Cargando…
Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid
The tear film is a multi-layer fluid that covers the corneal and conjunctival epithelia of the eye and provides lubrication, nutrients, and protection from the outside environment. Tear fluid contains a high concentration of proteins and has thus been recognized as a potential source of biomarkers f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042307 |
_version_ | 1784657921358954496 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Garrett Lee, Tae Jin Glass, Joshua Rountree, Grace Ulrich, Lane Estes, Amy Sezer, Mary Zhi, Wenbo Sharma, Shruti Sharma, Ashok |
author_facet | Jones, Garrett Lee, Tae Jin Glass, Joshua Rountree, Grace Ulrich, Lane Estes, Amy Sezer, Mary Zhi, Wenbo Sharma, Shruti Sharma, Ashok |
author_sort | Jones, Garrett |
collection | PubMed |
description | The tear film is a multi-layer fluid that covers the corneal and conjunctival epithelia of the eye and provides lubrication, nutrients, and protection from the outside environment. Tear fluid contains a high concentration of proteins and has thus been recognized as a potential source of biomarkers for ocular disorders due to its proximity to disease sites on the ocular surface and the non-invasive nature of its collection. This is particularly true in the case of dry eye disease, which directly impacts the tear film and its components. Proteomic analysis of tear fluid is challenging mainly due to the wide dynamic range of proteins and the small sample volumes. However, recent advancements in mass spectrometry have revolutionized the field of proteomics enabling unprecedented depth, speed, and accuracy, even with small sample volumes. In this study using the Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer, we compared four different mass spectrometry workflows for the proteomic analysis of tear fluid collected via Schirmer strips. We were able to establish a method of in-strip protein digestion that identified >3000 proteins in human tear samples from 11 healthy subjects. Our method offers a significant improvement in the number of proteins identified compared to previously reported methods without pooling samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8875482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88754822022-02-26 Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid Jones, Garrett Lee, Tae Jin Glass, Joshua Rountree, Grace Ulrich, Lane Estes, Amy Sezer, Mary Zhi, Wenbo Sharma, Shruti Sharma, Ashok Int J Mol Sci Article The tear film is a multi-layer fluid that covers the corneal and conjunctival epithelia of the eye and provides lubrication, nutrients, and protection from the outside environment. Tear fluid contains a high concentration of proteins and has thus been recognized as a potential source of biomarkers for ocular disorders due to its proximity to disease sites on the ocular surface and the non-invasive nature of its collection. This is particularly true in the case of dry eye disease, which directly impacts the tear film and its components. Proteomic analysis of tear fluid is challenging mainly due to the wide dynamic range of proteins and the small sample volumes. However, recent advancements in mass spectrometry have revolutionized the field of proteomics enabling unprecedented depth, speed, and accuracy, even with small sample volumes. In this study using the Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer, we compared four different mass spectrometry workflows for the proteomic analysis of tear fluid collected via Schirmer strips. We were able to establish a method of in-strip protein digestion that identified >3000 proteins in human tear samples from 11 healthy subjects. Our method offers a significant improvement in the number of proteins identified compared to previously reported methods without pooling samples. MDPI 2022-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8875482/ /pubmed/35216421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042307 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Jones, Garrett Lee, Tae Jin Glass, Joshua Rountree, Grace Ulrich, Lane Estes, Amy Sezer, Mary Zhi, Wenbo Sharma, Shruti Sharma, Ashok Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid |
title | Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid |
title_full | Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid |
title_short | Comparison of Different Mass Spectrometry Workflows for the Proteomic Analysis of Tear Fluid |
title_sort | comparison of different mass spectrometry workflows for the proteomic analysis of tear fluid |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesgarrett comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT leetaejin comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT glassjoshua comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT rountreegrace comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT ulrichlane comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT estesamy comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT sezermary comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT zhiwenbo comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT sharmashruti comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid AT sharmaashok comparisonofdifferentmassspectrometryworkflowsfortheproteomicanalysisoftearfluid |