Cargando…

Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study

This study aimed to investigate which of the two frequently adopted perfusion models better describes the contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion signal in order to produce meaningful imaging markers with the goal of developing a machine-learning model that can classify perfusion curves as ben...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ioannidis, Georgios S., Goumenakis, Michalis, Stefanis, Ioannis, Karantanas, Apostolos, Marias, Kostas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020425
_version_ 1784657007621439488
author Ioannidis, Georgios S.
Goumenakis, Michalis
Stefanis, Ioannis
Karantanas, Apostolos
Marias, Kostas
author_facet Ioannidis, Georgios S.
Goumenakis, Michalis
Stefanis, Ioannis
Karantanas, Apostolos
Marias, Kostas
author_sort Ioannidis, Georgios S.
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to investigate which of the two frequently adopted perfusion models better describes the contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion signal in order to produce meaningful imaging markers with the goal of developing a machine-learning model that can classify perfusion curves as benign or malignant in breast cancer data. Twenty-five patients with high suspicion of breast cancer were analyzed with exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) and gamma variate functions (GVF). The adjusted R(2) metric was the criterion for assessing model performance. Various classifiers were trained on the quantified perfusion curves in order to classify the curves as benign or malignant on a voxel basis. Sensitivity, specificity, geometric mean, and AUROC were the validation metrics. The best quantification model was EMG with an adjusted R(2) of 0.60 ± 0.26 compared to 0.56 ± 0.25 for GVF. Logistic regression was the classifier with the highest performance (sensitivity, specificity, G(mean), and AUROC = 89.2 ± 10.7, 70.0 ± 18.5, 77.1 ± 8.6, and 91.0 ± 6.6, respectively). This classification method obtained similar results that are consistent with the current literature. Breast cancer patients can benefit from early detection and characterization prior to biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8871488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88714882022-02-25 Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study Ioannidis, Georgios S. Goumenakis, Michalis Stefanis, Ioannis Karantanas, Apostolos Marias, Kostas Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate which of the two frequently adopted perfusion models better describes the contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion signal in order to produce meaningful imaging markers with the goal of developing a machine-learning model that can classify perfusion curves as benign or malignant in breast cancer data. Twenty-five patients with high suspicion of breast cancer were analyzed with exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) and gamma variate functions (GVF). The adjusted R(2) metric was the criterion for assessing model performance. Various classifiers were trained on the quantified perfusion curves in order to classify the curves as benign or malignant on a voxel basis. Sensitivity, specificity, geometric mean, and AUROC were the validation metrics. The best quantification model was EMG with an adjusted R(2) of 0.60 ± 0.26 compared to 0.56 ± 0.25 for GVF. Logistic regression was the classifier with the highest performance (sensitivity, specificity, G(mean), and AUROC = 89.2 ± 10.7, 70.0 ± 18.5, 77.1 ± 8.6, and 91.0 ± 6.6, respectively). This classification method obtained similar results that are consistent with the current literature. Breast cancer patients can benefit from early detection and characterization prior to biopsy. MDPI 2022-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8871488/ /pubmed/35204514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020425 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ioannidis, Georgios S.
Goumenakis, Michalis
Stefanis, Ioannis
Karantanas, Apostolos
Marias, Kostas
Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study
title Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study
title_full Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study
title_fullStr Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study
title_full_unstemmed Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study
title_short Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study
title_sort quantification and classification of contrast enhanced ultrasound breast cancer data: a preliminary study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020425
work_keys_str_mv AT ioannidisgeorgioss quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy
AT goumenakismichalis quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy
AT stefanisioannis quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy
AT karantanasapostolos quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy
AT mariaskostas quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy