Cargando…
Possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge
Recently, interest has surged in similarity-based epistemologies of possibility. However, it has been pointed out that the notion of ‘relevant similarity’ is not properly developed in this literature. In this paper, I look at the research done in the field of analogical reasoning, where we find that...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03488-2 |
_version_ | 1784657380119674880 |
---|---|
author | Schoonen, Tom |
author_facet | Schoonen, Tom |
author_sort | Schoonen, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, interest has surged in similarity-based epistemologies of possibility. However, it has been pointed out that the notion of ‘relevant similarity’ is not properly developed in this literature. In this paper, I look at the research done in the field of analogical reasoning, where we find that one of the most promising ways of capturing relevance in similarity reasoning is by relying on the predictive analogy similarity relation. This takes relevant similarity to be based on shared properties that have structural relations to the property of interest. I argue that if we base our epistemology of possibility on similarity reasoning on the predictive analogy similarity relation, we require prior knowledge of the specifics of these structural relations. I discuss a number of possible responses to this on behalf of the similarity theorists given their methodological approach to the epistemology of modality more generally. They could either opt for making explicit the metaphysics underlying these structural relations, in which case they need to spell out how we can come to know these relations. Or they could opt for developing a theory that explains why we do not need to have explicit knowledge of these structural relations; for example by suggesting that we make use of epistemic shortcuts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8873056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88730562022-03-02 Possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge Schoonen, Tom Synthese Original Research Recently, interest has surged in similarity-based epistemologies of possibility. However, it has been pointed out that the notion of ‘relevant similarity’ is not properly developed in this literature. In this paper, I look at the research done in the field of analogical reasoning, where we find that one of the most promising ways of capturing relevance in similarity reasoning is by relying on the predictive analogy similarity relation. This takes relevant similarity to be based on shared properties that have structural relations to the property of interest. I argue that if we base our epistemology of possibility on similarity reasoning on the predictive analogy similarity relation, we require prior knowledge of the specifics of these structural relations. I discuss a number of possible responses to this on behalf of the similarity theorists given their methodological approach to the epistemology of modality more generally. They could either opt for making explicit the metaphysics underlying these structural relations, in which case they need to spell out how we can come to know these relations. Or they could opt for developing a theory that explains why we do not need to have explicit knowledge of these structural relations; for example by suggesting that we make use of epistemic shortcuts. Springer Netherlands 2022-02-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8873056/ /pubmed/35250107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03488-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Schoonen, Tom Possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge |
title | Possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge |
title_full | Possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge |
title_fullStr | Possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed | Possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge |
title_short | Possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge |
title_sort | possibility, relevant similarity, and structural knowledge |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35250107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03488-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schoonentom possibilityrelevantsimilarityandstructuralknowledge |