Cargando…

Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation

Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology—both imaging hardware and reconstruction software—into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rogasch, Julian M. M., Hofheinz, Frank, van Heek, Lutz, Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus, Boellaard, Ronald, Kobe, Carsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204542
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020451
_version_ 1784656905988210688
author Rogasch, Julian M. M.
Hofheinz, Frank
van Heek, Lutz
Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus
Boellaard, Ronald
Kobe, Carsten
author_facet Rogasch, Julian M. M.
Hofheinz, Frank
van Heek, Lutz
Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus
Boellaard, Ronald
Kobe, Carsten
author_sort Rogasch, Julian M. M.
collection PubMed
description Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology—both imaging hardware and reconstruction software—into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transition period in which traditional and new technologies coexist. The effects on the clinical value of PET imaging and its interpretation in routine clinical practice require careful reevaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of important factors influencing quantification and interpretation with a focus on recent developments in PET technology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between quantitative accuracy and subjective image interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8871060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88710602022-02-25 Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation Rogasch, Julian M. M. Hofheinz, Frank van Heek, Lutz Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus Boellaard, Ronald Kobe, Carsten Diagnostics (Basel) Review Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology—both imaging hardware and reconstruction software—into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transition period in which traditional and new technologies coexist. The effects on the clinical value of PET imaging and its interpretation in routine clinical practice require careful reevaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of important factors influencing quantification and interpretation with a focus on recent developments in PET technology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between quantitative accuracy and subjective image interpretation. MDPI 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8871060/ /pubmed/35204542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020451 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Rogasch, Julian M. M.
Hofheinz, Frank
van Heek, Lutz
Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus
Boellaard, Ronald
Kobe, Carsten
Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
title Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
title_full Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
title_fullStr Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
title_short Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
title_sort influences on pet quantification and interpretation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204542
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020451
work_keys_str_mv AT rogaschjulianmm influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation
AT hofheinzfrank influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation
AT vanheeklutz influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation
AT voltinconradamadeus influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation
AT boellaardronald influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation
AT kobecarsten influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation