Cargando…
Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology—both imaging hardware and reconstruction software—into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020451 |
_version_ | 1784656905988210688 |
---|---|
author | Rogasch, Julian M. M. Hofheinz, Frank van Heek, Lutz Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus Boellaard, Ronald Kobe, Carsten |
author_facet | Rogasch, Julian M. M. Hofheinz, Frank van Heek, Lutz Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus Boellaard, Ronald Kobe, Carsten |
author_sort | Rogasch, Julian M. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology—both imaging hardware and reconstruction software—into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transition period in which traditional and new technologies coexist. The effects on the clinical value of PET imaging and its interpretation in routine clinical practice require careful reevaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of important factors influencing quantification and interpretation with a focus on recent developments in PET technology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between quantitative accuracy and subjective image interpretation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8871060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88710602022-02-25 Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation Rogasch, Julian M. M. Hofheinz, Frank van Heek, Lutz Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus Boellaard, Ronald Kobe, Carsten Diagnostics (Basel) Review Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology—both imaging hardware and reconstruction software—into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transition period in which traditional and new technologies coexist. The effects on the clinical value of PET imaging and its interpretation in routine clinical practice require careful reevaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of important factors influencing quantification and interpretation with a focus on recent developments in PET technology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between quantitative accuracy and subjective image interpretation. MDPI 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8871060/ /pubmed/35204542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020451 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Rogasch, Julian M. M. Hofheinz, Frank van Heek, Lutz Voltin, Conrad-Amadeus Boellaard, Ronald Kobe, Carsten Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation |
title | Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation |
title_full | Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation |
title_fullStr | Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed | Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation |
title_short | Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation |
title_sort | influences on pet quantification and interpretation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rogaschjulianmm influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation AT hofheinzfrank influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation AT vanheeklutz influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation AT voltinconradamadeus influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation AT boellaardronald influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation AT kobecarsten influencesonpetquantificationandinterpretation |