Cargando…
Wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (ReCell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial
There is an urgent need for interventions that improve healing time, prevent amputations and recurrent ulceration in patients with diabetes‐related foot wounds. In this randomised, open‐label trial, participants were randomised to receive an application of non‐cultured autologous skin cells (“spray‐...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13646 |
_version_ | 1784657611623235584 |
---|---|
author | Manning, Laurens Ferreira, Ivana Bastos Gittings, Paul Hiew, Jonathan Ryan, Erica Baba, Mendel Raby, Edward Carville, Keryln Norman, Paul E. Davis, Wendy Angela Wood, Fiona Hamilton, Emma Jane Ritter, Jens Carsten |
author_facet | Manning, Laurens Ferreira, Ivana Bastos Gittings, Paul Hiew, Jonathan Ryan, Erica Baba, Mendel Raby, Edward Carville, Keryln Norman, Paul E. Davis, Wendy Angela Wood, Fiona Hamilton, Emma Jane Ritter, Jens Carsten |
author_sort | Manning, Laurens |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is an urgent need for interventions that improve healing time, prevent amputations and recurrent ulceration in patients with diabetes‐related foot wounds. In this randomised, open‐label trial, participants were randomised to receive an application of non‐cultured autologous skin cells (“spray‐on” skin; ReCell) or standard care interventions for large (>6 cm(2)), adequately vascularised wounds. The primary outcome was complete healing at 6 months, determined by assessors blinded to the intervention. Forty‐nine eligible foot wounds in 45 participants were randomised. An evaluable primary outcome was available for all wounds. The median (interquartile range) wound area at baseline was 11.4 (8.8‐17.6) cm(2). A total of 32 (65.3%) index wounds were completely healed at 6 months, including 16 of 24 (66.7%) in the spray‐on skin group and 16 of 25 (64.0%) in the standard care group (unadjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.13 (0.35‐3.65), P = .845). Lower body mass index (P = .002) and non‐plantar wounds (P = .009) were the only patient‐ or wound‐related factors associated with complete healing at 6 months. Spray‐on skin resulted in high rates of complete healing at 6 months in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds, but was not significantly better than standard care (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000511235). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8874115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88741152022-02-28 Wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (ReCell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial Manning, Laurens Ferreira, Ivana Bastos Gittings, Paul Hiew, Jonathan Ryan, Erica Baba, Mendel Raby, Edward Carville, Keryln Norman, Paul E. Davis, Wendy Angela Wood, Fiona Hamilton, Emma Jane Ritter, Jens Carsten Int Wound J Original Articles There is an urgent need for interventions that improve healing time, prevent amputations and recurrent ulceration in patients with diabetes‐related foot wounds. In this randomised, open‐label trial, participants were randomised to receive an application of non‐cultured autologous skin cells (“spray‐on” skin; ReCell) or standard care interventions for large (>6 cm(2)), adequately vascularised wounds. The primary outcome was complete healing at 6 months, determined by assessors blinded to the intervention. Forty‐nine eligible foot wounds in 45 participants were randomised. An evaluable primary outcome was available for all wounds. The median (interquartile range) wound area at baseline was 11.4 (8.8‐17.6) cm(2). A total of 32 (65.3%) index wounds were completely healed at 6 months, including 16 of 24 (66.7%) in the spray‐on skin group and 16 of 25 (64.0%) in the standard care group (unadjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.13 (0.35‐3.65), P = .845). Lower body mass index (P = .002) and non‐plantar wounds (P = .009) were the only patient‐ or wound‐related factors associated with complete healing at 6 months. Spray‐on skin resulted in high rates of complete healing at 6 months in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds, but was not significantly better than standard care (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000511235). Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2021-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8874115/ /pubmed/34156758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13646 Text en © 2021 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Manning, Laurens Ferreira, Ivana Bastos Gittings, Paul Hiew, Jonathan Ryan, Erica Baba, Mendel Raby, Edward Carville, Keryln Norman, Paul E. Davis, Wendy Angela Wood, Fiona Hamilton, Emma Jane Ritter, Jens Carsten Wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (ReCell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial |
title | Wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (ReCell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (ReCell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (ReCell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (ReCell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (ReCell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | wound healing with “spray‐on” autologous skin grafting (recell) compared with standard care in patients with large diabetes‐related foot wounds: an open‐label randomised controlled trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34156758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13646 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manninglaurens woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ferreiraivanabastos woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT gittingspaul woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hiewjonathan woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ryanerica woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT babamendel woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rabyedward woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT carvillekeryln woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT normanpaule woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT daviswendyangela woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT woodfiona woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hamiltonemmajane woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ritterjenscarsten woundhealingwithsprayonautologousskingraftingrecellcomparedwithstandardcareinpatientswithlargediabetesrelatedfootwoundsanopenlabelrandomisedcontrolledtrial |