Cargando…

A preliminary animal study on the prediction of nerve block success using ultrasonographic parameters

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonographic parameters as an indicator for predicting regional nerve block success. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block was performed in seven dogs using either 2% mepivacaine (nerve-block group) or saline (sham-block group). The cross-sect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiba, Emiko, Hamamoto, Kohei, Kanai, Eiichi, Oyama-Manabe, Noriko, Omoto, Kiyoka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35210487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06986-y
Descripción
Sumario:This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ultrasonographic parameters as an indicator for predicting regional nerve block success. Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block was performed in seven dogs using either 2% mepivacaine (nerve-block group) or saline (sham-block group). The cross-sectional area (CSA), nerve blood flow (NBF), and shear wave velocity (SWV) of the sciatic nerve (SWV(N)), SWV of the biceps femoris muscle (SWV(M)), and their ratio (SWV(NMR)) were measured at 0, 30, 60, and 90 min after the nerve block as well as the change rate of each parameter from the baseline. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic value of each parameter in the prediction of nerve block success. No significant changes were observed in the CSA or NBF in association with the nerve block. The SWV(N) and SWV(NMR) in the nerve-block group were significantly higher than those in the sham-block group at 90 min and at 30, 60, and 90 min, respectively (p < 0.05). The change rates of SWV(N) and SWV(NMR) in the nerve-block group were significantly higher than those in the sham-block group at all time points (p < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed that SWV(N) had a moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC], 0.779), whereas SWV(NMR) and change rates of SWV(N) and SWV(NMR) had a high diagnostic accuracy (AUC, 0.947, 0.998, and 1.000, respectively). Ultrasonographic evaluation of the SWV(N) and SWV(NMR) could be used as indicators for predicting nerve block success.