Cargando…

PEGylated versus Non-PEGylated pH-Sensitive Liposomes: New Insights from a Comparative Antitumor Activity Study

PEGylated liposomes are largely studied as long-circulating drug delivery systems. Nevertheless, the addition of PEG can result in reduced interactions between liposomes and cells, hindering liposomal internalization into target cells. The presence of PEG on the surface of pH-sensitive liposomes is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunes, Shirleide Santos, de Oliveira Silva, Juliana, Fernandes, Renata Salgado, Miranda, Sued Eustaquio Mendes, Leite, Elaine Amaral, de Farias, Marcelo Alexandre, Portugal, Rodrigo Villares, Cassali, Geovanni Dantas, Townsend, Danyelle M., Oliveira, Mônica Cristina, de Barros, André Luís Branco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020272
_version_ 1784657717689843712
author Nunes, Shirleide Santos
de Oliveira Silva, Juliana
Fernandes, Renata Salgado
Miranda, Sued Eustaquio Mendes
Leite, Elaine Amaral
de Farias, Marcelo Alexandre
Portugal, Rodrigo Villares
Cassali, Geovanni Dantas
Townsend, Danyelle M.
Oliveira, Mônica Cristina
de Barros, André Luís Branco
author_facet Nunes, Shirleide Santos
de Oliveira Silva, Juliana
Fernandes, Renata Salgado
Miranda, Sued Eustaquio Mendes
Leite, Elaine Amaral
de Farias, Marcelo Alexandre
Portugal, Rodrigo Villares
Cassali, Geovanni Dantas
Townsend, Danyelle M.
Oliveira, Mônica Cristina
de Barros, André Luís Branco
author_sort Nunes, Shirleide Santos
collection PubMed
description PEGylated liposomes are largely studied as long-circulating drug delivery systems. Nevertheless, the addition of PEG can result in reduced interactions between liposomes and cells, hindering liposomal internalization into target cells. The presence of PEG on the surface of pH-sensitive liposomes is not advantageous in terms of biodistribution and tumor uptake, raising the question of whether the indiscriminate use of PEG benefits the formulation. In this study, two doxorubicin-loaded pH-sensitive liposomal formulations, PEGylated (Lip2000-DOX) or non-PEGylated (Lip-DOX), were prepared and characterized. Overall, the PEGylated and non-PEGylated liposomes showed no differences in size or morphology in Cryo-TEM image analysis. Specifically, DLS analysis showed a mean diameter of 140 nm, PDI lower than 0.2, and zeta potential close to neutrality. Both formulations showed an EP higher than 90%. With respect to drug delivery, Lip-DOX had better cellular uptake than Lip(2000)-DOX, suggesting that the presence of PEG reduced the amount of intracellular DOX accumulation. The antitumor activities of free-DOX and both liposomal formulations were evaluated in 4T1 breast tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. The results showed that Lip-DOX was more effective in controlling tumor growth than other groups, inhibiting tumor growth by 60.4%. Histological lung analysis confirmed that none of the animals in the Lip-DOX group had metastatic foci. These results support that pH-sensitive liposomes have interesting antitumor properties and may produce important outcomes without PEG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8874560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88745602022-02-26 PEGylated versus Non-PEGylated pH-Sensitive Liposomes: New Insights from a Comparative Antitumor Activity Study Nunes, Shirleide Santos de Oliveira Silva, Juliana Fernandes, Renata Salgado Miranda, Sued Eustaquio Mendes Leite, Elaine Amaral de Farias, Marcelo Alexandre Portugal, Rodrigo Villares Cassali, Geovanni Dantas Townsend, Danyelle M. Oliveira, Mônica Cristina de Barros, André Luís Branco Pharmaceutics Article PEGylated liposomes are largely studied as long-circulating drug delivery systems. Nevertheless, the addition of PEG can result in reduced interactions between liposomes and cells, hindering liposomal internalization into target cells. The presence of PEG on the surface of pH-sensitive liposomes is not advantageous in terms of biodistribution and tumor uptake, raising the question of whether the indiscriminate use of PEG benefits the formulation. In this study, two doxorubicin-loaded pH-sensitive liposomal formulations, PEGylated (Lip2000-DOX) or non-PEGylated (Lip-DOX), were prepared and characterized. Overall, the PEGylated and non-PEGylated liposomes showed no differences in size or morphology in Cryo-TEM image analysis. Specifically, DLS analysis showed a mean diameter of 140 nm, PDI lower than 0.2, and zeta potential close to neutrality. Both formulations showed an EP higher than 90%. With respect to drug delivery, Lip-DOX had better cellular uptake than Lip(2000)-DOX, suggesting that the presence of PEG reduced the amount of intracellular DOX accumulation. The antitumor activities of free-DOX and both liposomal formulations were evaluated in 4T1 breast tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. The results showed that Lip-DOX was more effective in controlling tumor growth than other groups, inhibiting tumor growth by 60.4%. Histological lung analysis confirmed that none of the animals in the Lip-DOX group had metastatic foci. These results support that pH-sensitive liposomes have interesting antitumor properties and may produce important outcomes without PEG. MDPI 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8874560/ /pubmed/35214005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020272 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nunes, Shirleide Santos
de Oliveira Silva, Juliana
Fernandes, Renata Salgado
Miranda, Sued Eustaquio Mendes
Leite, Elaine Amaral
de Farias, Marcelo Alexandre
Portugal, Rodrigo Villares
Cassali, Geovanni Dantas
Townsend, Danyelle M.
Oliveira, Mônica Cristina
de Barros, André Luís Branco
PEGylated versus Non-PEGylated pH-Sensitive Liposomes: New Insights from a Comparative Antitumor Activity Study
title PEGylated versus Non-PEGylated pH-Sensitive Liposomes: New Insights from a Comparative Antitumor Activity Study
title_full PEGylated versus Non-PEGylated pH-Sensitive Liposomes: New Insights from a Comparative Antitumor Activity Study
title_fullStr PEGylated versus Non-PEGylated pH-Sensitive Liposomes: New Insights from a Comparative Antitumor Activity Study
title_full_unstemmed PEGylated versus Non-PEGylated pH-Sensitive Liposomes: New Insights from a Comparative Antitumor Activity Study
title_short PEGylated versus Non-PEGylated pH-Sensitive Liposomes: New Insights from a Comparative Antitumor Activity Study
title_sort pegylated versus non-pegylated ph-sensitive liposomes: new insights from a comparative antitumor activity study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35214005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14020272
work_keys_str_mv AT nunesshirleidesantos pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT deoliveirasilvajuliana pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT fernandesrenatasalgado pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT mirandasuedeustaquiomendes pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT leiteelaineamaral pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT defariasmarceloalexandre pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT portugalrodrigovillares pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT cassaligeovannidantas pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT townsenddanyellem pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT oliveiramonicacristina pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy
AT debarrosandreluisbranco pegylatedversusnonpegylatedphsensitiveliposomesnewinsightsfromacomparativeantitumoractivitystudy