Cargando…

A bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become the prevailing standard of care for treating complex soft tissue wounds and is now being considered for use in alternative applications including improving skin graft take. While it is generally agreed that negative pressure leads to improved wound h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Notorgiacomo, Gabrielle, Klug, Justin, Rapp, Scott, Boyce, Steven T., Schutte, Stacey C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13661
_version_ 1784657594281885696
author Notorgiacomo, Gabrielle
Klug, Justin
Rapp, Scott
Boyce, Steven T.
Schutte, Stacey C.
author_facet Notorgiacomo, Gabrielle
Klug, Justin
Rapp, Scott
Boyce, Steven T.
Schutte, Stacey C.
author_sort Notorgiacomo, Gabrielle
collection PubMed
description Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become the prevailing standard of care for treating complex soft tissue wounds and is now being considered for use in alternative applications including improving skin graft take. While it is generally agreed that negative pressure leads to improved wound healing, universal consensus on its optimal application is not supported in the literature. We describe the design and validation of a bioreactor to determine the prospective benefits of NPWT on skin grafts and engineered skin substitutes (ESS). Clinically relevant pressures were applied, and the native human skin was able to withstand greater negative pressures than the engineered substitutes. Both skin types were cultured under static, flow‐only, and −75 mm Hg conditions for 3 days. While it remained intact, there was damage to the epidermal‐dermal junction in the ESS after application of negative pressure. The normal skin remained viable under all culture conditions. The engineered skin underwent apoptosis in the flow‐only group; however, the application of negative pressure reduced apoptosis. Vascular endothelial growth factor levels were significantly higher in the normal flow‐only group, 152.0 ± 75.1 pg/mg protein, than the other culture conditions, 81.6 ± 35.5 pg/mg for the static and 103.6 ± pg/mg for the negative pressure conditions. The engineered skin had a similar trend but the differences were not significant. This bioreactor design can be used to evaluate the impacts of NPWT on the anatomy and physiology of skin to improve outcomes in wounds after grafting with normal or engineered skin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8874041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88740412022-02-28 A bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts Notorgiacomo, Gabrielle Klug, Justin Rapp, Scott Boyce, Steven T. Schutte, Stacey C. Int Wound J Original Articles Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has become the prevailing standard of care for treating complex soft tissue wounds and is now being considered for use in alternative applications including improving skin graft take. While it is generally agreed that negative pressure leads to improved wound healing, universal consensus on its optimal application is not supported in the literature. We describe the design and validation of a bioreactor to determine the prospective benefits of NPWT on skin grafts and engineered skin substitutes (ESS). Clinically relevant pressures were applied, and the native human skin was able to withstand greater negative pressures than the engineered substitutes. Both skin types were cultured under static, flow‐only, and −75 mm Hg conditions for 3 days. While it remained intact, there was damage to the epidermal‐dermal junction in the ESS after application of negative pressure. The normal skin remained viable under all culture conditions. The engineered skin underwent apoptosis in the flow‐only group; however, the application of negative pressure reduced apoptosis. Vascular endothelial growth factor levels were significantly higher in the normal flow‐only group, 152.0 ± 75.1 pg/mg protein, than the other culture conditions, 81.6 ± 35.5 pg/mg for the static and 103.6 ± pg/mg for the negative pressure conditions. The engineered skin had a similar trend but the differences were not significant. This bioreactor design can be used to evaluate the impacts of NPWT on the anatomy and physiology of skin to improve outcomes in wounds after grafting with normal or engineered skin. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8874041/ /pubmed/34235863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13661 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Notorgiacomo, Gabrielle
Klug, Justin
Rapp, Scott
Boyce, Steven T.
Schutte, Stacey C.
A bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts
title A bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts
title_full A bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts
title_fullStr A bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts
title_full_unstemmed A bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts
title_short A bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts
title_sort bioreactor for studying negative pressure wound therapy on skin grafts
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34235863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13661
work_keys_str_mv AT notorgiacomogabrielle abioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT klugjustin abioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT rappscott abioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT boycestevent abioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT schuttestaceyc abioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT notorgiacomogabrielle bioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT klugjustin bioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT rappscott bioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT boycestevent bioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts
AT schuttestaceyc bioreactorforstudyingnegativepressurewoundtherapyonskingrafts