Cargando…

Functional Innovation through Gene Duplication Followed by Frameshift Mutation

In his influential book “Evolution by Gene Duplication”, Ohno postulated that frameshift mutation could lead to a new function after duplication, but frameshift mutation is generally thought to be deleterious, and thus drew little attention in functional innovation in duplicate evolution. To this en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Baocheng, Zou, Ming, Sakamoto, Takahiro, Innan, Hideki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13020190
_version_ 1784657147328462848
author Guo, Baocheng
Zou, Ming
Sakamoto, Takahiro
Innan, Hideki
author_facet Guo, Baocheng
Zou, Ming
Sakamoto, Takahiro
Innan, Hideki
author_sort Guo, Baocheng
collection PubMed
description In his influential book “Evolution by Gene Duplication”, Ohno postulated that frameshift mutation could lead to a new function after duplication, but frameshift mutation is generally thought to be deleterious, and thus drew little attention in functional innovation in duplicate evolution. To this end, we here report an exhaustive survey of the genomes of human, mouse, zebrafish, and fruit fly. We identified 80 duplicate genes that involved frameshift mutations after duplication. The frameshift mutation preferentially located close to the C-terminus in most cases (55/88), which indicated that a frameshift mutation that changed the reading frame in a small part at the end of a duplicate may likely have contributed to adaptive evolution (e.g., human genes NOTCH2NL and ARHGAP11B) otherwise too deleterious to survive. A few cases (11/80) involved multiple frameshift mutations, exhibiting various patterns of modifications of the reading frame. Functionality of duplicate genes involving frameshift mutations was confirmed by sequence characteristics and expression profile, suggesting a potential role of frameshift mutation in creating functional novelty. We thus showed that genomes have non-negligible numbers of genes that have experienced frameshift mutations following gene duplication. Our results demonstrated the potential importance of frameshift mutations in molecular evolution, as Ohno verbally argued 50 years ago.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8872073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88720732022-02-25 Functional Innovation through Gene Duplication Followed by Frameshift Mutation Guo, Baocheng Zou, Ming Sakamoto, Takahiro Innan, Hideki Genes (Basel) Brief Report In his influential book “Evolution by Gene Duplication”, Ohno postulated that frameshift mutation could lead to a new function after duplication, but frameshift mutation is generally thought to be deleterious, and thus drew little attention in functional innovation in duplicate evolution. To this end, we here report an exhaustive survey of the genomes of human, mouse, zebrafish, and fruit fly. We identified 80 duplicate genes that involved frameshift mutations after duplication. The frameshift mutation preferentially located close to the C-terminus in most cases (55/88), which indicated that a frameshift mutation that changed the reading frame in a small part at the end of a duplicate may likely have contributed to adaptive evolution (e.g., human genes NOTCH2NL and ARHGAP11B) otherwise too deleterious to survive. A few cases (11/80) involved multiple frameshift mutations, exhibiting various patterns of modifications of the reading frame. Functionality of duplicate genes involving frameshift mutations was confirmed by sequence characteristics and expression profile, suggesting a potential role of frameshift mutation in creating functional novelty. We thus showed that genomes have non-negligible numbers of genes that have experienced frameshift mutations following gene duplication. Our results demonstrated the potential importance of frameshift mutations in molecular evolution, as Ohno verbally argued 50 years ago. MDPI 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8872073/ /pubmed/35205235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13020190 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Guo, Baocheng
Zou, Ming
Sakamoto, Takahiro
Innan, Hideki
Functional Innovation through Gene Duplication Followed by Frameshift Mutation
title Functional Innovation through Gene Duplication Followed by Frameshift Mutation
title_full Functional Innovation through Gene Duplication Followed by Frameshift Mutation
title_fullStr Functional Innovation through Gene Duplication Followed by Frameshift Mutation
title_full_unstemmed Functional Innovation through Gene Duplication Followed by Frameshift Mutation
title_short Functional Innovation through Gene Duplication Followed by Frameshift Mutation
title_sort functional innovation through gene duplication followed by frameshift mutation
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35205235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes13020190
work_keys_str_mv AT guobaocheng functionalinnovationthroughgeneduplicationfollowedbyframeshiftmutation
AT zouming functionalinnovationthroughgeneduplicationfollowedbyframeshiftmutation
AT sakamototakahiro functionalinnovationthroughgeneduplicationfollowedbyframeshiftmutation
AT innanhideki functionalinnovationthroughgeneduplicationfollowedbyframeshiftmutation