Cargando…

Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

This study introduces and demonstrates a comprehensive, accurate, unbiased approach to robust quantitative comparison of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) appropriate for establishing substantial equivalence (or lack thereof) between inhaled nicotine products. The approach is demonstrated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hensel, Edward C., Eddingsaas, Nathan C., Saleh, Qutaiba M., Jayasekera, Shehan, Sarles, Samantha Emma, DiFrancesco, A. Gary, Robinson, Risa J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206329
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042144
_version_ 1784657087073091584
author Hensel, Edward C.
Eddingsaas, Nathan C.
Saleh, Qutaiba M.
Jayasekera, Shehan
Sarles, Samantha Emma
DiFrancesco, A. Gary
Robinson, Risa J.
author_facet Hensel, Edward C.
Eddingsaas, Nathan C.
Saleh, Qutaiba M.
Jayasekera, Shehan
Sarles, Samantha Emma
DiFrancesco, A. Gary
Robinson, Risa J.
author_sort Hensel, Edward C.
collection PubMed
description This study introduces and demonstrates a comprehensive, accurate, unbiased approach to robust quantitative comparison of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) appropriate for establishing substantial equivalence (or lack thereof) between inhaled nicotine products. The approach is demonstrated across a family of thirteen pen- and pod-style ENDS products. Methods employed consist of formulating a robust emissions surface regression model, quantifying the empirical accuracy of the model as applied to each product, evaluating relationships between product design characteristics and maximum emissions characteristics, and presenting results in formats useful to researchers, regulators, and consumers. Results provide a response surface to characterize emissions (total particulate matter and constituents thereof) from each ENDS appropriate for use in a computer model and for conducting quantitative exposure comparisons between products. Results demonstrate that emissions vary as a function of puff duration, flow rate, e-liquid composition, and device operating power. Further, results indicate that regulating design characteristics of ENDS devices and consumables may not achieve desired public health outcomes; it is more effective to regulate maximum permissible emissions directly. Three emissions outcome measures (yield per puff, mass concentration, and constituent mass ratio) are recommended for adoption as standard quantities for reporting by manufacturers and research laboratories. The approach provides a means of: (a) quantifying and comparing maximal emissions from ENDS products spanning their entire operating envelope, (b) comparative evaluation of ENDS devices and consumable design characteristics, and (c) establishing comparative equivalence of maximal emissions from ENDS. A consumer-oriented product emissions dashboard is proposed for comparative evaluation of ENDS exposure potential. Maximum achievable power dissipated in the coil of ENDS is identified as a potentially effective regulatory parameter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8871820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88718202022-02-25 Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Hensel, Edward C. Eddingsaas, Nathan C. Saleh, Qutaiba M. Jayasekera, Shehan Sarles, Samantha Emma DiFrancesco, A. Gary Robinson, Risa J. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study introduces and demonstrates a comprehensive, accurate, unbiased approach to robust quantitative comparison of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) appropriate for establishing substantial equivalence (or lack thereof) between inhaled nicotine products. The approach is demonstrated across a family of thirteen pen- and pod-style ENDS products. Methods employed consist of formulating a robust emissions surface regression model, quantifying the empirical accuracy of the model as applied to each product, evaluating relationships between product design characteristics and maximum emissions characteristics, and presenting results in formats useful to researchers, regulators, and consumers. Results provide a response surface to characterize emissions (total particulate matter and constituents thereof) from each ENDS appropriate for use in a computer model and for conducting quantitative exposure comparisons between products. Results demonstrate that emissions vary as a function of puff duration, flow rate, e-liquid composition, and device operating power. Further, results indicate that regulating design characteristics of ENDS devices and consumables may not achieve desired public health outcomes; it is more effective to regulate maximum permissible emissions directly. Three emissions outcome measures (yield per puff, mass concentration, and constituent mass ratio) are recommended for adoption as standard quantities for reporting by manufacturers and research laboratories. The approach provides a means of: (a) quantifying and comparing maximal emissions from ENDS products spanning their entire operating envelope, (b) comparative evaluation of ENDS devices and consumable design characteristics, and (c) establishing comparative equivalence of maximal emissions from ENDS. A consumer-oriented product emissions dashboard is proposed for comparative evaluation of ENDS exposure potential. Maximum achievable power dissipated in the coil of ENDS is identified as a potentially effective regulatory parameter. MDPI 2022-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8871820/ /pubmed/35206329 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042144 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hensel, Edward C.
Eddingsaas, Nathan C.
Saleh, Qutaiba M.
Jayasekera, Shehan
Sarles, Samantha Emma
DiFrancesco, A. Gary
Robinson, Risa J.
Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
title Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
title_full Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
title_fullStr Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
title_full_unstemmed Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
title_short Proposed Standard Test Protocols and Outcome Measures for Quantitative Comparison of Emissions from Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
title_sort proposed standard test protocols and outcome measures for quantitative comparison of emissions from electronic nicotine delivery systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8871820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206329
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042144
work_keys_str_mv AT henseledwardc proposedstandardtestprotocolsandoutcomemeasuresforquantitativecomparisonofemissionsfromelectronicnicotinedeliverysystems
AT eddingsaasnathanc proposedstandardtestprotocolsandoutcomemeasuresforquantitativecomparisonofemissionsfromelectronicnicotinedeliverysystems
AT salehqutaibam proposedstandardtestprotocolsandoutcomemeasuresforquantitativecomparisonofemissionsfromelectronicnicotinedeliverysystems
AT jayasekerashehan proposedstandardtestprotocolsandoutcomemeasuresforquantitativecomparisonofemissionsfromelectronicnicotinedeliverysystems
AT sarlessamanthaemma proposedstandardtestprotocolsandoutcomemeasuresforquantitativecomparisonofemissionsfromelectronicnicotinedeliverysystems
AT difrancescoagary proposedstandardtestprotocolsandoutcomemeasuresforquantitativecomparisonofemissionsfromelectronicnicotinedeliverysystems
AT robinsonrisaj proposedstandardtestprotocolsandoutcomemeasuresforquantitativecomparisonofemissionsfromelectronicnicotinedeliverysystems