Cargando…

A scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: A review protocol

BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation is an emerging segment of telehealth and telemedicine that has a potential to deliver quality, accessible, cost-effective and efficient rehabilitation services where geographical distance is a critical factor. The objectives of this review are: to describe the feasibil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nizeyimana, Eugene, Joseph, Conran, Louw, Quinette A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211066708
_version_ 1784657621124382720
author Nizeyimana, Eugene
Joseph, Conran
Louw, Quinette A
author_facet Nizeyimana, Eugene
Joseph, Conran
Louw, Quinette A
author_sort Nizeyimana, Eugene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation is an emerging segment of telehealth and telemedicine that has a potential to deliver quality, accessible, cost-effective and efficient rehabilitation services where geographical distance is a critical factor. The objectives of this review are: to describe the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation, to scope to what extent telerehabilitation has the potential impact on access to quality of rehabilitation services with specific references to low to middle income countries, and to understand key process factors including barriers and facilitators relevant to the implementation of telerehabilitation. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature will be conducted. An electronic search literature will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, Africa-wide information, CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Web of science and reference lists. The review team will develop a data charting form and pilot it on four randomly-selected studies. The form will be refined based on the results of the piloted articles. Studies identified will be screened at the title and abstract levels by the first reviewer, followed by an independent verification for the accuracy and eligibility by two more reviewers prior to obtaining the full texts. Studies to be included must report on feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to rehabilitation services, implementation process factors including barriers and facilitators of telerehabilitation. The analysis will include both descriptive summary and inductive thematic analysis. CONCLUSION: Telerehabilitation has ability to change the current standard of care and allow for improved access and health outcomes in cost-effective ways, while addressing the scarce and unequal distribution of limited number of healthcare providers especially in low to middle income country settings. Thus, the research findings could be used by different stakeholders including: researchers, clinicians, policy makers, and implementation teams as they determine the appropriate setup for new telerehabilitation programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8874157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88741572022-02-26 A scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: A review protocol Nizeyimana, Eugene Joseph, Conran Louw, Quinette A Digit Health Review Article BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation is an emerging segment of telehealth and telemedicine that has a potential to deliver quality, accessible, cost-effective and efficient rehabilitation services where geographical distance is a critical factor. The objectives of this review are: to describe the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation, to scope to what extent telerehabilitation has the potential impact on access to quality of rehabilitation services with specific references to low to middle income countries, and to understand key process factors including barriers and facilitators relevant to the implementation of telerehabilitation. METHODS: A scoping review of the literature will be conducted. An electronic search literature will be conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, Africa-wide information, CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Web of science and reference lists. The review team will develop a data charting form and pilot it on four randomly-selected studies. The form will be refined based on the results of the piloted articles. Studies identified will be screened at the title and abstract levels by the first reviewer, followed by an independent verification for the accuracy and eligibility by two more reviewers prior to obtaining the full texts. Studies to be included must report on feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to rehabilitation services, implementation process factors including barriers and facilitators of telerehabilitation. The analysis will include both descriptive summary and inductive thematic analysis. CONCLUSION: Telerehabilitation has ability to change the current standard of care and allow for improved access and health outcomes in cost-effective ways, while addressing the scarce and unequal distribution of limited number of healthcare providers especially in low to middle income country settings. Thus, the research findings could be used by different stakeholders including: researchers, clinicians, policy makers, and implementation teams as they determine the appropriate setup for new telerehabilitation programs. SAGE Publications 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8874157/ /pubmed/35223074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211066708 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Article
Nizeyimana, Eugene
Joseph, Conran
Louw, Quinette A
A scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: A review protocol
title A scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: A review protocol
title_full A scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: A review protocol
title_fullStr A scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: A review protocol
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: A review protocol
title_short A scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: A review protocol
title_sort scoping review of feasibility, cost-effectiveness, access to quality rehabilitation services and impact of telerehabilitation: a review protocol
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35223074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076211066708
work_keys_str_mv AT nizeyimanaeugene ascopingreviewoffeasibilitycosteffectivenessaccesstoqualityrehabilitationservicesandimpactoftelerehabilitationareviewprotocol
AT josephconran ascopingreviewoffeasibilitycosteffectivenessaccesstoqualityrehabilitationservicesandimpactoftelerehabilitationareviewprotocol
AT louwquinettea ascopingreviewoffeasibilitycosteffectivenessaccesstoqualityrehabilitationservicesandimpactoftelerehabilitationareviewprotocol
AT nizeyimanaeugene scopingreviewoffeasibilitycosteffectivenessaccesstoqualityrehabilitationservicesandimpactoftelerehabilitationareviewprotocol
AT josephconran scopingreviewoffeasibilitycosteffectivenessaccesstoqualityrehabilitationservicesandimpactoftelerehabilitationareviewprotocol
AT louwquinettea scopingreviewoffeasibilitycosteffectivenessaccesstoqualityrehabilitationservicesandimpactoftelerehabilitationareviewprotocol