Cargando…

Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine the impact of neural mobilization by tensioner’s technique (NMTT) on the centralization of symptoms and pain in patients with cervicobrachial pain syndrome (CBPS). OVERVIEW OF LITERA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sudhakar, Kavita, Khan, Sohrab A., Saraswat, Avi, Makhija, Meena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33687860
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0109
_version_ 1784657583955509248
author Sudhakar, Kavita
Khan, Sohrab A.
Saraswat, Avi
Makhija, Meena
author_facet Sudhakar, Kavita
Khan, Sohrab A.
Saraswat, Avi
Makhija, Meena
author_sort Sudhakar, Kavita
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine the impact of neural mobilization by tensioner’s technique (NMTT) on the centralization of symptoms and pain in patients with cervicobrachial pain syndrome (CBPS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: CBPS is a disabling condition of the neck that is characterized by pain and paresthesia in the upper quarter. Several techniques have successfully provided immediate and long-term relief in CBPS; however, few studies have evaluated the effect of these techniques on the centralization of symptoms. METHODS: Thirty patients aged 18–45 years with a complaint of pain in the neck that had persisted for 2–12 weeks radiating to the arm and fulfilling Elvey’s criteria were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Group A received NMTT plus conventional treatment (hot pack and postural advice with cervical lateral glide), and group B received only conventional treatment 3 times a week for 2 weeks. The outcome measures were Wernicke’s scale score for the centralization of symptoms and Visual Analog Scale score for pain intensity. Within- and between-group comparisons were made before initiating treatment and at the end of the 3rd and 6th sessions. Within group analyses for the centralization values were performed using Friedmann test, and between-group analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney test. A 2×3 mixed model of the analysis of variance was used for analyzing the pain levels. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) within and between the groups for both the measures at the end of the 3rd and 6th sessions. Thus, NMTT may be beneficial in decreasing the peripheralization of symptoms and pain intensity in patients with CBPS. CONCLUSIONS: NMTT can be used as an alternative and effective treatment option for patients with CBPS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8873992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88739922022-03-08 Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial Sudhakar, Kavita Khan, Sohrab A. Saraswat, Avi Makhija, Meena Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine the impact of neural mobilization by tensioner’s technique (NMTT) on the centralization of symptoms and pain in patients with cervicobrachial pain syndrome (CBPS). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: CBPS is a disabling condition of the neck that is characterized by pain and paresthesia in the upper quarter. Several techniques have successfully provided immediate and long-term relief in CBPS; however, few studies have evaluated the effect of these techniques on the centralization of symptoms. METHODS: Thirty patients aged 18–45 years with a complaint of pain in the neck that had persisted for 2–12 weeks radiating to the arm and fulfilling Elvey’s criteria were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Group A received NMTT plus conventional treatment (hot pack and postural advice with cervical lateral glide), and group B received only conventional treatment 3 times a week for 2 weeks. The outcome measures were Wernicke’s scale score for the centralization of symptoms and Visual Analog Scale score for pain intensity. Within- and between-group comparisons were made before initiating treatment and at the end of the 3rd and 6th sessions. Within group analyses for the centralization values were performed using Friedmann test, and between-group analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney test. A 2×3 mixed model of the analysis of variance was used for analyzing the pain levels. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) within and between the groups for both the measures at the end of the 3rd and 6th sessions. Thus, NMTT may be beneficial in decreasing the peripheralization of symptoms and pain intensity in patients with CBPS. CONCLUSIONS: NMTT can be used as an alternative and effective treatment option for patients with CBPS. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022-02 2021-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8873992/ /pubmed/33687860 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0109 Text en Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Sudhakar, Kavita
Khan, Sohrab A.
Saraswat, Avi
Makhija, Meena
Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort influence of tensioner’s mobilization on the centralization of symptoms in cervicobrachial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8873992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33687860
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0109
work_keys_str_mv AT sudhakarkavita influenceoftensionersmobilizationonthecentralizationofsymptomsincervicobrachialpainsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT khansohraba influenceoftensionersmobilizationonthecentralizationofsymptomsincervicobrachialpainsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saraswatavi influenceoftensionersmobilizationonthecentralizationofsymptomsincervicobrachialpainsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT makhijameena influenceoftensionersmobilizationonthecentralizationofsymptomsincervicobrachialpainsyndromearandomizedcontrolledtrial