Cargando…

Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review

This study examined the success rates of single immediate implants and their associated biological, hardware and aesthetic complications. Using a developed search strategy, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on single-unit immediate implants with at least six human participants, a minimum follow-up...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thanissorn, Charn, Guo, Jason, Jing Ying Chan, Dianna, Koyi, Bryar, Kujan, Omar, Khzam, Nabil, Miranda, Leticia Algarves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10020031
_version_ 1784656886974382080
author Thanissorn, Charn
Guo, Jason
Jing Ying Chan, Dianna
Koyi, Bryar
Kujan, Omar
Khzam, Nabil
Miranda, Leticia Algarves
author_facet Thanissorn, Charn
Guo, Jason
Jing Ying Chan, Dianna
Koyi, Bryar
Kujan, Omar
Khzam, Nabil
Miranda, Leticia Algarves
author_sort Thanissorn, Charn
collection PubMed
description This study examined the success rates of single immediate implants and their associated biological, hardware and aesthetic complications. Using a developed search strategy, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on single-unit immediate implants with at least six human participants, a minimum follow-up time of 12 months and published between January 1999 and January 2021 were identified. Data was extracted independently using pre-designed data extraction forms. Information on success rates and associated biological, hardware and aesthetic complications were obtained and assessed. Out of 191 potentially eligible studies, 26 RCTs assessing 1270 patients with a total of 1326 single implants were included and further evaluated. In this review, success rate was reported to be 96.7–100% over a total of 9 studies. However, there was a lack of consensus on a universal success criterion between authors emphasizing the need for agreement. The average follow up was 29 months and most reported complications were aesthetic (63 cases, 4.7%), whilst there were relatively fewer biological, (20 cases, 1.5%), and hardware complications (24 cases, 1.8%). Success rate is an uncommon clinical outcome with 9 out of 26 of the selected RCTs reporting it. In these studies, single immediate implants showed a high success rate with low numbers of biological and hardware complications, and high patient satisfaction with aesthetics were reported in the short-term follow-up of one year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8870981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88709812022-02-25 Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review Thanissorn, Charn Guo, Jason Jing Ying Chan, Dianna Koyi, Bryar Kujan, Omar Khzam, Nabil Miranda, Leticia Algarves Dent J (Basel) Systematic Review This study examined the success rates of single immediate implants and their associated biological, hardware and aesthetic complications. Using a developed search strategy, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on single-unit immediate implants with at least six human participants, a minimum follow-up time of 12 months and published between January 1999 and January 2021 were identified. Data was extracted independently using pre-designed data extraction forms. Information on success rates and associated biological, hardware and aesthetic complications were obtained and assessed. Out of 191 potentially eligible studies, 26 RCTs assessing 1270 patients with a total of 1326 single implants were included and further evaluated. In this review, success rate was reported to be 96.7–100% over a total of 9 studies. However, there was a lack of consensus on a universal success criterion between authors emphasizing the need for agreement. The average follow up was 29 months and most reported complications were aesthetic (63 cases, 4.7%), whilst there were relatively fewer biological, (20 cases, 1.5%), and hardware complications (24 cases, 1.8%). Success rate is an uncommon clinical outcome with 9 out of 26 of the selected RCTs reporting it. In these studies, single immediate implants showed a high success rate with low numbers of biological and hardware complications, and high patient satisfaction with aesthetics were reported in the short-term follow-up of one year. MDPI 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8870981/ /pubmed/35200256 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10020031 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Thanissorn, Charn
Guo, Jason
Jing Ying Chan, Dianna
Koyi, Bryar
Kujan, Omar
Khzam, Nabil
Miranda, Leticia Algarves
Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review
title Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review
title_full Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review
title_short Success Rates and Complications Associated with Single Immediate Implants: A Systematic Review
title_sort success rates and complications associated with single immediate implants: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8870981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35200256
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10020031
work_keys_str_mv AT thanissorncharn successratesandcomplicationsassociatedwithsingleimmediateimplantsasystematicreview
AT guojason successratesandcomplicationsassociatedwithsingleimmediateimplantsasystematicreview
AT jingyingchandianna successratesandcomplicationsassociatedwithsingleimmediateimplantsasystematicreview
AT koyibryar successratesandcomplicationsassociatedwithsingleimmediateimplantsasystematicreview
AT kujanomar successratesandcomplicationsassociatedwithsingleimmediateimplantsasystematicreview
AT khzamnabil successratesandcomplicationsassociatedwithsingleimmediateimplantsasystematicreview
AT mirandaleticiaalgarves successratesandcomplicationsassociatedwithsingleimmediateimplantsasystematicreview