Cargando…
Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand
New drugs are expensive, in part due to excessive drug development costs. Governments are trying to reduce drug prices. This can delay access to effective agents. A country’s access to new drugs correlates with prices they agree to pay. After Health Canada approves a drug, the Canadian Agency for Dr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200599 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020100 |
_version_ | 1784656878434779136 |
---|---|
author | Stewart, David J. Bradford, John-Peter Batist, Gerald |
author_facet | Stewart, David J. Bradford, John-Peter Batist, Gerald |
author_sort | Stewart, David J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | New drugs are expensive, in part due to excessive drug development costs. Governments are trying to reduce drug prices. This can delay access to effective agents. A country’s access to new drugs correlates with prices they agree to pay. After Health Canada approves a drug, the Canadian Agency for Drug and Technologies in Health (CADTH) assesses it. CADTH’s approval is usually contingent on it costing ≤CAD 50,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. This value (unchanged from the 1970s) is inappropriately low. An inflation-adjusted CAD 50,000 1975 QALY should translate into a CAD 250,000 2021 QALY. CADTH’s target also does not consider that drug development costs have risen much faster than inflation or that new precision therapies may only be used in small populations. In a separate process, proposals from the Patented Medicines Price Review Board (PMPRB) would decrease initial Canadian drug prices by 20%, but prices would fall further as sales increased, with ultimate price reductions of up to 80%. PMPRB claims its proposal would not reduce drug access, but multiple analyses strongly suggest otherwise. Government price controls target the symptom (high prices), not the disease. They translate into shortages without solving the problem. CADTH and PMPRB approaches both threaten access to effective drugs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88709452022-02-25 Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand Stewart, David J. Bradford, John-Peter Batist, Gerald Curr Oncol Commentary New drugs are expensive, in part due to excessive drug development costs. Governments are trying to reduce drug prices. This can delay access to effective agents. A country’s access to new drugs correlates with prices they agree to pay. After Health Canada approves a drug, the Canadian Agency for Drug and Technologies in Health (CADTH) assesses it. CADTH’s approval is usually contingent on it costing ≤CAD 50,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. This value (unchanged from the 1970s) is inappropriately low. An inflation-adjusted CAD 50,000 1975 QALY should translate into a CAD 250,000 2021 QALY. CADTH’s target also does not consider that drug development costs have risen much faster than inflation or that new precision therapies may only be used in small populations. In a separate process, proposals from the Patented Medicines Price Review Board (PMPRB) would decrease initial Canadian drug prices by 20%, but prices would fall further as sales increased, with ultimate price reductions of up to 80%. PMPRB claims its proposal would not reduce drug access, but multiple analyses strongly suggest otherwise. Government price controls target the symptom (high prices), not the disease. They translate into shortages without solving the problem. CADTH and PMPRB approaches both threaten access to effective drugs. MDPI 2022-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8870945/ /pubmed/35200599 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020100 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Commentary Stewart, David J. Bradford, John-Peter Batist, Gerald Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand |
title | Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand |
title_full | Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand |
title_fullStr | Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand |
title_short | Treatment Access, Health Economics, and the Wave of a Magic Wand |
title_sort | treatment access, health economics, and the wave of a magic wand |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200599 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stewartdavidj treatmentaccesshealtheconomicsandthewaveofamagicwand AT bradfordjohnpeter treatmentaccesshealtheconomicsandthewaveofamagicwand AT batistgerald treatmentaccesshealtheconomicsandthewaveofamagicwand |