Cargando…

Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions

Patient education materials (PEMs) were assessed from chronic health condition associations to determine their quality and if they were above the 6th grade reading level (GRL) recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health. PEMs from 55 associations were assessed fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoang, Peter Minh, van Ballegooie, Courtney
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020234
_version_ 1784657242503512064
author Hoang, Peter Minh
van Ballegooie, Courtney
author_facet Hoang, Peter Minh
van Ballegooie, Courtney
author_sort Hoang, Peter Minh
collection PubMed
description Patient education materials (PEMs) were assessed from chronic health condition associations to determine their quality and if they were above the 6th grade reading level (GRL) recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health. PEMs from 55 associations were assessed for their GRL using ten readability scales and underwent a difficult word analysis. The associations had their quality assessed using two methods: the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmarks and Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct certification (HONCode). Two thousand five hundred and ninety PEMs, collected between June and November 2021, were analyzed. The overall GRL average was 10.8 ± 2.8, with a range of 0 to 19. Difficult word analysis showed that 15.8% ± 4.8 contained complex words of 3 or more syllables and 25.7% ± 6.3 contained words which were unfamiliar. No association displayed all four indicators of quality according to JAMA Benchmarks or held an up-to-date HONCode certification. The PEM readability continues to be written at a level above the recommended GRL. Additionally, the lack of quality indicators from the associations’ websites may make it difficult for older adults to identify the sources as credible. This represents an opportunity to optimize materials that would be understood by a wider audience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8872454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88724542022-02-25 Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions Hoang, Peter Minh van Ballegooie, Courtney Healthcare (Basel) Article Patient education materials (PEMs) were assessed from chronic health condition associations to determine their quality and if they were above the 6th grade reading level (GRL) recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health. PEMs from 55 associations were assessed for their GRL using ten readability scales and underwent a difficult word analysis. The associations had their quality assessed using two methods: the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmarks and Health on the Net Foundation Code of Conduct certification (HONCode). Two thousand five hundred and ninety PEMs, collected between June and November 2021, were analyzed. The overall GRL average was 10.8 ± 2.8, with a range of 0 to 19. Difficult word analysis showed that 15.8% ± 4.8 contained complex words of 3 or more syllables and 25.7% ± 6.3 contained words which were unfamiliar. No association displayed all four indicators of quality according to JAMA Benchmarks or held an up-to-date HONCode certification. The PEM readability continues to be written at a level above the recommended GRL. Additionally, the lack of quality indicators from the associations’ websites may make it difficult for older adults to identify the sources as credible. This represents an opportunity to optimize materials that would be understood by a wider audience. MDPI 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8872454/ /pubmed/35206850 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020234 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hoang, Peter Minh
van Ballegooie, Courtney
Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions
title Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions
title_full Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions
title_fullStr Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions
title_short Assessment of the Readability and Quality of Online Patient Education Material for Chronic Medical Conditions
title_sort assessment of the readability and quality of online patient education material for chronic medical conditions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35206850
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020234
work_keys_str_mv AT hoangpeterminh assessmentofthereadabilityandqualityofonlinepatienteducationmaterialforchronicmedicalconditions
AT vanballegooiecourtney assessmentofthereadabilityandqualityofonlinepatienteducationmaterialforchronicmedicalconditions