Cargando…

Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models

The Canadian system for approval of new cancer drugs is complex with multiple steps. Health Canada grants a license for a drug to be marketed and prescribed. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) and Institut national d’excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS) make...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glennie, Judith, Villalba, Eva, Wheatley-Price, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020083
_version_ 1784656867591454720
author Glennie, Judith
Villalba, Eva
Wheatley-Price, Paul
author_facet Glennie, Judith
Villalba, Eva
Wheatley-Price, Paul
author_sort Glennie, Judith
collection PubMed
description The Canadian system for approval of new cancer drugs is complex with multiple steps. Health Canada grants a license for a drug to be marketed and prescribed. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) and Institut national d’excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS) make recommendations by way of health technology assessments (HTA). If positive, the latter then lead to confidential price negotiations at the pan-Canadian pharmaceutical alliance (pCPA), after which individual provinces and territories make a listing decision. Delays can occur at each stage, but post-HTA delays can be lengthy and unpredictable, denying or impeding access to an effective drug with the potential for devastating clinical outcomes. Conditional funding models have been adopted in a number of European countries with the goal of providing timely access to new medications in areas of unmet need, in advance of further steps in the reimbursement process. This manuscript discusses different stakeholder perspectives on conditional funding agreements—including a recent successful example of such a process in the UK—based on a panel discussion at the 2021 Canadian Association of Population Therapeutics (CAPT) Conference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88708992022-02-25 Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models Glennie, Judith Villalba, Eva Wheatley-Price, Paul Curr Oncol Opinion The Canadian system for approval of new cancer drugs is complex with multiple steps. Health Canada grants a license for a drug to be marketed and prescribed. The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) and Institut national d’excellence en santé et services sociaux (INESSS) make recommendations by way of health technology assessments (HTA). If positive, the latter then lead to confidential price negotiations at the pan-Canadian pharmaceutical alliance (pCPA), after which individual provinces and territories make a listing decision. Delays can occur at each stage, but post-HTA delays can be lengthy and unpredictable, denying or impeding access to an effective drug with the potential for devastating clinical outcomes. Conditional funding models have been adopted in a number of European countries with the goal of providing timely access to new medications in areas of unmet need, in advance of further steps in the reimbursement process. This manuscript discusses different stakeholder perspectives on conditional funding agreements—including a recent successful example of such a process in the UK—based on a panel discussion at the 2021 Canadian Association of Population Therapeutics (CAPT) Conference. MDPI 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8870899/ /pubmed/35200582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020083 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Opinion
Glennie, Judith
Villalba, Eva
Wheatley-Price, Paul
Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models
title Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models
title_full Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models
title_fullStr Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models
title_full_unstemmed Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models
title_short Closing the Gaps to Timely Patient Access: Perspectives on Conditional Funding Models
title_sort closing the gaps to timely patient access: perspectives on conditional funding models
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020083
work_keys_str_mv AT glenniejudith closingthegapstotimelypatientaccessperspectivesonconditionalfundingmodels
AT villalbaeva closingthegapstotimelypatientaccessperspectivesonconditionalfundingmodels
AT wheatleypricepaul closingthegapstotimelypatientaccessperspectivesonconditionalfundingmodels