Cargando…

Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant

Dental sealants are an excellent means to prevent pits and fissure decay. Currently, there are multiple commercially available sealant materials. The purpose of this study was to assess the retention of glass carbomer fissure sealant and the incidence of secondary caries over a period of 24 months i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beresescu, Liana, Kovacs, Monika, Vlasa, Alexandru, Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela, Benedek, Csilla, Pop, Mihai, Bungardean, Denisa, Eșian, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206153
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041966
_version_ 1784657030680674304
author Beresescu, Liana
Kovacs, Monika
Vlasa, Alexandru
Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela
Benedek, Csilla
Pop, Mihai
Bungardean, Denisa
Eșian, Daniela
author_facet Beresescu, Liana
Kovacs, Monika
Vlasa, Alexandru
Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela
Benedek, Csilla
Pop, Mihai
Bungardean, Denisa
Eșian, Daniela
author_sort Beresescu, Liana
collection PubMed
description Dental sealants are an excellent means to prevent pits and fissure decay. Currently, there are multiple commercially available sealant materials. The purpose of this study was to assess the retention of glass carbomer fissure sealant and the incidence of secondary caries over a period of 24 months in comparison with a resin-based sealant. Materials and Methods: We included 32 children in the study, with ages between six and eight years and an average age of 6.8 years old. For each child, we sealed four permanent molars (totaling 128 teeth). The study group was divided into sub-groups. Sub-group A was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with composite resin-based fissure sealant, Helioseal F™, and sub-group B was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with glass carbomer cement, GCP Glass Seal™. The sealants were assessed clinically at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Results: The 6-month follow-up evaluation showed no statistically significant differences between the two materials neither regarding sealant retention nor new carious lesions formation (p > 0.05). At the 12-month recall, 57 molars had good retention (89.06%) from sub-group A and 44 molars (68.75%) from sub-group B; there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0187) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. At the last recall after 2 years, sub-group A had a higher number of molars with perfect sealing (47–73.43%) and 8 molars (12.5%) with new caries lesions and sub-group B had 23 (35.93%) molars with perfect sealing and 15 molars (23.44%) with new caries lesions; there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. Conclusions: The glass carbomer retention is very inferior to the resin-based material. The glass carbomer sealant was effective in preventing new caries development, comparable with the conventional resin-based sealant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8871583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88715832022-02-25 Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant Beresescu, Liana Kovacs, Monika Vlasa, Alexandru Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela Benedek, Csilla Pop, Mihai Bungardean, Denisa Eșian, Daniela Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Dental sealants are an excellent means to prevent pits and fissure decay. Currently, there are multiple commercially available sealant materials. The purpose of this study was to assess the retention of glass carbomer fissure sealant and the incidence of secondary caries over a period of 24 months in comparison with a resin-based sealant. Materials and Methods: We included 32 children in the study, with ages between six and eight years and an average age of 6.8 years old. For each child, we sealed four permanent molars (totaling 128 teeth). The study group was divided into sub-groups. Sub-group A was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with composite resin-based fissure sealant, Helioseal F™, and sub-group B was represented by 64 first permanent molars which underwent dental sealing procedures with glass carbomer cement, GCP Glass Seal™. The sealants were assessed clinically at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Results: The 6-month follow-up evaluation showed no statistically significant differences between the two materials neither regarding sealant retention nor new carious lesions formation (p > 0.05). At the 12-month recall, 57 molars had good retention (89.06%) from sub-group A and 44 molars (68.75%) from sub-group B; there was a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0187) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. At the last recall after 2 years, sub-group A had a higher number of molars with perfect sealing (47–73.43%) and 8 molars (12.5%) with new caries lesions and sub-group B had 23 (35.93%) molars with perfect sealing and 15 molars (23.44%) with new caries lesions; there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001) between the two treatment choices only regarding material retention. Conclusions: The glass carbomer retention is very inferior to the resin-based material. The glass carbomer sealant was effective in preventing new caries development, comparable with the conventional resin-based sealant. MDPI 2022-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8871583/ /pubmed/35206153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041966 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beresescu, Liana
Kovacs, Monika
Vlasa, Alexandru
Stoica, Alexandra Mihaela
Benedek, Csilla
Pop, Mihai
Bungardean, Denisa
Eșian, Daniela
Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant
title Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_full Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_fullStr Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_full_unstemmed Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_short Retention Ability of a Glass Carbomer Pit and Fissure Sealant
title_sort retention ability of a glass carbomer pit and fissure sealant
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206153
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041966
work_keys_str_mv AT beresesculiana retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant
AT kovacsmonika retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant
AT vlasaalexandru retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant
AT stoicaalexandramihaela retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant
AT benedekcsilla retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant
AT popmihai retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant
AT bungardeandenisa retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant
AT esiandaniela retentionabilityofaglasscarbomerpitandfissuresealant