Cargando…

Assessment of different quantification metrics of [(18)F]-NaF PET/CT images of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the spill-in effect and the benefit in quantitative accuracy for [(18)F]-NaF PET/CT imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using the background correction (BC) technique. METHODS: Seventy-two datasets of patients diagnosed with AAA were reconstructed with ordered su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akerele, Mercy I., Mushari, Nouf A., Forsythe, Rachael O., Syed, Maaz, Karakatsanis, Nicolas A., Newby, David E., Dweck, Marc R., Tsoumpas, Charalampos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32557152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02220-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the spill-in effect and the benefit in quantitative accuracy for [(18)F]-NaF PET/CT imaging of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using the background correction (BC) technique. METHODS: Seventy-two datasets of patients diagnosed with AAA were reconstructed with ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm incorporating point spread function (PSF). Spill-in effect was investigated for the entire aneurysm (AAA), and part of the aneurysm excluding the region close to the bone (AAA(exc)). Quantifications of PSF and PSF+BC images using different thresholds (% of max. SUV in target regions-of-interest) to derive target-to-background (TBR) values (TBR(max), TBR(90), TBR(70) and TBR(50)) were compared at 3 and 10 iterations. RESULTS: TBR differences were observed between AAA and AAA(exc) due to spill-in effect from the bone into the aneurysm. TBR(max) showed the highest sensitivity to the spill-in effect while TBR(50) showed the least. The spill-in effect was reduced at 10 iterations compared to 3 iterations, but at the expense of reduced contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). TBR(50) yielded the best trade-off between increased CNR and reduced spill-in effect. PSF+BC method reduced TBR sensitivity to spill-in effect, especially at 3 iterations, compared to PSF (P-value ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: TBR(50) is robust metric for reduced spill-in and increased CNR. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12350-020-02220-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.