Cargando…

Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid

The tear film is a multi-layer fluid that covers the corneal and conjunctival epithelia of the eye and provides lubrication, nutrients, and protection from the outside environment. Tear fluid contains a high concentration of proteins and has thus been recognized as a potential source of biomarkers f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Garrett, Lee, Tae Jin, Glass, Joshua, Rountree, Grace, Ulrich, Lane, Estes, Amy, Sezer, Mary, Zhi, Wenbo, Sharma, Shruti, Sharma, Ashok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042307
_version_ 1784657921358954496
author Jones, Garrett
Lee, Tae Jin
Glass, Joshua
Rountree, Grace
Ulrich, Lane
Estes, Amy
Sezer, Mary
Zhi, Wenbo
Sharma, Shruti
Sharma, Ashok
author_facet Jones, Garrett
Lee, Tae Jin
Glass, Joshua
Rountree, Grace
Ulrich, Lane
Estes, Amy
Sezer, Mary
Zhi, Wenbo
Sharma, Shruti
Sharma, Ashok
author_sort Jones, Garrett
collection PubMed
description The tear film is a multi-layer fluid that covers the corneal and conjunctival epithelia of the eye and provides lubrication, nutrients, and protection from the outside environment. Tear fluid contains a high concentration of proteins and has thus been recognized as a potential source of biomarkers for ocular disorders due to its proximity to disease sites on the ocular surface and the non-invasive nature of its collection. This is particularly true in the case of dry eye disease, which directly impacts the tear film and its components. Proteomic analysis of tear fluid is challenging mainly due to the wide dynamic range of proteins and the small sample volumes. However, recent advancements in mass spectrometry have revolutionized the field of proteomics enabling unprecedented depth, speed, and accuracy, even with small sample volumes. In this study using the Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer, we compared four different mass spectrometry workflows for the proteomic analysis of tear fluid collected via Schirmer strips. We were able to establish a method of in-strip protein digestion that identified >3000 proteins in human tear samples from 11 healthy subjects. Our method offers a significant improvement in the number of proteins identified compared to previously reported methods without pooling samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8875482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88754822022-02-26 Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid Jones, Garrett Lee, Tae Jin Glass, Joshua Rountree, Grace Ulrich, Lane Estes, Amy Sezer, Mary Zhi, Wenbo Sharma, Shruti Sharma, Ashok Int J Mol Sci Article The tear film is a multi-layer fluid that covers the corneal and conjunctival epithelia of the eye and provides lubrication, nutrients, and protection from the outside environment. Tear fluid contains a high concentration of proteins and has thus been recognized as a potential source of biomarkers for ocular disorders due to its proximity to disease sites on the ocular surface and the non-invasive nature of its collection. This is particularly true in the case of dry eye disease, which directly impacts the tear film and its components. Proteomic analysis of tear fluid is challenging mainly due to the wide dynamic range of proteins and the small sample volumes. However, recent advancements in mass spectrometry have revolutionized the field of proteomics enabling unprecedented depth, speed, and accuracy, even with small sample volumes. In this study using the Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer, we compared four different mass spectrometry workflows for the proteomic analysis of tear fluid collected via Schirmer strips. We were able to establish a method of in-strip protein digestion that identified >3000 proteins in human tear samples from 11 healthy subjects. Our method offers a significant improvement in the number of proteins identified compared to previously reported methods without pooling samples. MDPI 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8875482/ /pubmed/35216421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042307 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jones, Garrett
Lee, Tae Jin
Glass, Joshua
Rountree, Grace
Ulrich, Lane
Estes, Amy
Sezer, Mary
Zhi, Wenbo
Sharma, Shruti
Sharma, Ashok
Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid
title Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid
title_full Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid
title_short Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid
title_sort comparison of different mass spectrometry workflows for the proteomic analysis of tear fluid
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042307
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesgarrett comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT leetaejin comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT glassjoshua comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT rountreegrace comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT ulrichlane comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT estesamy comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT sezermary comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT zhiwenbo comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT sharmashruti comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid
AT sharmaashok comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid