Cargando…
Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant
Dental sealants are an excellent means to prevent pits and fissure decay. Currently, there are multiple commercially available sealant materials. The purpose of this study was to assess the retention of glass carbomer fissure sealant and the incidence of secondary caries over a period of 24 months i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041966 |
_version_ | 1784657030680674304 |
---|---|
author | Beresescu, Liana Kovacs, Monika Vlasa, Alexandru Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela Benedek, Csilla Pop, Mihai Bungardean, Denisa Eșian, Daniela |
author_facet | Beresescu, Liana Kovacs, Monika Vlasa, Alexandru Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela Benedek, Csilla Pop, Mihai Bungardean, Denisa Eșian, Daniela |
author_sort | Beresescu, Liana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dental sealants are an excellent means to prevent pits and fissure decay. Currently, there are multiple commercially available sealant materials. The purpose of this study was to assess the retention of glass carbomer fissure sealant and the incidence of secondary caries over a period of 24 months in comparison with a resin-based sealant. Materials and Methods: We included 32 children in the study, with ages between six and eight years and an average age of 6.8 years old. For each child, we sealed four permanent molars (totaling 128 teeth). The study group was divided into sub-groups. Sub-group A was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with composite resin-based fissure sealant, Helioseal F™, and sub-group B was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with glass carbomer cement, GCP Glass Seal™. The sealants were assessed clinically at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Results: The 6-month follow-up evaluation showed no statistically significant differences between the two materials neither regarding sealant retention nor new carious lesions formation (p > 0.05). At the 12-month recall, 57 molars had good retention (89.06%) from sub-group A and 44 molars (68.75%) from sub-group B; there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0187) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. At the last recall after 2 years, sub-group A had a higher number of molars with perfect sealing (47–73.43%) and 8 molars (12.5%) with new caries lesions and sub-group B had 23 (35.93%) molars with perfect sealing and 15 molars (23.44%) with new caries lesions; there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. Conclusions: The glass carbomer retention is very inferior to the resin-based material. The glass carbomer sealant was effective in preventing new caries development, comparable with the conventional resin-based sealant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8871583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88715832022-02-25 Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant Beresescu, Liana Kovacs, Monika Vlasa, Alexandru Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela Benedek, Csilla Pop, Mihai Bungardean, Denisa Eșian, Daniela Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Dental sealants are an excellent means to prevent pits and fissure decay. Currently, there are multiple commercially available sealant materials. The purpose of this study was to assess the retention of glass carbomer fissure sealant and the incidence of secondary caries over a period of 24 months in comparison with a resin-based sealant. Materials and Methods: We included 32 children in the study, with ages between six and eight years and an average age of 6.8 years old. For each child, we sealed four permanent molars (totaling 128 teeth). The study group was divided into sub-groups. Sub-group A was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with composite resin-based fissure sealant, Helioseal F™, and sub-group B was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with glass carbomer cement, GCP Glass Seal™. The sealants were assessed clinically at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Results: The 6-month follow-up evaluation showed no statistically significant differences between the two materials neither regarding sealant retention nor new carious lesions formation (p > 0.05). At the 12-month recall, 57 molars had good retention (89.06%) from sub-group A and 44 molars (68.75%) from sub-group B; there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0187) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. At the last recall after 2 years, sub-group A had a higher number of molars with perfect sealing (47–73.43%) and 8 molars (12.5%) with new caries lesions and sub-group B had 23 (35.93%) molars with perfect sealing and 15 molars (23.44%) with new caries lesions; there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. Conclusions: The glass carbomer retention is very inferior to the resin-based material. The glass carbomer sealant was effective in preventing new caries development, comparable with the conventional resin-based sealant. MDPI 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8871583/ /pubmed/35206153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041966 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Beresescu, Liana Kovacs, Monika Vlasa, Alexandru Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela Benedek, Csilla Pop, Mihai Bungardean, Denisa Eșian, Daniela Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title | Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_full | Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_fullStr | Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_full_unstemmed | Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_short | Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant |
title_sort | retention ability of a glass carbomer pit and fissure sealant |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041966 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beresesculiana retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant AT kovacsmonika retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant AT vlasaalexandru retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant AT stoicaalexandramihaela retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant AT benedekcsilla retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant AT popmihai retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant AT bungardeandenisa retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant AT esiandaniela retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant |