Cargando…

Experimental and Numerical Study of the Laminar Burning Velocity and Pollutant Emissions of the Mixture Gas of Methane and Carbon Dioxide

This paper presents the experimental and numerical study of the laminar burning velocity and pollutant emissions of the mixture gas of methane and carbon dioxide. Compared to previous research, a wider range of experimental conditions was realized in this paper: CO(2) dilution level up to 60% (volum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yalin, Wang, Yu, Zhang, Xueqian, Zhou, Guoping, Yan, Beibei, Bastiaans, Rob J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042078
_version_ 1784657077694627840
author Wang, Yalin
Wang, Yu
Zhang, Xueqian
Zhou, Guoping
Yan, Beibei
Bastiaans, Rob J. M.
author_facet Wang, Yalin
Wang, Yu
Zhang, Xueqian
Zhou, Guoping
Yan, Beibei
Bastiaans, Rob J. M.
author_sort Wang, Yalin
collection PubMed
description This paper presents the experimental and numerical study of the laminar burning velocity and pollutant emissions of the mixture gas of methane and carbon dioxide. Compared to previous research, a wider range of experimental conditions was realized in this paper: CO(2) dilution level up to 60% (volume fraction) and equivalence ratio of 0.7–1.3. The burning velocities were measured using the heat flux method. The CO and NO emissions after premixed combustion were measured by a gas analyzer placed 20 cm downstream of the flame. The one-dimensional free flames were simulated using the in-house laminar flame code CHEM1D. Four chemical kinetic mechanisms, GRI-Mech 3.0, San Diego, Konnov, and USC Mech II were used in Chem1D. The results showed that, for laminar burning velocity, the simulation results are all lower than the experimental results. GRI Mech 3.0 showed the best agreement when the CO(2) content was below 20%. USC Mech II showed the best consistency when the CO(2) content was between 40 and 60%. For CO emission, these four mechanisms all showed a small error compared with the experiments. When CO(2) content is higher than 40%, the deviation between simulation and experiment becomes bigger. When the CO(2) ratio is more than 20%, the proportion of CO(2) does not affect CO emission so much. For NO emission, when the CO(2) content is 40%, the results from simulation and experiment showed a good agreement. As the proportion of CO(2) increases, the difference in NO emissions decreases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8871781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88717812022-02-25 Experimental and Numerical Study of the Laminar Burning Velocity and Pollutant Emissions of the Mixture Gas of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Wang, Yalin Wang, Yu Zhang, Xueqian Zhou, Guoping Yan, Beibei Bastiaans, Rob J. M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This paper presents the experimental and numerical study of the laminar burning velocity and pollutant emissions of the mixture gas of methane and carbon dioxide. Compared to previous research, a wider range of experimental conditions was realized in this paper: CO(2) dilution level up to 60% (volume fraction) and equivalence ratio of 0.7–1.3. The burning velocities were measured using the heat flux method. The CO and NO emissions after premixed combustion were measured by a gas analyzer placed 20 cm downstream of the flame. The one-dimensional free flames were simulated using the in-house laminar flame code CHEM1D. Four chemical kinetic mechanisms, GRI-Mech 3.0, San Diego, Konnov, and USC Mech II were used in Chem1D. The results showed that, for laminar burning velocity, the simulation results are all lower than the experimental results. GRI Mech 3.0 showed the best agreement when the CO(2) content was below 20%. USC Mech II showed the best consistency when the CO(2) content was between 40 and 60%. For CO emission, these four mechanisms all showed a small error compared with the experiments. When CO(2) content is higher than 40%, the deviation between simulation and experiment becomes bigger. When the CO(2) ratio is more than 20%, the proportion of CO(2) does not affect CO emission so much. For NO emission, when the CO(2) content is 40%, the results from simulation and experiment showed a good agreement. As the proportion of CO(2) increases, the difference in NO emissions decreases. MDPI 2022-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8871781/ /pubmed/35206266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042078 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Yalin
Wang, Yu
Zhang, Xueqian
Zhou, Guoping
Yan, Beibei
Bastiaans, Rob J. M.
Experimental and Numerical Study of the Laminar Burning Velocity and Pollutant Emissions of the Mixture Gas of Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title Experimental and Numerical Study of the Laminar Burning Velocity and Pollutant Emissions of the Mixture Gas of Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_full Experimental and Numerical Study of the Laminar Burning Velocity and Pollutant Emissions of the Mixture Gas of Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_fullStr Experimental and Numerical Study of the Laminar Burning Velocity and Pollutant Emissions of the Mixture Gas of Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_full_unstemmed Experimental and Numerical Study of the Laminar Burning Velocity and Pollutant Emissions of the Mixture Gas of Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_short Experimental and Numerical Study of the Laminar Burning Velocity and Pollutant Emissions of the Mixture Gas of Methane and Carbon Dioxide
title_sort experimental and numerical study of the laminar burning velocity and pollutant emissions of the mixture gas of methane and carbon dioxide
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042078
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyalin experimentalandnumericalstudyofthelaminarburningvelocityandpollutantemissionsofthemixturegasofmethaneandcarbondioxide
AT wangyu experimentalandnumericalstudyofthelaminarburningvelocityandpollutantemissionsofthemixturegasofmethaneandcarbondioxide
AT zhangxueqian experimentalandnumericalstudyofthelaminarburningvelocityandpollutantemissionsofthemixturegasofmethaneandcarbondioxide
AT zhouguoping experimentalandnumericalstudyofthelaminarburningvelocityandpollutantemissionsofthemixturegasofmethaneandcarbondioxide
AT yanbeibei experimentalandnumericalstudyofthelaminarburningvelocityandpollutantemissionsofthemixturegasofmethaneandcarbondioxide
AT bastiaansrobjm experimentalandnumericalstudyofthelaminarburningvelocityandpollutantemissionsofthemixturegasofmethaneandcarbondioxide