Cargando…

Clinical Significance of BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28 and CD80 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer

It is very important to find new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. A total of 79 patients were enrolled in the study. The study group consisted of 37 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, and the control group consisted of 42 patients with benign ovarian lesions. Five proteins involved in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Świderska, Janina, Kozłowski, Mateusz, Gaur, Maria, Pius-Sadowska, Ewa, Kwiatkowski, Sebastian, Machaliński, Bogusław, Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204342
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020251
_version_ 1784656911372648448
author Świderska, Janina
Kozłowski, Mateusz
Gaur, Maria
Pius-Sadowska, Ewa
Kwiatkowski, Sebastian
Machaliński, Bogusław
Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta
author_facet Świderska, Janina
Kozłowski, Mateusz
Gaur, Maria
Pius-Sadowska, Ewa
Kwiatkowski, Sebastian
Machaliński, Bogusław
Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta
author_sort Świderska, Janina
collection PubMed
description It is very important to find new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. A total of 79 patients were enrolled in the study. The study group consisted of 37 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, and the control group consisted of 42 patients with benign ovarian lesions. Five proteins involved in the immune response were studied: BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28, CD80. The study material was serum and peritoneal fluid. The ROC curve was plotted, and the area under the curve was calculated to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of the studied parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed simultaneously using the Cox regression model. The cut-off level of CD27 was 120.6 pg/mL, with the sensitivity and specificity of 66 and 84% (p = 0.014). Unfavorable prognostic factors determined in serum were: CD27 (for PFS: HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.21–1.29, p = 0.047; for OS: HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15–1.22, p = 0.014). Unfavorable prognostic factors determined in peritoneal fluid were: BTLA (for OS: HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.25–1.31, p = 0.033). We conclude that CD27 should be considered as a potential biomarker in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. BTLA and CD27 are unfavorable prognostic factors for ovarian cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8871082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88710822022-02-25 Clinical Significance of BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28 and CD80 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer Świderska, Janina Kozłowski, Mateusz Gaur, Maria Pius-Sadowska, Ewa Kwiatkowski, Sebastian Machaliński, Bogusław Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta Diagnostics (Basel) Article It is very important to find new diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. A total of 79 patients were enrolled in the study. The study group consisted of 37 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, and the control group consisted of 42 patients with benign ovarian lesions. Five proteins involved in the immune response were studied: BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28, CD80. The study material was serum and peritoneal fluid. The ROC curve was plotted, and the area under the curve was calculated to characterize the sensitivity and specificity of the studied parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed simultaneously using the Cox regression model. The cut-off level of CD27 was 120.6 pg/mL, with the sensitivity and specificity of 66 and 84% (p = 0.014). Unfavorable prognostic factors determined in serum were: CD27 (for PFS: HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.21–1.29, p = 0.047; for OS: HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15–1.22, p = 0.014). Unfavorable prognostic factors determined in peritoneal fluid were: BTLA (for OS: HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.25–1.31, p = 0.033). We conclude that CD27 should be considered as a potential biomarker in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. BTLA and CD27 are unfavorable prognostic factors for ovarian cancer. MDPI 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8871082/ /pubmed/35204342 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020251 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Świderska, Janina
Kozłowski, Mateusz
Gaur, Maria
Pius-Sadowska, Ewa
Kwiatkowski, Sebastian
Machaliński, Bogusław
Cymbaluk-Płoska, Aneta
Clinical Significance of BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28 and CD80 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer
title Clinical Significance of BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28 and CD80 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer
title_full Clinical Significance of BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28 and CD80 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer
title_fullStr Clinical Significance of BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28 and CD80 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Significance of BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28 and CD80 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer
title_short Clinical Significance of BTLA, CD27, CD70, CD28 and CD80 as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers in Ovarian Cancer
title_sort clinical significance of btla, cd27, cd70, cd28 and cd80 as diagnostic and prognostic markers in ovarian cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204342
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020251
work_keys_str_mv AT swiderskajanina clinicalsignificanceofbtlacd27cd70cd28andcd80asdiagnosticandprognosticmarkersinovariancancer
AT kozłowskimateusz clinicalsignificanceofbtlacd27cd70cd28andcd80asdiagnosticandprognosticmarkersinovariancancer
AT gaurmaria clinicalsignificanceofbtlacd27cd70cd28andcd80asdiagnosticandprognosticmarkersinovariancancer
AT piussadowskaewa clinicalsignificanceofbtlacd27cd70cd28andcd80asdiagnosticandprognosticmarkersinovariancancer
AT kwiatkowskisebastian clinicalsignificanceofbtlacd27cd70cd28andcd80asdiagnosticandprognosticmarkersinovariancancer
AT machalinskibogusław clinicalsignificanceofbtlacd27cd70cd28andcd80asdiagnosticandprognosticmarkersinovariancancer
AT cymbalukpłoskaaneta clinicalsignificanceofbtlacd27cd70cd28andcd80asdiagnosticandprognosticmarkersinovariancancer