Cargando…
Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites
Airborne pollen monitoring has been an arduous task, making ecological applications and allergy management virtually disconnected from everyday practice. Over the last decade, intensive research has been conducted worldwide to automate this task and to obtain real-time measurements. The aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042471 |
_version_ | 1784657220729831424 |
---|---|
author | Plaza, Maria Pilar Kolek, Franziska Leier-Wirtz, Vivien Brunner, Jens Otto Traidl-Hoffmann, Claudia Damialis, Athanasios |
author_facet | Plaza, Maria Pilar Kolek, Franziska Leier-Wirtz, Vivien Brunner, Jens Otto Traidl-Hoffmann, Claudia Damialis, Athanasios |
author_sort | Plaza, Maria Pilar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Airborne pollen monitoring has been an arduous task, making ecological applications and allergy management virtually disconnected from everyday practice. Over the last decade, intensive research has been conducted worldwide to automate this task and to obtain real-time measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate such an automated biomonitoring system vs. the conventional ‘gold-standard’ Hirst-type technique, attempting to assess which may more accurately provide the genuine exposure to airborne pollen. Airborne pollen was monitored in Augsburg since 2015 with two different methods, a novel automatic Bio-Aerosol Analyser, and with the conventional 7-day recording Hirst-type volumetric trap, in two different sites. The reliability, performance, accuracy, and comparability of the BAA500 Pollen Monitor (PoMo) vs. the conventional device were investigated, by use of approximately 2.5 million particles sampled during the study period. The observations made by the automated PoMo showed an average accuracy of approximately 85%. However, it also exhibited reliability problems, with information gaps within the main pollen season of between 17 to 19 days. The PoMo automated algorithm had identification issues, mainly confusing the taxa of Populus, Salix and Tilia. Hirst-type measurements consistently exhibited lower pollen abundances (median of annual pollen integral: 2080), however, seasonal traits were more comparable, with the PoMo pollen season starting slightly later (median: 3 days), peaking later (median: 5 days) but also ending later (median: 14 days). Daily pollen concentrations reported by Hirst-type traps vs. PoMo were significantly, but not closely, correlated (r = 0.53–0.55), even after manual classification. Automatic pollen monitoring has already shown signs of efficiency and accuracy, despite its young age; here it is suggested that automatic pollen monitoring systems may be more effective in capturing a larger proportion of the airborne pollen diversity. Even though reliability issues still exist, we expect that this new generation of automated bioaerosol monitoring will eventually change the aerobiological era, as known for almost 70 years now. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8872361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88723612022-02-25 Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites Plaza, Maria Pilar Kolek, Franziska Leier-Wirtz, Vivien Brunner, Jens Otto Traidl-Hoffmann, Claudia Damialis, Athanasios Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Airborne pollen monitoring has been an arduous task, making ecological applications and allergy management virtually disconnected from everyday practice. Over the last decade, intensive research has been conducted worldwide to automate this task and to obtain real-time measurements. The aim of this study was to evaluate such an automated biomonitoring system vs. the conventional ‘gold-standard’ Hirst-type technique, attempting to assess which may more accurately provide the genuine exposure to airborne pollen. Airborne pollen was monitored in Augsburg since 2015 with two different methods, a novel automatic Bio-Aerosol Analyser, and with the conventional 7-day recording Hirst-type volumetric trap, in two different sites. The reliability, performance, accuracy, and comparability of the BAA500 Pollen Monitor (PoMo) vs. the conventional device were investigated, by use of approximately 2.5 million particles sampled during the study period. The observations made by the automated PoMo showed an average accuracy of approximately 85%. However, it also exhibited reliability problems, with information gaps within the main pollen season of between 17 to 19 days. The PoMo automated algorithm had identification issues, mainly confusing the taxa of Populus, Salix and Tilia. Hirst-type measurements consistently exhibited lower pollen abundances (median of annual pollen integral: 2080), however, seasonal traits were more comparable, with the PoMo pollen season starting slightly later (median: 3 days), peaking later (median: 5 days) but also ending later (median: 14 days). Daily pollen concentrations reported by Hirst-type traps vs. PoMo were significantly, but not closely, correlated (r = 0.53–0.55), even after manual classification. Automatic pollen monitoring has already shown signs of efficiency and accuracy, despite its young age; here it is suggested that automatic pollen monitoring systems may be more effective in capturing a larger proportion of the airborne pollen diversity. Even though reliability issues still exist, we expect that this new generation of automated bioaerosol monitoring will eventually change the aerobiological era, as known for almost 70 years now. MDPI 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8872361/ /pubmed/35206669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042471 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Plaza, Maria Pilar Kolek, Franziska Leier-Wirtz, Vivien Brunner, Jens Otto Traidl-Hoffmann, Claudia Damialis, Athanasios Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites |
title | Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites |
title_full | Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites |
title_fullStr | Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites |
title_full_unstemmed | Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites |
title_short | Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites |
title_sort | detecting airborne pollen using an automatic, real-time monitoring system: evidence from two sites |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206669 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042471 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT plazamariapilar detectingairbornepollenusinganautomaticrealtimemonitoringsystemevidencefromtwosites AT kolekfranziska detectingairbornepollenusinganautomaticrealtimemonitoringsystemevidencefromtwosites AT leierwirtzvivien detectingairbornepollenusinganautomaticrealtimemonitoringsystemevidencefromtwosites AT brunnerjensotto detectingairbornepollenusinganautomaticrealtimemonitoringsystemevidencefromtwosites AT traidlhoffmannclaudia detectingairbornepollenusinganautomaticrealtimemonitoringsystemevidencefromtwosites AT damialisathanasios detectingairbornepollenusinganautomaticrealtimemonitoringsystemevidencefromtwosites |