Cargando…
Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
We performed a meta-analysis of published data to investigate the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence for pancreatic cancer. Systematic research was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies up to October 2021. We extracted or calcu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020309 |
_version_ | 1784656871673561088 |
---|---|
author | Dumitrescu, Elena Adriana Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Cazacu, Irina M. Florescu, Lucian Mihai Streba, Liliana Croitoru, Vlad M. Sur, Daniel Croitoru, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Lungulescu, Cristian Virgil |
author_facet | Dumitrescu, Elena Adriana Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Cazacu, Irina M. Florescu, Lucian Mihai Streba, Liliana Croitoru, Vlad M. Sur, Daniel Croitoru, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Lungulescu, Cristian Virgil |
author_sort | Dumitrescu, Elena Adriana |
collection | PubMed |
description | We performed a meta-analysis of published data to investigate the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence for pancreatic cancer. Systematic research was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies up to October 2021. We extracted or calculated the number of true positives, false positives true negatives, and false negatives from the selected publications. In total, 10 studies, featuring 1871 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. R and RevMan 5.4.1 software were used for calculations and statistical analysis. The studies included in the meta-analysis did not show an overall heterogeneity (I(2) = 0%), and no significant differences were found from the subgroup analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.95) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.95, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 128.9 (95% CI, 71.2–233.8), indicating very good diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pancreatic cancer. Based on these promising preliminary results and further testing on a larger dataset, artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound could become an important tool for the computer-aided diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870917 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88709172022-02-25 Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Dumitrescu, Elena Adriana Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Cazacu, Irina M. Florescu, Lucian Mihai Streba, Liliana Croitoru, Vlad M. Sur, Daniel Croitoru, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Lungulescu, Cristian Virgil Diagnostics (Basel) Review We performed a meta-analysis of published data to investigate the diagnostic value of artificial intelligence for pancreatic cancer. Systematic research was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies up to October 2021. We extracted or calculated the number of true positives, false positives true negatives, and false negatives from the selected publications. In total, 10 studies, featuring 1871 patients, met our inclusion criteria. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. R and RevMan 5.4.1 software were used for calculations and statistical analysis. The studies included in the meta-analysis did not show an overall heterogeneity (I(2) = 0%), and no significant differences were found from the subgroup analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.95) and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.95, and the diagnostic odds ratio was 128.9 (95% CI, 71.2–233.8), indicating very good diagnostic accuracy for the detection of pancreatic cancer. Based on these promising preliminary results and further testing on a larger dataset, artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound could become an important tool for the computer-aided diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. MDPI 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8870917/ /pubmed/35204400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020309 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Dumitrescu, Elena Adriana Ungureanu, Bogdan Silviu Cazacu, Irina M. Florescu, Lucian Mihai Streba, Liliana Croitoru, Vlad M. Sur, Daniel Croitoru, Adina Turcu-Stiolica, Adina Lungulescu, Cristian Virgil Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870917/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204400 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020309 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dumitrescuelenaadriana diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ungureanubogdansilviu diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cazacuirinam diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT floresculucianmihai diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT strebaliliana diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT croitoruvladm diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT surdaniel diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT croitoruadina diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT turcustiolicaadina diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lungulescucristianvirgil diagnosticvalueofartificialintelligenceassistedendoscopicultrasoundforpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |