Cargando…
Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study
In single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS), the transport efficiency is fundamental for the correct determination of both particle number concentration and size. In the present study, transport efficiency was systematically determined on three different days with six...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12040725 |
_version_ | 1784657824031178752 |
---|---|
author | Geiss, Otmar Bianchi, Ivana Bucher, Guillaume Verleysen, Eveline Brassinne, Frédéric Mast, Jan Loeschner, Katrin Givelet, Lucas Cubadda, Francesco Ferraris, Francesca Raggi, Andrea Iacoponi, Francesca Peters, Ruud Undas, Anna Müller, Alexandra Meinhardt, Ann-Katrin Hetzer, Birgit Gräf, Volker Montoro Bustos, Antonio R. Barrero-Moreno, Josefa |
author_facet | Geiss, Otmar Bianchi, Ivana Bucher, Guillaume Verleysen, Eveline Brassinne, Frédéric Mast, Jan Loeschner, Katrin Givelet, Lucas Cubadda, Francesco Ferraris, Francesca Raggi, Andrea Iacoponi, Francesca Peters, Ruud Undas, Anna Müller, Alexandra Meinhardt, Ann-Katrin Hetzer, Birgit Gräf, Volker Montoro Bustos, Antonio R. Barrero-Moreno, Josefa |
author_sort | Geiss, Otmar |
collection | PubMed |
description | In single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS), the transport efficiency is fundamental for the correct determination of both particle number concentration and size. In the present study, transport efficiency was systematically determined on three different days with six carefully characterised gold nanoparticle (AuNP) suspensions and in seven European and US expert laboratories using different ICP-MS instruments and spICP-MS software. Both particle size—(TES)—and particle frequency—(TEF)—methods were applied. The resulting transport efficiencies did not deviate much under ideal conditions. The TEF method however systematically resulted in lower transport efficiencies. The extent of this difference (0–300% rel. difference) depended largely on the choice and storage conditions of the nanoparticle suspensions used for the determination. The TES method is recommended when the principal measurement objective is particle size. If the main aim of the measurement is the determination of the particle number concentration, the TEF approach could be preferred as it might better account for particle losses in the sample introduction system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8875013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88750132022-02-26 Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study Geiss, Otmar Bianchi, Ivana Bucher, Guillaume Verleysen, Eveline Brassinne, Frédéric Mast, Jan Loeschner, Katrin Givelet, Lucas Cubadda, Francesco Ferraris, Francesca Raggi, Andrea Iacoponi, Francesca Peters, Ruud Undas, Anna Müller, Alexandra Meinhardt, Ann-Katrin Hetzer, Birgit Gräf, Volker Montoro Bustos, Antonio R. Barrero-Moreno, Josefa Nanomaterials (Basel) Article In single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS), the transport efficiency is fundamental for the correct determination of both particle number concentration and size. In the present study, transport efficiency was systematically determined on three different days with six carefully characterised gold nanoparticle (AuNP) suspensions and in seven European and US expert laboratories using different ICP-MS instruments and spICP-MS software. Both particle size—(TES)—and particle frequency—(TEF)—methods were applied. The resulting transport efficiencies did not deviate much under ideal conditions. The TEF method however systematically resulted in lower transport efficiencies. The extent of this difference (0–300% rel. difference) depended largely on the choice and storage conditions of the nanoparticle suspensions used for the determination. The TES method is recommended when the principal measurement objective is particle size. If the main aim of the measurement is the determination of the particle number concentration, the TEF approach could be preferred as it might better account for particle losses in the sample introduction system. MDPI 2022-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8875013/ /pubmed/35215053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12040725 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Geiss, Otmar Bianchi, Ivana Bucher, Guillaume Verleysen, Eveline Brassinne, Frédéric Mast, Jan Loeschner, Katrin Givelet, Lucas Cubadda, Francesco Ferraris, Francesca Raggi, Andrea Iacoponi, Francesca Peters, Ruud Undas, Anna Müller, Alexandra Meinhardt, Ann-Katrin Hetzer, Birgit Gräf, Volker Montoro Bustos, Antonio R. Barrero-Moreno, Josefa Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study |
title | Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study |
title_full | Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study |
title_fullStr | Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study |
title_short | Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study |
title_sort | determination of the transport efficiency in spicp-ms analysis using conventional sample introduction systems: an interlaboratory comparison study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano12040725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geissotmar determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT bianchiivana determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT bucherguillaume determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT verleyseneveline determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT brassinnefrederic determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT mastjan determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT loeschnerkatrin determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT giveletlucas determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT cubaddafrancesco determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT ferrarisfrancesca determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT raggiandrea determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT iacoponifrancesca determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT petersruud determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT undasanna determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT mulleralexandra determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT meinhardtannkatrin determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT hetzerbirgit determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT grafvolker determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT montorobustosantonior determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy AT barreromorenojosefa determinationofthetransportefficiencyinspicpmsanalysisusingconventionalsampleintroductionsystemsaninterlaboratorycomparisonstudy |