Cargando…
Compulsory vaccination against COVID-19: a legal and ethical perspective on public good versus personal reticence
Coercive measures to protect public health are controversial, eliciting questions regarding state-patient relationships and conflicts between individual autonomy and public good. This is challenging in a time when respect for patient autonomy has become elevated yet society faces an increasing numbe...
Autores principales: | Dunne, Colum P., Spain, Eimear |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8872645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35211839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-02942-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Dilemma of Compulsory Vaccinations—Ethical and Legal Considerations
por: Sela, Yael, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Science and Reticence
Publicado: (1905) -
The Habit of Reticence
Publicado: (1904) -
The Cultivation of Reticence
Publicado: (1919) -
Empowering analysts to undertake ethically and legally appropriate public good research.
por: O'Flynn, Lily
Publicado: (2022)