Cargando…

Kinetics and Dynamics of the Stiff and Flexible Tines with the Duckfoot and the Coulter after Impact with Stones Embedded in Compacted Soil. Part II

The kinetics and dynamics of the stiff and flexible tines with the duckfoot and the coulter after impact with stones embedded in compacted soil were examined. The beak of the duckfoot was positioned in the axis of the row of stones embedded in the soil at the depth of stones thickness. The coulter c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lisowski, Aleksander, Świętochowski, Adam, Dąbrowska, Magdalena, Klonowski, Jacek, Nowakowski, Tomasz, Chlebowski, Jarosław, Ferré, Samuel, Roberge, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207892
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041351
_version_ 1784657980538486784
author Lisowski, Aleksander
Świętochowski, Adam
Dąbrowska, Magdalena
Klonowski, Jacek
Nowakowski, Tomasz
Chlebowski, Jarosław
Ferré, Samuel
Roberge, Martin
author_facet Lisowski, Aleksander
Świętochowski, Adam
Dąbrowska, Magdalena
Klonowski, Jacek
Nowakowski, Tomasz
Chlebowski, Jarosław
Ferré, Samuel
Roberge, Martin
author_sort Lisowski, Aleksander
collection PubMed
description The kinetics and dynamics of the stiff and flexible tines with the duckfoot and the coulter after impact with stones embedded in compacted soil were examined. The beak of the duckfoot was positioned in the axis of the row of stones embedded in the soil at the depth of stones thickness. The coulter covered the stone or impact the edge of the stone halfway along its length. The tools worked at a speed of 0.83–2.22 m·s(−1) and a working depth of 0.05–0.10 m. The results of specific parameters were compared to the response of the tools to loads in soil without stones. For both soil conditions, the kinetics of the flexible tine was 24 times more reactive, and the dynamic loads were two times lower than for the stiff tine. The responses of both tines were suppressed along with the working depth because of the more favorable place of impact of the duckfoot beak with the stone. Along with the working speed, for a stiff tine, the specific accelerations decreased significantly, by ten times, and the specific forces increased slightly, by 1.6 times. Among the two systems of setting the coulter, the impact of the cutting edge of the coulter with the stone in the middle of its length was more unfavorable than the work of the coulter covering the stone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8875634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88756342022-02-26 Kinetics and Dynamics of the Stiff and Flexible Tines with the Duckfoot and the Coulter after Impact with Stones Embedded in Compacted Soil. Part II Lisowski, Aleksander Świętochowski, Adam Dąbrowska, Magdalena Klonowski, Jacek Nowakowski, Tomasz Chlebowski, Jarosław Ferré, Samuel Roberge, Martin Materials (Basel) Article The kinetics and dynamics of the stiff and flexible tines with the duckfoot and the coulter after impact with stones embedded in compacted soil were examined. The beak of the duckfoot was positioned in the axis of the row of stones embedded in the soil at the depth of stones thickness. The coulter covered the stone or impact the edge of the stone halfway along its length. The tools worked at a speed of 0.83–2.22 m·s(−1) and a working depth of 0.05–0.10 m. The results of specific parameters were compared to the response of the tools to loads in soil without stones. For both soil conditions, the kinetics of the flexible tine was 24 times more reactive, and the dynamic loads were two times lower than for the stiff tine. The responses of both tines were suppressed along with the working depth because of the more favorable place of impact of the duckfoot beak with the stone. Along with the working speed, for a stiff tine, the specific accelerations decreased significantly, by ten times, and the specific forces increased slightly, by 1.6 times. Among the two systems of setting the coulter, the impact of the cutting edge of the coulter with the stone in the middle of its length was more unfavorable than the work of the coulter covering the stone. MDPI 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8875634/ /pubmed/35207892 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041351 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lisowski, Aleksander
Świętochowski, Adam
Dąbrowska, Magdalena
Klonowski, Jacek
Nowakowski, Tomasz
Chlebowski, Jarosław
Ferré, Samuel
Roberge, Martin
Kinetics and Dynamics of the Stiff and Flexible Tines with the Duckfoot and the Coulter after Impact with Stones Embedded in Compacted Soil. Part II
title Kinetics and Dynamics of the Stiff and Flexible Tines with the Duckfoot and the Coulter after Impact with Stones Embedded in Compacted Soil. Part II
title_full Kinetics and Dynamics of the Stiff and Flexible Tines with the Duckfoot and the Coulter after Impact with Stones Embedded in Compacted Soil. Part II
title_fullStr Kinetics and Dynamics of the Stiff and Flexible Tines with the Duckfoot and the Coulter after Impact with Stones Embedded in Compacted Soil. Part II
title_full_unstemmed Kinetics and Dynamics of the Stiff and Flexible Tines with the Duckfoot and the Coulter after Impact with Stones Embedded in Compacted Soil. Part II
title_short Kinetics and Dynamics of the Stiff and Flexible Tines with the Duckfoot and the Coulter after Impact with Stones Embedded in Compacted Soil. Part II
title_sort kinetics and dynamics of the stiff and flexible tines with the duckfoot and the coulter after impact with stones embedded in compacted soil. part ii
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8875634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35207892
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15041351
work_keys_str_mv AT lisowskialeksander kineticsanddynamicsofthestiffandflexibletineswiththeduckfootandthecoulterafterimpactwithstonesembeddedincompactedsoilpartii
AT swietochowskiadam kineticsanddynamicsofthestiffandflexibletineswiththeduckfootandthecoulterafterimpactwithstonesembeddedincompactedsoilpartii
AT dabrowskamagdalena kineticsanddynamicsofthestiffandflexibletineswiththeduckfootandthecoulterafterimpactwithstonesembeddedincompactedsoilpartii
AT klonowskijacek kineticsanddynamicsofthestiffandflexibletineswiththeduckfootandthecoulterafterimpactwithstonesembeddedincompactedsoilpartii
AT nowakowskitomasz kineticsanddynamicsofthestiffandflexibletineswiththeduckfootandthecoulterafterimpactwithstonesembeddedincompactedsoilpartii
AT chlebowskijarosław kineticsanddynamicsofthestiffandflexibletineswiththeduckfootandthecoulterafterimpactwithstonesembeddedincompactedsoilpartii
AT ferresamuel kineticsanddynamicsofthestiffandflexibletineswiththeduckfootandthecoulterafterimpactwithstonesembeddedincompactedsoilpartii
AT robergemartin kineticsanddynamicsofthestiffandflexibletineswiththeduckfootandthecoulterafterimpactwithstonesembeddedincompactedsoilpartii