Cargando…
Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study
This study aimed to investigate which of the two frequently adopted perfusion models better describes the contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion signal in order to produce meaningful imaging markers with the goal of developing a machine-learning model that can classify perfusion curves as ben...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020425 |
_version_ | 1784657007621439488 |
---|---|
author | Ioannidis, Georgios S. Goumenakis, Michalis Stefanis, Ioannis Karantanas, Apostolos Marias, Kostas |
author_facet | Ioannidis, Georgios S. Goumenakis, Michalis Stefanis, Ioannis Karantanas, Apostolos Marias, Kostas |
author_sort | Ioannidis, Georgios S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to investigate which of the two frequently adopted perfusion models better describes the contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion signal in order to produce meaningful imaging markers with the goal of developing a machine-learning model that can classify perfusion curves as benign or malignant in breast cancer data. Twenty-five patients with high suspicion of breast cancer were analyzed with exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) and gamma variate functions (GVF). The adjusted R(2) metric was the criterion for assessing model performance. Various classifiers were trained on the quantified perfusion curves in order to classify the curves as benign or malignant on a voxel basis. Sensitivity, specificity, geometric mean, and AUROC were the validation metrics. The best quantification model was EMG with an adjusted R(2) of 0.60 ± 0.26 compared to 0.56 ± 0.25 for GVF. Logistic regression was the classifier with the highest performance (sensitivity, specificity, G(mean), and AUROC = 89.2 ± 10.7, 70.0 ± 18.5, 77.1 ± 8.6, and 91.0 ± 6.6, respectively). This classification method obtained similar results that are consistent with the current literature. Breast cancer patients can benefit from early detection and characterization prior to biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8871488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88714882022-02-25 Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study Ioannidis, Georgios S. Goumenakis, Michalis Stefanis, Ioannis Karantanas, Apostolos Marias, Kostas Diagnostics (Basel) Article This study aimed to investigate which of the two frequently adopted perfusion models better describes the contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion signal in order to produce meaningful imaging markers with the goal of developing a machine-learning model that can classify perfusion curves as benign or malignant in breast cancer data. Twenty-five patients with high suspicion of breast cancer were analyzed with exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) and gamma variate functions (GVF). The adjusted R(2) metric was the criterion for assessing model performance. Various classifiers were trained on the quantified perfusion curves in order to classify the curves as benign or malignant on a voxel basis. Sensitivity, specificity, geometric mean, and AUROC were the validation metrics. The best quantification model was EMG with an adjusted R(2) of 0.60 ± 0.26 compared to 0.56 ± 0.25 for GVF. Logistic regression was the classifier with the highest performance (sensitivity, specificity, G(mean), and AUROC = 89.2 ± 10.7, 70.0 ± 18.5, 77.1 ± 8.6, and 91.0 ± 6.6, respectively). This classification method obtained similar results that are consistent with the current literature. Breast cancer patients can benefit from early detection and characterization prior to biopsy. MDPI 2022-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8871488/ /pubmed/35204514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020425 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ioannidis, Georgios S. Goumenakis, Michalis Stefanis, Ioannis Karantanas, Apostolos Marias, Kostas Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study |
title | Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study |
title_full | Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study |
title_fullStr | Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study |
title_short | Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study |
title_sort | quantification and classification of contrast enhanced ultrasound breast cancer data: a preliminary study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ioannidisgeorgioss quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy AT goumenakismichalis quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy AT stefanisioannis quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy AT karantanasapostolos quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy AT mariaskostas quantificationandclassificationofcontrastenhancedultrasoundbreastcancerdataapreliminarystudy |