 32/69 malignant (46.4%). Benign MMs demonstrated significantly lower MAVs than mMMs (1.59 ± 0.93 vs. 2.76 ± 1.01 m/s; p < 0.001). Selecting 2.05 m/s as a cut-off value yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 75.0% and 70.3%, respectively, in diagnosing malignant MMs (area under the curve = 0.802, 95% confidence interval 0.699–0.904). Conclusion: ARFI elastography may represent an additional non-invasive tool for differentiating benign from malignant MMs. However, to validate the results of this study, further prospective randomized studies are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88708452022-02-25 Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study Alhyari, Amjad Görg, Christian Dietrich, Christoph Frank Kawohl, Svenja Safai Zadeh, Ehsan Diagnostics (Basel) Article Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound point shear wave elastography (pSWE) using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology in different benign and malignant mesenteric masses (MMs). Methods: A total of 69 patients with MMs diagnosed from September 2018 to November 2021 were included retrospectively in the study. The inclusion criteria were (1) an MM over 1 cm; (2) valid ARFI measurements; and (3) confirmation of the diagnosis of an MM by histological examination and/or clinical and radiological follow-up. To examine the mean ARFI velocities (MAVs) for potential cut-off values between benign and malignant MMs, a receiver operating characteristics analysis was implemented. Results: In total, 37/69 of the MMs were benign (53.6%) and 32/69 malignant (46.4%). Benign MMs demonstrated significantly lower MAVs than mMMs (1.59 ± 0.93 vs. 2.76 ± 1.01 m/s; p < 0.001). Selecting 2.05 m/s as a cut-off value yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 75.0% and 70.3%, respectively, in diagnosing malignant MMs (area under the curve = 0.802, 95% confidence interval 0.699–0.904). Conclusion: ARFI elastography may represent an additional non-invasive tool for differentiating benign from malignant MMs. However, to validate the results of this study, further prospective randomized studies are required. MDPI 2022-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8870845/ /pubmed/35204612 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020523 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Alhyari, Amjad
Görg, Christian
Dietrich, Christoph Frank
Kawohl, Svenja
Safai Zadeh, Ehsan
Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study
title Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study
title_full Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study
title_short Diagnostic Performance of Point Shear Wave Elastography (pSWE) Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI) Technology in Mesenteric Masses: A Feasibility Study
title_sort diagnostic performance of point shear wave elastography (pswe) using acoustic radiation force impulse (arfi) technology in mesenteric masses: a feasibility study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204612
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020523
work_keys_str_mv AT alhyariamjad diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy
AT gorgchristian diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy
AT dietrichchristophfrank diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy
AT kawohlsvenja diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy
AT safaizadehehsan diagnosticperformanceofpointshearwaveelastographypsweusingacousticradiationforceimpulsearfitechnologyinmesentericmassesafeasibilitystudy