Cargando…
Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science
Floods, as one of the most common disasters in the natural environment, have caused huge losses to human life and property. Predicting the flood resistance of poplar can effectively help researchers select seedlings scientifically and resist floods precisely. Using machine learning algorithms, model...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.821365 |
_version_ | 1784657618522865664 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Xuelin Zhang, Xinye Shen, Jingfang Du, Kebing |
author_facet | Xie, Xuelin Zhang, Xinye Shen, Jingfang Du, Kebing |
author_sort | Xie, Xuelin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Floods, as one of the most common disasters in the natural environment, have caused huge losses to human life and property. Predicting the flood resistance of poplar can effectively help researchers select seedlings scientifically and resist floods precisely. Using machine learning algorithms, models of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were established and evaluated. First of all, the evaluation indexes of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were analyzed and determined. Then, significance testing, correlation analysis, and three feature selection algorithms (Hierarchical clustering, Lasso, and Stepwise regression) were used to screen photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and environmental parameters. Based on this, four machine learning methods, BP neural network regression (BPR), extreme learning machine regression (ELMR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR) were used to predict the flood resistance of poplar. The results show that random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) have high precision. On the test set, the coefficient of determination (R(2)) is 0.8351 and 0.6864, the root mean square error (RMSE) is 0.2016 and 0.2780, and the mean absolute error (MAE) is 0.1782 and 0.2031, respectively. Therefore, random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) can be given priority to predict poplar flood resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8874143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88741432022-02-26 Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science Xie, Xuelin Zhang, Xinye Shen, Jingfang Du, Kebing Front Plant Sci Plant Science Floods, as one of the most common disasters in the natural environment, have caused huge losses to human life and property. Predicting the flood resistance of poplar can effectively help researchers select seedlings scientifically and resist floods precisely. Using machine learning algorithms, models of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were established and evaluated. First of all, the evaluation indexes of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were analyzed and determined. Then, significance testing, correlation analysis, and three feature selection algorithms (Hierarchical clustering, Lasso, and Stepwise regression) were used to screen photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and environmental parameters. Based on this, four machine learning methods, BP neural network regression (BPR), extreme learning machine regression (ELMR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR) were used to predict the flood resistance of poplar. The results show that random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) have high precision. On the test set, the coefficient of determination (R(2)) is 0.8351 and 0.6864, the root mean square error (RMSE) is 0.2016 and 0.2780, and the mean absolute error (MAE) is 0.1782 and 0.2031, respectively. Therefore, random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) can be given priority to predict poplar flood resistance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8874143/ /pubmed/35222479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.821365 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xie, Zhang, Shen and Du. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Xie, Xuelin Zhang, Xinye Shen, Jingfang Du, Kebing Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science |
title | Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science |
title_full | Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science |
title_fullStr | Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science |
title_full_unstemmed | Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science |
title_short | Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science |
title_sort | poplar’s waterlogging resistance modeling and evaluating: exploring and perfecting the feasibility of machine learning methods in plant science |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.821365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiexuelin poplarswaterloggingresistancemodelingandevaluatingexploringandperfectingthefeasibilityofmachinelearningmethodsinplantscience AT zhangxinye poplarswaterloggingresistancemodelingandevaluatingexploringandperfectingthefeasibilityofmachinelearningmethodsinplantscience AT shenjingfang poplarswaterloggingresistancemodelingandevaluatingexploringandperfectingthefeasibilityofmachinelearningmethodsinplantscience AT dukebing poplarswaterloggingresistancemodelingandevaluatingexploringandperfectingthefeasibilityofmachinelearningmethodsinplantscience |