Cargando…

Diagnostic Considerations for Non-Acanthamoeba Amoebic Keratitis and Clinical Outcomes

Cases of amoebic keratitis involving species other than Acanthamoeba are hypothesised to be underdiagnosed and poorly understood. Amoebic keratitis is debilitating and associated with chronic visual impairment. Understanding associated symptoms of non-Acanthamoeba amoebic keratitis could facilitate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moran, Siobhan, Mooney, Ronnie, Henriquez, Fiona L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020219
_version_ 1784657742953185280
author Moran, Siobhan
Mooney, Ronnie
Henriquez, Fiona L.
author_facet Moran, Siobhan
Mooney, Ronnie
Henriquez, Fiona L.
author_sort Moran, Siobhan
collection PubMed
description Cases of amoebic keratitis involving species other than Acanthamoeba are hypothesised to be underdiagnosed and poorly understood. Amoebic keratitis is debilitating and associated with chronic visual impairment. Understanding associated symptoms of non-Acanthamoeba amoebic keratitis could facilitate new diagnostic procedures and enable prompt treatment, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Thus, a review of the literature was undertaken surrounding non-Acanthamoeba amoebic keratitis. Cases were geographically widespread and mostly confined to contact lens wearers ≤ 30 years old exposed to contaminated water sources and/or demonstrating poor lens hygiene. Vermamoeba vermiformis (previously Hartmanella vermiformis) was the most common causative agent, and a moderate number of mixed keratitis cases were also reported. A crucial disease indicator was early onset stromal deterioration/ulcerations, reported in 10 of the studies, usually only occurring in advanced Acanthamoeba keratitis. Mixed infections were the most difficult to treat, often requiring keratoplasty after unsuccessful combination treatment regimens. New diagnostic measures for non-Acanthamoeba amoebic keratitis should consider early onset stromal disease as a key disease indicator. Deep corneal scrapes are also necessary for accurate amoebic identification. Moreover, a combination approach to diagnosis is advised and should involve culture, microscopy and PCR techniques. In vitro drug sensitivity tests should also be conducted to help develop patient-specific treatment regimes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8874664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88746642022-02-26 Diagnostic Considerations for Non-Acanthamoeba Amoebic Keratitis and Clinical Outcomes Moran, Siobhan Mooney, Ronnie Henriquez, Fiona L. Pathogens Systematic Review Cases of amoebic keratitis involving species other than Acanthamoeba are hypothesised to be underdiagnosed and poorly understood. Amoebic keratitis is debilitating and associated with chronic visual impairment. Understanding associated symptoms of non-Acanthamoeba amoebic keratitis could facilitate new diagnostic procedures and enable prompt treatment, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. Thus, a review of the literature was undertaken surrounding non-Acanthamoeba amoebic keratitis. Cases were geographically widespread and mostly confined to contact lens wearers ≤ 30 years old exposed to contaminated water sources and/or demonstrating poor lens hygiene. Vermamoeba vermiformis (previously Hartmanella vermiformis) was the most common causative agent, and a moderate number of mixed keratitis cases were also reported. A crucial disease indicator was early onset stromal deterioration/ulcerations, reported in 10 of the studies, usually only occurring in advanced Acanthamoeba keratitis. Mixed infections were the most difficult to treat, often requiring keratoplasty after unsuccessful combination treatment regimens. New diagnostic measures for non-Acanthamoeba amoebic keratitis should consider early onset stromal disease as a key disease indicator. Deep corneal scrapes are also necessary for accurate amoebic identification. Moreover, a combination approach to diagnosis is advised and should involve culture, microscopy and PCR techniques. In vitro drug sensitivity tests should also be conducted to help develop patient-specific treatment regimes. MDPI 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8874664/ /pubmed/35215164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020219 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Moran, Siobhan
Mooney, Ronnie
Henriquez, Fiona L.
Diagnostic Considerations for Non-Acanthamoeba Amoebic Keratitis and Clinical Outcomes
title Diagnostic Considerations for Non-Acanthamoeba Amoebic Keratitis and Clinical Outcomes
title_full Diagnostic Considerations for Non-Acanthamoeba Amoebic Keratitis and Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr Diagnostic Considerations for Non-Acanthamoeba Amoebic Keratitis and Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Considerations for Non-Acanthamoeba Amoebic Keratitis and Clinical Outcomes
title_short Diagnostic Considerations for Non-Acanthamoeba Amoebic Keratitis and Clinical Outcomes
title_sort diagnostic considerations for non-acanthamoeba amoebic keratitis and clinical outcomes
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8874664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020219
work_keys_str_mv AT moransiobhan diagnosticconsiderationsfornonacanthamoebaamoebickeratitisandclinicaloutcomes
AT mooneyronnie diagnosticconsiderationsfornonacanthamoebaamoebickeratitisandclinicaloutcomes
AT henriquezfional diagnosticconsiderationsfornonacanthamoebaamoebickeratitisandclinicaloutcomes