Cargando…

Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science

Floods, as one of the most common disasters in the natural environment, have caused huge losses to human life and property. Predicting the flood resistance of poplar can effectively help researchers select seedlings scientifically and resist floods precisely. Using machine learning algorithms, model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Xuelin, Zhang, Xinye, Shen, Jingfang, Du, Kebing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.821365
_version_ 1784657618522865664
author Xie, Xuelin
Zhang, Xinye
Shen, Jingfang
Du, Kebing
author_facet Xie, Xuelin
Zhang, Xinye
Shen, Jingfang
Du, Kebing
author_sort Xie, Xuelin
collection PubMed
description Floods, as one of the most common disasters in the natural environment, have caused huge losses to human life and property. Predicting the flood resistance of poplar can effectively help researchers select seedlings scientifically and resist floods precisely. Using machine learning algorithms, models of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were established and evaluated. First of all, the evaluation indexes of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were analyzed and determined. Then, significance testing, correlation analysis, and three feature selection algorithms (Hierarchical clustering, Lasso, and Stepwise regression) were used to screen photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and environmental parameters. Based on this, four machine learning methods, BP neural network regression (BPR), extreme learning machine regression (ELMR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR) were used to predict the flood resistance of poplar. The results show that random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) have high precision. On the test set, the coefficient of determination (R(2)) is 0.8351 and 0.6864, the root mean square error (RMSE) is 0.2016 and 0.2780, and the mean absolute error (MAE) is 0.1782 and 0.2031, respectively. Therefore, random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) can be given priority to predict poplar flood resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8874143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88741432022-02-26 Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science Xie, Xuelin Zhang, Xinye Shen, Jingfang Du, Kebing Front Plant Sci Plant Science Floods, as one of the most common disasters in the natural environment, have caused huge losses to human life and property. Predicting the flood resistance of poplar can effectively help researchers select seedlings scientifically and resist floods precisely. Using machine learning algorithms, models of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were established and evaluated. First of all, the evaluation indexes of poplar’s waterlogging tolerance were analyzed and determined. Then, significance testing, correlation analysis, and three feature selection algorithms (Hierarchical clustering, Lasso, and Stepwise regression) were used to screen photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and environmental parameters. Based on this, four machine learning methods, BP neural network regression (BPR), extreme learning machine regression (ELMR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR) were used to predict the flood resistance of poplar. The results show that random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) have high precision. On the test set, the coefficient of determination (R(2)) is 0.8351 and 0.6864, the root mean square error (RMSE) is 0.2016 and 0.2780, and the mean absolute error (MAE) is 0.1782 and 0.2031, respectively. Therefore, random forest regression (RFR) and support vector regression (SVR) can be given priority to predict poplar flood resistance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8874143/ /pubmed/35222479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.821365 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xie, Zhang, Shen and Du. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Xie, Xuelin
Zhang, Xinye
Shen, Jingfang
Du, Kebing
Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science
title Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science
title_full Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science
title_fullStr Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science
title_full_unstemmed Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science
title_short Poplar’s Waterlogging Resistance Modeling and Evaluating: Exploring and Perfecting the Feasibility of Machine Learning Methods in Plant Science
title_sort poplar’s waterlogging resistance modeling and evaluating: exploring and perfecting the feasibility of machine learning methods in plant science
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35222479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.821365
work_keys_str_mv AT xiexuelin poplarswaterloggingresistancemodelingandevaluatingexploringandperfectingthefeasibilityofmachinelearningmethodsinplantscience
AT zhangxinye poplarswaterloggingresistancemodelingandevaluatingexploringandperfectingthefeasibilityofmachinelearningmethodsinplantscience
AT shenjingfang poplarswaterloggingresistancemodelingandevaluatingexploringandperfectingthefeasibilityofmachinelearningmethodsinplantscience
AT dukebing poplarswaterloggingresistancemodelingandevaluatingexploringandperfectingthefeasibilityofmachinelearningmethodsinplantscience