Cargando…
Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial Efficacies and Mechanisms of Different Tea Extracts
Tea is a popular beverage known for its unique taste and vast health benefits. The main components in tea change greatly during different processing methods, which makes teas capable of having different biological activities. We compared the antibacterial activity of four varieties of tea, including...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11040620 |
_version_ | 1784656883077873664 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Shuyuan Zhang, Qiqi Li, Hang Qiu, Zheyu Yu, Youben |
author_facet | Liu, Shuyuan Zhang, Qiqi Li, Hang Qiu, Zheyu Yu, Youben |
author_sort | Liu, Shuyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tea is a popular beverage known for its unique taste and vast health benefits. The main components in tea change greatly during different processing methods, which makes teas capable of having different biological activities. We compared the antibacterial activity of four varieties of tea, including green, oolong, black, and Fuzhuan tea. All tea extracts showed antibacterial activity and Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus) were more susceptible to tea extracts than Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium). Green tea extracts inhibited bacterial pathogens much more effectively in all four varieties of tea with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values at 20 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, 35 mg/mL, and 16 mg/mL for E. faecalis, S. aureus, E. coli, and S. typhimurium, respectively. Catechins should be considered as the main antibiotic components of the four tea extracts. Total catechins were extracted from green tea and evaluated their antibacterial activity. Additional studies showed that the catechins damaged the cell membrane and increased cell membrane permeability, leading to changes in the relative electrical conductivity and the release of certain components into the cytoplasm. Tea extracts, especially green tea extracts, should be considered as safe antibacterial food additives. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8870964 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88709642022-02-25 Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial Efficacies and Mechanisms of Different Tea Extracts Liu, Shuyuan Zhang, Qiqi Li, Hang Qiu, Zheyu Yu, Youben Foods Article Tea is a popular beverage known for its unique taste and vast health benefits. The main components in tea change greatly during different processing methods, which makes teas capable of having different biological activities. We compared the antibacterial activity of four varieties of tea, including green, oolong, black, and Fuzhuan tea. All tea extracts showed antibacterial activity and Gram-positive bacteria (Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus) were more susceptible to tea extracts than Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium). Green tea extracts inhibited bacterial pathogens much more effectively in all four varieties of tea with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values at 20 mg/mL, 10 mg/mL, 35 mg/mL, and 16 mg/mL for E. faecalis, S. aureus, E. coli, and S. typhimurium, respectively. Catechins should be considered as the main antibiotic components of the four tea extracts. Total catechins were extracted from green tea and evaluated their antibacterial activity. Additional studies showed that the catechins damaged the cell membrane and increased cell membrane permeability, leading to changes in the relative electrical conductivity and the release of certain components into the cytoplasm. Tea extracts, especially green tea extracts, should be considered as safe antibacterial food additives. MDPI 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8870964/ /pubmed/35206096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11040620 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Shuyuan Zhang, Qiqi Li, Hang Qiu, Zheyu Yu, Youben Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial Efficacies and Mechanisms of Different Tea Extracts |
title | Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial Efficacies and Mechanisms of Different Tea Extracts |
title_full | Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial Efficacies and Mechanisms of Different Tea Extracts |
title_fullStr | Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial Efficacies and Mechanisms of Different Tea Extracts |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial Efficacies and Mechanisms of Different Tea Extracts |
title_short | Comparative Assessment of the Antibacterial Efficacies and Mechanisms of Different Tea Extracts |
title_sort | comparative assessment of the antibacterial efficacies and mechanisms of different tea extracts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods11040620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liushuyuan comparativeassessmentoftheantibacterialefficaciesandmechanismsofdifferentteaextracts AT zhangqiqi comparativeassessmentoftheantibacterialefficaciesandmechanismsofdifferentteaextracts AT lihang comparativeassessmentoftheantibacterialefficaciesandmechanismsofdifferentteaextracts AT qiuzheyu comparativeassessmentoftheantibacterialefficaciesandmechanismsofdifferentteaextracts AT yuyouben comparativeassessmentoftheantibacterialefficaciesandmechanismsofdifferentteaextracts |