Cargando…
Comparative Aspects of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Arrays in Different Species
Studies in humans and mice indicate the critical role of the surrogate light chain in the selection of the productive immunoglobulin repertoire during B cell development. However, subsequent studies using mutant mice have also demonstrated that alternative pathways are allowed. Our recent investigat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.823145 |
_version_ | 1784657396244676608 |
---|---|
author | Sinkora, Marek Stepanova, Katerina Butler, John E. Sinkora, Marek Sinkora, Simon Sinkorova, Jana |
author_facet | Sinkora, Marek Stepanova, Katerina Butler, John E. Sinkora, Marek Sinkora, Simon Sinkorova, Jana |
author_sort | Sinkora, Marek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Studies in humans and mice indicate the critical role of the surrogate light chain in the selection of the productive immunoglobulin repertoire during B cell development. However, subsequent studies using mutant mice have also demonstrated that alternative pathways are allowed. Our recent investigation has shown that some species, such as pig, physiologically use preferential rearrangement of authentic light chains, and become independent of surrogate light chains. Here we summarize the findings from swine and compare them with results in other species. In both groups, allelic and isotypic exclusions remain intact, so the different processes do not alter the paradigm of B-cell monospecificity. Both groups also retained some other essential processes, such as segregated and sequential rearrangement of heavy and light chain loci, preferential rearrangement of light chain kappa before lambda, and functional κ-deleting element recombination. On the other hand, the respective order of heavy and light chains rearrangement may vary, and rearrangement of the light chain kappa and lambda on different chromosomes may occur independently. Studies have also confirmed that the surrogate light chain is not required for the selection of the productive repertoire of heavy chains and can be substituted by authentic light chains. These findings are important for understanding evolutional approaches, redundancy and efficiency of B-cell generation, dependencies on other regulatory factors, and strategies for constructing therapeutic antibodies in unrelated species. The results may also be important for explaining interspecies differences in the proportional use of light chains and for the understanding of divergences in rearrangement processes. Therefore, the division into two groups may not be definitive and there may be more groups of intermediate species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8873125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88731252022-02-26 Comparative Aspects of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Arrays in Different Species Sinkora, Marek Stepanova, Katerina Butler, John E. Sinkora, Marek Sinkora, Simon Sinkorova, Jana Front Immunol Immunology Studies in humans and mice indicate the critical role of the surrogate light chain in the selection of the productive immunoglobulin repertoire during B cell development. However, subsequent studies using mutant mice have also demonstrated that alternative pathways are allowed. Our recent investigation has shown that some species, such as pig, physiologically use preferential rearrangement of authentic light chains, and become independent of surrogate light chains. Here we summarize the findings from swine and compare them with results in other species. In both groups, allelic and isotypic exclusions remain intact, so the different processes do not alter the paradigm of B-cell monospecificity. Both groups also retained some other essential processes, such as segregated and sequential rearrangement of heavy and light chain loci, preferential rearrangement of light chain kappa before lambda, and functional κ-deleting element recombination. On the other hand, the respective order of heavy and light chains rearrangement may vary, and rearrangement of the light chain kappa and lambda on different chromosomes may occur independently. Studies have also confirmed that the surrogate light chain is not required for the selection of the productive repertoire of heavy chains and can be substituted by authentic light chains. These findings are important for understanding evolutional approaches, redundancy and efficiency of B-cell generation, dependencies on other regulatory factors, and strategies for constructing therapeutic antibodies in unrelated species. The results may also be important for explaining interspecies differences in the proportional use of light chains and for the understanding of divergences in rearrangement processes. Therefore, the division into two groups may not be definitive and there may be more groups of intermediate species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8873125/ /pubmed/35222402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.823145 Text en Copyright © 2022 Sinkora, Stepanova, Butler, Sinkora, Sinkora and Sinkorova https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Sinkora, Marek Stepanova, Katerina Butler, John E. Sinkora, Marek Sinkora, Simon Sinkorova, Jana Comparative Aspects of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Arrays in Different Species |
title | Comparative Aspects of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Arrays in Different Species |
title_full | Comparative Aspects of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Arrays in Different Species |
title_fullStr | Comparative Aspects of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Arrays in Different Species |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Aspects of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Arrays in Different Species |
title_short | Comparative Aspects of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangement Arrays in Different Species |
title_sort | comparative aspects of immunoglobulin gene rearrangement arrays in different species |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222402 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.823145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinkoramarek comparativeaspectsofimmunoglobulingenerearrangementarraysindifferentspecies AT stepanovakaterina comparativeaspectsofimmunoglobulingenerearrangementarraysindifferentspecies AT butlerjohne comparativeaspectsofimmunoglobulingenerearrangementarraysindifferentspecies AT sinkoramarek comparativeaspectsofimmunoglobulingenerearrangementarraysindifferentspecies AT sinkorasimon comparativeaspectsofimmunoglobulingenerearrangementarraysindifferentspecies AT sinkorovajana comparativeaspectsofimmunoglobulingenerearrangementarraysindifferentspecies |