Cargando…

Evaluation of Serological Methods and a New Real-Time Nested PCR for Small Ruminant Lentiviruses

Small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLVs), i.e., CAEV and MVV, cause insidious infections with life-long persistence and a slowly progressive disease, impairing both animal welfare and productivity in affected herds. The complex diagnosis of SRLVs currently combines serological methods including whole-vir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaer, Jessica, Cvetnic, Zeljko, Sukalic, Tomislav, Dörig, Sven, Grisiger, Martin, Iscaro, Carmen, Feliziani, Francesco, Pfeifer, Folke, Origgi, Francesco, Zanoni, Reto Giacomo, Abril, Carlos Eduardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020129
_version_ 1784657854314053632
author Schaer, Jessica
Cvetnic, Zeljko
Sukalic, Tomislav
Dörig, Sven
Grisiger, Martin
Iscaro, Carmen
Feliziani, Francesco
Pfeifer, Folke
Origgi, Francesco
Zanoni, Reto Giacomo
Abril, Carlos Eduardo
author_facet Schaer, Jessica
Cvetnic, Zeljko
Sukalic, Tomislav
Dörig, Sven
Grisiger, Martin
Iscaro, Carmen
Feliziani, Francesco
Pfeifer, Folke
Origgi, Francesco
Zanoni, Reto Giacomo
Abril, Carlos Eduardo
author_sort Schaer, Jessica
collection PubMed
description Small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLVs), i.e., CAEV and MVV, cause insidious infections with life-long persistence and a slowly progressive disease, impairing both animal welfare and productivity in affected herds. The complex diagnosis of SRLVs currently combines serological methods including whole-virus and peptide-based ELISAs and Immunoblot. To improve the current diagnostic protocol, we analyzed 290 sera of animals originating from different European countries in parallel with three commercial screening ELISAs, Immunoblot as a confirmatory assay and five SU5 peptide ELISAs for genotype differentiation. A newly developed nested real-time PCR was carried out for the detection and genotype differentiation of the virus. Using a heat-map display of the combined results, the drawbacks of the current techniques were graphically visualized and quantified. The immunoblot and the SU5-ELISAs exhibited either unsatisfactory sensitivity or insufficient reliability in the differentiation of the causative viral genotype, respectively. The new truth standard was the concordance of the results of two out of three screening ELISAs and the PCR results for serologically false negative samples along with genotype differentiation. Whole-virus antigen-based ELISA showed the highest sensitivity (92.2%) and specificity (98.9%) among the screening tests, whereas PCR exhibited a sensitivity of 75%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8875174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88751742022-02-26 Evaluation of Serological Methods and a New Real-Time Nested PCR for Small Ruminant Lentiviruses Schaer, Jessica Cvetnic, Zeljko Sukalic, Tomislav Dörig, Sven Grisiger, Martin Iscaro, Carmen Feliziani, Francesco Pfeifer, Folke Origgi, Francesco Zanoni, Reto Giacomo Abril, Carlos Eduardo Pathogens Article Small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLVs), i.e., CAEV and MVV, cause insidious infections with life-long persistence and a slowly progressive disease, impairing both animal welfare and productivity in affected herds. The complex diagnosis of SRLVs currently combines serological methods including whole-virus and peptide-based ELISAs and Immunoblot. To improve the current diagnostic protocol, we analyzed 290 sera of animals originating from different European countries in parallel with three commercial screening ELISAs, Immunoblot as a confirmatory assay and five SU5 peptide ELISAs for genotype differentiation. A newly developed nested real-time PCR was carried out for the detection and genotype differentiation of the virus. Using a heat-map display of the combined results, the drawbacks of the current techniques were graphically visualized and quantified. The immunoblot and the SU5-ELISAs exhibited either unsatisfactory sensitivity or insufficient reliability in the differentiation of the causative viral genotype, respectively. The new truth standard was the concordance of the results of two out of three screening ELISAs and the PCR results for serologically false negative samples along with genotype differentiation. Whole-virus antigen-based ELISA showed the highest sensitivity (92.2%) and specificity (98.9%) among the screening tests, whereas PCR exhibited a sensitivity of 75%. MDPI 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8875174/ /pubmed/35215072 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020129 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schaer, Jessica
Cvetnic, Zeljko
Sukalic, Tomislav
Dörig, Sven
Grisiger, Martin
Iscaro, Carmen
Feliziani, Francesco
Pfeifer, Folke
Origgi, Francesco
Zanoni, Reto Giacomo
Abril, Carlos Eduardo
Evaluation of Serological Methods and a New Real-Time Nested PCR for Small Ruminant Lentiviruses
title Evaluation of Serological Methods and a New Real-Time Nested PCR for Small Ruminant Lentiviruses
title_full Evaluation of Serological Methods and a New Real-Time Nested PCR for Small Ruminant Lentiviruses
title_fullStr Evaluation of Serological Methods and a New Real-Time Nested PCR for Small Ruminant Lentiviruses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Serological Methods and a New Real-Time Nested PCR for Small Ruminant Lentiviruses
title_short Evaluation of Serological Methods and a New Real-Time Nested PCR for Small Ruminant Lentiviruses
title_sort evaluation of serological methods and a new real-time nested pcr for small ruminant lentiviruses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35215072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020129
work_keys_str_mv AT schaerjessica evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT cvetniczeljko evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT sukalictomislav evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT dorigsven evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT grisigermartin evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT iscarocarmen evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT felizianifrancesco evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT pfeiferfolke evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT origgifrancesco evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT zanoniretogiacomo evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses
AT abrilcarloseduardo evaluationofserologicalmethodsandanewrealtimenestedpcrforsmallruminantlentiviruses